photomanagement software side by side : and digiKam ?

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Hi all,

Just to buzz your mind during this summer (:=))), look these pages :

==> http://photo-editing-software-review.toptenreviews.com

1 / where are opensource sofwares ?
2 / try to place digiKam and look like we are not too bad !

==> Second link :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_viewers

digiKam features summary is poor ! Why ?

==> And the last, always under wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digikam

Not really nice compared to Picasa : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picasa

If there are wikipedia contributors in this room, please fix digiKam page... Thanks in advance...

regards

Gilles Caulier

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

2007/7/26, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:

Hi all,

Just to buzz your mind during this summer (:=))), look these pages :

==> <a href="http://photo-editing-software-review.toptenreviews.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)"> http://photo-editing-software-review.toptenreviews.com

1 / where are opensource sofwares ?
2 / try to place digiKam and look like we are not too bad !

==> Second link :

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_viewers" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)"> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_viewers

digiKam features summary is poor ! Why ?

And look there are few error in array :

==> Supported Desktop env. : KDE only ==> KDE, Gnome, X11.
==> File Formats ! PSD : NO ==> YES (read only)
==> View fonctionality ==> we can found few opensource programs, but not digiKam. Why ?

Gilles Caulier


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gerhard Kulzer]

Am Thursday 26 July 2007 schrieb Gilles Caulier:

> Hi all,
>
> Just to buzz your mind during this summer (:=))), look these pages :
>
> ==> http://photo-editing-software-review.toptenreviews.com
>
> 1 / where are opensource sofwares ?
> 2 / try to place digiKam and look like we are not too bad !
>
> ==> Second link :
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_viewers
>
> digiKam features summary is poor ! Why ?

I updated this one

Gerhard

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

On Friday, 27. July 2007, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:

> Am Thursday 26 July 2007 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just to buzz your mind during this summer (:=))), look these pages :
> >
> > ==> http://photo-editing-software-review.toptenreviews.com
> >
> > 1 / where are opensource sofwares ?
> > 2 / try to place digiKam and look like we are not too bad !
> >
> > ==> Second link :
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_viewers
> >
> > digiKam features summary is poor ! Why ?
>
> I updated this one

Maybe replace the wikipedia Digikam 'See also' section with a
link to Comparison_of_image_viewers.  The list there is much more
complete.

Same for 'See also' of F-spot. Having a link to
Comparison_of_image_viewers in every image viewer
would be of course ideal ;)

Achim
>
> Gerhard
>



--
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- [hidden email]
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gerhard Kulzer]

Am Friday 27 July 2007 schrieb Achim Bohnet:

> On Friday, 27. July 2007, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
> > Am Thursday 26 July 2007 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Just to buzz your mind during this summer (:=))), look these pages :
> > >
> > > ==> http://photo-editing-software-review.toptenreviews.com
> > >
> > > 1 / where are opensource sofwares ?
> > > 2 / try to place digiKam and look like we are not too bad !
> > >
> > > ==> Second link :
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_viewers
> > >
> > > digiKam features summary is poor ! Why ?
> >
> > I updated this one
>
> Maybe replace the wikipedia Digikam 'See also' section with a
> link to Comparison_of_image_viewers.  The list there is much more
> complete.
>
> Same for 'See also' of F-spot. Having a link to
> Comparison_of_image_viewers in every image viewer
> would be of course ideal ;)
>
> Achim
>

I did so, thanks Achim

who improved our page so greatly on WP?

Gerhard

--
Hakuna matata
http://www.gerhard.fr

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Dnia piątek 27 lipiec 2007, Gerhard Kulzer napisał:
> I did so, thanks Achim
> who improved our page so greatly on WP?

Berhnard had busy day :)

I've corrected few issues but it requires some skilled Wikipedians to
organize it better and add few screenshots.

m.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Bernhard Rode-3]

Am 27.07.2007 um 18:31 schrieb Mikolaj Machowski:

> Dnia piątek 27 lipiec 2007, Gerhard Kulzer napisał:
>> I did so, thanks Achim
>> who improved our page so greatly on WP?
>
> Berhnard had busy day :)
>
> I've corrected few issues but it requires some skilled Wikipedians to
> organize it better and add few screenshots.
>
> m.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>

I just added some things of the Digikam homepage.

I wanted to reorganize/style them this weekend.
Let's see if I get the time...
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel