Hi All
when looking some collection, I see several thumbnails are missing. I have for example one which contains 10 pictures (as shown in the collection title and in the folder), but only see 3 thumbnails and I have no filter activated hopefully pictures are still present in the folder (in bold those I see in digikam): ~/Images/Public/2016/2016-01$ ls -alh
I have created a new configuration from scratch (after removing digikamrc) but same result
thanks for helping
regards frederic
|
Which digiKam version do you use ? There is no special settings in RC files for thumbnails. But the digikam thumbs database store all wavelets small images. Stop digiKam, rename this database file, and restart, it will be created from scratch. It's solve your problem ? Gilles Caulier 2017-01-08 13:27 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <[hidden email]>:
|
I'm using 5.4.01 Will make it and come back to you Le 8 janv. 2017 14:38, "Gilles Caulier" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Hi Gilles I'm using 5.4.0-01 proceeded as you suggested renamed the db and start it again -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 402M janv. 8 13:32
thumbnails-digikam.db.sav unfortunately the result is the same :-(, still missing the sames (I suppose the difference between size will be reduced as I will go trhough each folder, right ?)
when I look at the logs from the terminal I found the lines below
relatives to one of the picture not shown digikam.dimg:
"/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01xxxxxx/20160212_165709.jpg"
: JPEG file identified regards Le 08/01/2017 à 14:37, Gilles Caulier a
écrit :
|
no. there is no suitable debug trace here. When you is in suppected album press F5 to force to refresh thumbnails. What's the trace on the console in this case. thumb DB is small on start because it's empty and mus be populated step by step or with maintenance tool. Gilles Caulier 2017-01-08 17:21 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <[hidden email]>:
|
Hi Gilles
here are the trace after F5 digikam.general: One job is done Le 08/01/2017 à 17:50, Gilles Caulier a
écrit :
|
Nothing special here. No error reported. Just to test. Can you change a file name from : 2016-01 ballade à Plougrescant/20160212_165723. 2016-01_ballade_a_Plougrescant/20160212_165723. ==> remove space and replace 'à' by 'a'. Gilles Caulier 2017-01-08 20:15 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <[hidden email]>:
|
Also, where thumbs database file is store, what's the free space on disk (use df on command line). Gilles Caulier 2017-01-08 20:18 GMT+01:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Hi Gilles
Done (but ity was working like this since months) frederic@Fred-PC
~/Images/Public/2016/2016-01_ballade_plougrescant $ ls
and igikam.dimg:
"/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01_ballade_plougrescant/20160213_103343.jpg"
: JPEG file identified .....
but no change disk space is 88% full regards frederic
Le 08/01/2017 à 20:18, Gilles Caulier a
écrit :
|
Ok, next stage is simple. 1/ create fe fresh account on your system 2/ log to this account 3/ start digiKam and create a clean setup with an empty collection 4/ import suspect JPEG in your collection 5/ check if problem is reproducible. Gilles Caulier 2017-01-08 20:53 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <[hidden email]>:
|
There may be a problem with versioned images. Activate all options to display
versioned images. Maik On Sonntag, 8. Januar 2017 23:07:19 CET Gilles Caulier wrote: > Ok, next stage is simple. > > 1/ create fe fresh account on your system > 2/ log to this account > 3/ start digiKam and create a clean setup with an empty collection > 4/ import suspect JPEG in your collection > 5/ check if problem is reproducible. > > Gilles Caulier > > 2017-01-08 20:53 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <[hidden email]>: > > Hi Gilles > > > > > > Done > > > > (but ity was working like this since months) > > > > frederic@Fred-PC ~/Images/Public/2016/2016-01_ballade_plougrescant $ ls > > 20160212_164025.jpg 20160212_165705.jpg 20160212_165732.jpg > > 20160213_103343.jpg > > 20160212_164033.jpg 20160212_165709.jpg 20160212_165736.jpg > > 20160212_164235.jpg 20160212_165723.jpg 20160212_165739.jpg > > > > > > and > > > > igikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01_ballade_ > > plougrescant/20160213_103343.jpg" : JPEG file identified > > digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > > digikam.general: One job is done > > > > ..... > > > > > > but no change > > > > disk space is 88% full > > > > regards > > > > frederic > > > > > > > > > > Le 08/01/2017 à 20:18, Gilles Caulier a écrit : > > > > Nothing special here. No error reported. > > > > Just to test. Can you change a file name from : > > > > 2016-01 ballade à Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg > > > > 2016-01_ballade_a_Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg > > > > ==> remove space and replace 'à' by 'a'. > > > > Gilles Caulier > > > > 2017-01-08 20:15 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <[hidden email]>: > >> Hi Gilles > >> > >> > >> here are the trace after F5 > >> > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > >> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à > >> Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg" : JPEG file identified > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à > >> Plougrescant/20160212_165739.jpg" : JPEG file identified > >> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à > >> Plougrescant/20160212_165705.jpg" : JPEG file identified > >> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à > >> Plougrescant/20160212_165736.jpg" : JPEG file identified > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à > >> Plougrescant/20160212_164235.jpg" : JPEG file identified > >> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > >> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à > >> Plougrescant/20160212_165732.jpg" : JPEG file identified > >> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à > >> Plougrescant/20160212_164025.jpg" : JPEG file identified > >> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à > >> Plougrescant/20160212_164033.jpg" : JPEG file identified > >> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à > >> Plougrescant/20160212_164033.jpg" : JPEG file identified > >> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > >> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > >> digikam.general: One job is done > >> digikam.general: List of Pending Jobs is empty > >> digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through DBUS > >> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread > >> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread > >> digikam.geoiface: ---- > >> > >> > >> Le 08/01/2017 à 17:50, Gilles Caulier a écrit : > >> > >> no. there is no suitable debug trace here. When you is in suppected album > >> press F5 to force to refresh thumbnails. > >> > >> What's the trace on the console in this case. > >> > >> thumb DB is small on start because it's empty and mus be populated step > >> by step or with maintenance tool. > >> > >> Gilles Caulier > >> > >> 2017-01-08 17:21 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume < <[hidden email]> > >> > >> [hidden email]>: > >>> Hi Gilles > >>> > >>> I'm using 5.4.0-01 > >>> > >>> proceeded as you suggested > >>> > >>> renamed the db and start it again > >>> > >>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 402M janv. 8 13:32 > >>> thumbnails-digikam.db.sav > >>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,1M janv. 8 17:08 recognition.db > >>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 21M janv. 8 17:08 digikam4.db > >>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 7,5M janv. 8 17:11 thumbnails-digikam.db > >>> > >>> unfortunately the result is the same :-(, still missing the sames > >>> > >>> (I suppose the difference between size will be reduced as I will go > >>> trhough each folder, right ?) > >>> > >>> > >>> when I look at the logs from the terminal I found the lines below > >>> relatives to one of the picture not shown > >>> > >>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/ > >>> 2016/2016-01xxxxxx/20160212_165709.jpg" : JPEG file identified > >>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1 > >>> digikam.geoiface: ---- > >>> Recreating ksycoca file ("/home/frederic/.cache/ksycoc > >>> a5_fr_ao0C4YqXkXGF5j1o5s7kezL5ncg=", version 303) > >>> > >>> can it help ? > >>> > >>> regards > >>> > >>> Le 08/01/2017 à 14:37, Gilles Caulier a écrit : > >>> > >>> Which digiKam version do you use ? > >>> > >>> There is no special settings in RC files for thumbnails. But the digikam > >>> thumbs database store all wavelets small images. Stop digiKam, rename > >>> this > >>> database file, and restart, it will be created from scratch. It's solve > >>> your problem ? > >>> > >>> Gilles Caulier > >>> > >>> 2017-01-08 13:27 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume < <[hidden email]> > >>> > >>> [hidden email]>: > >>>> Hi All > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> when looking some collection, I see several thumbnails are missing. > >>>> > >>>> I have for example one which contains 10 pictures (as shown in the > >>>> collection title and in the folder), but only see 3 thumbnails and I > >>>> have > >>>> no filter activated > >>>> > >>>> hopefully pictures are still present in the folder (in bold those I see > >>>> in digikam): > >>>> > >>>> ~/Images/Public/2016/2016-01$ ls -alh > >>>> total 26492drwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,0K nov. 26 11:18 . > >>>> drwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 12K déc. 25 12:00 .. > >>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 1,7M nov. 26 11:18 20160212_164025.jpg* > >>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,1M nov. 26 11:17 20160212_164033.jpg > >>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,4M nov. 26 11:18 20160212_164235.jpg > >>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,7M nov. 26 11:17 20160212_165705.jpg* > >>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,1M nov. 26 11:17 20160212_165709.jpg > >>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,0M nov. 26 11:18 20160212_165723.jpg > >>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,5M nov. 26 11:17 20160212_165732.jpg > >>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,8M nov. 26 11:18 20160212_165736.jpg > >>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,4M nov. 26 11:18 20160212_165739.jpg > >>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 631K nov. 26 11:17 20160213_103343.jpg* > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I have created a new configuration from scratch (after removing > >>>> digikamrc) but same result > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> thanks for helping > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> regards > >>>> > >>>> frederic -- Gruß Maik |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Thanks Gilles
will try it somewhere this week. just notice that in the table view I see all the pictures with thier thumbnails, problem is only in the thumbnails view to Maik what are the options to set ?
regards frederic
Le 08/01/2017 à 23:07, Gilles Caulier a
écrit :
|
Do you see empty squares instead of the thumbnails or all you can see is just the three files with thumbnails and nothing else? Best regards, Andrey Goreev On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Frédéric Chaume <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by fch22
2017-01-09 18:24 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <[hidden email]>:
In Settings/Configure/Image Editor/Versioning panel. Gilles Caulier |
In reply to this post by AndriusWild
Hi Andrey In table view I see all 10 correct thumbnails as before. In the thumbnail view, I only see 3 correct ones (don't have any empty thumbnails ) Regards Le 9 janv. 2017 18:29, "Andrey Goreev" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
I bet they will show up after you check the box "show all versions" I have had this issue beforeBest regards, Andrey Goreev On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Frederic Chaume <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Ok will test it when back home Le 9 janv. 2017 18:48, "Andrey Goreev" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Hi good news, when setting the option "always display original
pictures" the missing ones are back :-) nothing else to do ?
(by the way I downloaded the last version published this morning,
the name was the same, just the date changed, so I'm sure I have
the latest one :-) ) thanks for Your help
regards frederic
Le 09/01/2017 à 18:36, Gilles Caulier a
écrit :
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |