please if you are using "internal" mysql database in digikam reply to this message

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

please if you are using "internal" mysql database in digikam reply to this message

Francesco Riosa
Valid also if you know someone that do use the "internal" database feature.

Rationale is that I badly want to remove it, but hate to remove
functionality that is seen as useful by users.

best regards,
Francesco Riosa

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: please if you are using "internal" mysql database in digikam reply to this message

Veaceslav Munteanu
hello,
you mean SQLite? 
Yes, i use it.
I know that MySql is faster and better, but i didn't find time to configure it.


On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Francesco Riosa <[hidden email]> wrote:
Valid also if you know someone that do use the "internal" database feature.

Rationale is that I badly want to remove it, but hate to remove functionality that is seen as useful by users.

best regards,
Francesco Riosa

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel



--
Veaceslav

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: please if you are using "internal" mysql database in digikam reply to this message

Francesco Riosa
hi,
    I'm speaking of internal mysql database which was intended to make
digikam start it's own instance of a mysql server. The option is
highlighted in the screenshot attached.

Sqlite has to be considered the most tested and stable storage for
digikam, while I'm working on better support for mysql it's not yet to
be considered exactly on par with it, it will be for 2.2 or 2.3 tough.
That said I've no intention to ever remove sqlite, which would be vetoed
anyway from the real digikam developers (those that do the hard work ;)

- Francesco

On 09/06/11 07:58, Veaceslav Munteanu wrote:

> hello,
> you mean SQLite?
> Yes, i use it.
> I know that MySql is faster and better, but i didn't find time to
> configure it.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Francesco Riosa <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Valid also if you know someone that do use the "internal" database
>     feature.
>
>     Rationale is that I badly want to remove it, but hate to remove
>     functionality that is seen as useful by users.
>
>     best regards,
>     Francesco Riosa
>
>     _________________________________________________
>     Digikam-devel mailing list
>     [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>     https://mail.kde.org/mailman/__listinfo/digikam-devel
>     <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel>
>
>
> --
> Veaceslav
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

internal_mysql_db16.png (16K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: please if you are using "internal" mysql database in digikam reply to this message

Veaceslav Munteanu
No, i'm not using it.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Francesco Riosa <[hidden email]> wrote:
hi,
  I'm speaking of internal mysql database which was intended to make digikam start it's own instance of a mysql server. The option is highlighted in the screenshot attached.

Sqlite has to be considered the most tested and stable storage for digikam, while I'm working on better support for mysql it's not yet to be considered exactly on par with it, it will be for 2.2 or 2.3 tough. That said I've no intention to ever remove sqlite, which would be vetoed anyway from the real digikam developers (those that do the hard work ;)

- Francesco


On 09/06/11 07:58, Veaceslav Munteanu wrote:
hello,
you mean SQLite?
Yes, i use it.
I know that MySql is faster and better, but i didn't find time to
configure it.


On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Francesco Riosa <[hidden email]
<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

   Valid also if you know someone that do use the "internal" database
   feature.

   Rationale is that I badly want to remove it, but hate to remove
   functionality that is seen as useful by users.

   best regards,
   Francesco Riosa

   _________________________________________________
   Digikam-devel mailing list
   [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>



_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel




--
Veaceslav

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel