-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Hi list, having some time to test the new release, I took a new inrun at the raw conversion capacities of the image editor, but was not too successfull in creating images that look similar to the in-camera jpegs - I use a Minolta 7D which can produce raw and jpeg files of the same shot. What I do at the moment is: * Correct white balance, especially colour temperature and gamma, * fix colours - brightness, color, contrast * apply refocus sharpening One special problem I can not overcome are coloured areas resulting from blown out highlights. I played with bibble for some time and was very impressed with the simplicity of the basic operations when converting a raw file. Only speed and stability under linux didn't impress me so much. So I would like to know what is a recommended or widely used workflow for raw conversion in digikam. Regards - Markus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFkaInxxUzQSse11ARAg+GAJ4rZWI6VLx9vIHNgzR5+A3Rg/Hf1QCaAhQa ITaDFLSXV9m67PuBodEc2OY= =jQO5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Am Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2006 23:28 schrieb Markus Spring:
> Hi list, > having some time to test the new release, I took a new inrun at the raw > conversion capacities of the image editor, but was not too successfull in > creating images that look similar to the in-camera jpegs - I use a Minolta > 7D which can produce raw and jpeg files of the same shot. > > What I do at the moment is: > * Correct white balance, especially colour temperature and gamma, > * fix colours - brightness, color, contrast > * apply refocus sharpening > > One special problem I can not overcome are coloured areas resulting from > blown out highlights. > > I played with bibble for some time and was very impressed with the > simplicity of the basic operations when converting a raw file. Only speed > and stability under linux didn't impress me so much. > > So I would like to know what is a recommended or widely used workflow for > raw conversion in digikam. > digiKam uses a linear RAW conversion, which produces systematically too dark pictures with the side effect of colored highlights. If you go to the last tab "Lightness" you can adjust the non-linear conversion curve to create an almost satisfactory correction. By the way, it is not the aim of RAW conversion to reproduce the JPEG with accuracy, it wouldn't make sense. RAW conversion is a development process that requires custom settings or human intervention. Gerhard -- http://www.gerhard.fr _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |