tags etc

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

tags etc

Peter Russell-2
Hi All

Is there any 
1/    number limitation on how many tags we can have .

2/   limitation on nesting depth of tags.

3/   number limitation of pics.

One minor point - The "date/time creation". This seems to refer to the date the last time the file was modified. Wouldn't it be far more useful if it was based on the "original image creation date" in the exif info instead, as this would be more relevant in digital imaging. (I thought so anyway)

Look forward to hearing your views / replies etc;.

Regards Pete


How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
Digikam-users@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: tags etc

Bugzilla from marcus.popp@paranoidbsd.org
Hi Peter,

On 2006-04-05T04:16, Peter Russell wrote:
...
>  One minor point - The "date/time creation".
> This seems to refer to the date the last time the file was modified.
> Wouldn't it be far more useful if it was based on the "original
> mage creation date" in the exif info instead, as this would be more
> relevant in digital imaging. (I thought so anyway)
>  
>  Look forward to hearing your views / replies etc;.

I filled a bug report about importing photos which also regards this point.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124939
Please vote for it if you found it usefull.

so long,

Marcus.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: tags etc

Luis Bernardo-3
Marcus Popp wrote:

>Hi Peter,
>
>On 2006-04-05T04:16, Peter Russell wrote:
>...
>  
>
>> One minor point - The "date/time creation".
>>This seems to refer to the date the last time the file was modified.
>>Wouldn't it be far more useful if it was based on the "original
>>mage creation date" in the exif info instead, as this would be more
>>relevant in digital imaging. (I thought so anyway)
>>
>> Look forward to hearing your views / replies etc;.
>>    
>>
I noticed that the way you move your photos from your camera to your
albums affects the date/time creation. I use command line and I noticed
that if I use cp then the date/time get changed but if I use mv they
retain the original values. If you are afraid that something may go
wrong during the move, copy first the photos to  a tmp folder, then move
the photos from your camera to your digikam album, and if everything is
ok you can delete the copies.

>I filled a bug report about importing photos which also regards this point.
>http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124939
>Please vote for it if you found it usefull.
>
>so long,
>
>Marcus.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Digikam-users mailing list
>[hidden email]
>https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users