libkexiv2 0.1.2 available for testing

Hi please test the new tarball you can find here:
http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/

I haven't test it against exiv2 0.14 yet, so any
feedbacks here are welcome.

Gilles, hope we'll see on digikam# tomorrow for
the release details.

Happy testing,
        Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Alle 13:13, domenica 8 aprile 2007, Angelo Naselli ha scritto:

> Alle 08:48, domenica 8 aprile 2007, Gilles Caulier ha scritto:
> > Angelo,
> >
> > Why there is an empty folder "doc" in your tarball ?
> hmm should study the release script for that.
>
> Tonight I'll fix the readme as well.
>
> Angelo
>

It should be ok now, can you test it?

http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/

Tomorrow, or the day after I'd like to release it officially.

Let me know,
        Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Compile fine here

Gilles

2007/4/8, Angelo Naselli <[hidden email]>:

Alle 13:13, domenica 8 aprile 2007, Angelo Naselli ha scritto:

> Alle 08:48, domenica 8 aprile 2007, Gilles Caulier ha scritto:
> > Angelo,
> >
> > Why there is an empty folder "doc" in your tarball ?
> hmm should study the release script for that.
>
> Tonight I'll fix the readme as well.
>
> Angelo
>

It should be ok now, can you test it?
http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/

Tomorrow, or the day after I'd like to release it officially.

Let me know,
        Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Rex Dieter]

Angelo Naselli wrote:

> Hi please test the new tarball you can find here:
> http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/
>
> I haven't test it against exiv2 0.14 yet, so any
> feedbacks here are welcome.

Good news:  builds, good work.

Bad news: Now all we need are new/compatible releases of kipi-plugins and
digikam (latest releases both fail to build against exiv2-0.14). :(

-- Rex

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Alle 15:30, lunedì 9 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
> Angelo Naselli wrote:
>
> > Hi please test the new tarball you can find here:
> > http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/
> >
> > I haven't test it against exiv2 0.14 yet, so any
> > feedbacks here are welcome.
>
> Good news:  builds, good work.
Thanks for your report, I'll upload them tomorrow i believe.
 
> Bad news: Now all we need are new/compatible releases of kipi-plugins and
> digikam (latest releases both fail to build against exiv2-0.14). :(
As far as i know they should need libkexiv2 not exiv2, so you should need to
rebuild them after libkexiv2.
Gilles?

Angelo

P.S. if needed i could postpone the release.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Rex Dieter]

Angelo Naselli wrote:

> Alle 15:30, lunedì 9 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:

>> Bad news: Now all we need are new/compatible releases of kipi-plugins and
>> digikam (latest releases both fail to build against exiv2-0.14). :(

> As far as i know they should need libkexiv2 not exiv2, so you should need
> to rebuild them after libkexiv2.

That's incorrect.  I tried against exiv2-0.14 and libkexiv2-1.1.2, otherwise
I wouldn't have mentioned it otherwise.

-- Rex

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Alle 20:41, lunedì 9 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:

> Angelo Naselli wrote:
>
> > Alle 15:30, lunedì 9 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
>
> >> Bad news: Now all we need are new/compatible releases of kipi-plugins and
> >> digikam (latest releases both fail to build against exiv2-0.14). :(
>
> > As far as i know they should need libkexiv2 not exiv2, so you should need
> > to rebuild them after libkexiv2.
>
> That's incorrect.  I tried against exiv2-0.14 and libkexiv2-1.1.2, otherwise
> I wouldn't have mentioned it otherwise.

Can you post the errors? Since Gilles seems not to be present.

I'll install it tomorrow anyway and looking at it though.

Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Rex Dieter]

Angelo Naselli wrote:

> Alle 20:41, lunedì 9 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:

>> That's incorrect.  I tried against exiv2-0.14 and libkexiv2-1.1.2,
>> otherwise I wouldn't have mentioned it otherwise.

> Can you post the errors? Since Gilles seems not to be present.

fyi, build.log references:
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/digikam/
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/kipi-plugins/

I'd welcome the better news that I did something wrong to induce the
failure.

-- Rex




_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Alle 18:55, martedì 10 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:

> Gilles Caulier wrote:
>
> > 2007/4/9, Rex Dieter <[hidden email]>:
>
> >> Bad news: Now all we need are new/compatible releases of kipi-plugins and
> >> digikam (latest releases both fail to build against exiv2-0.14). :(
>
> > digiKam 0.9.2 implementation from svn compile fine against Exiv2 0.14.
> > kipi-plugins do not depand directly from Exiv2 and use only libkexiv2.
>
> fyi, neither digikam-0.9.1 nor kipi-plugins-0.1.3 build against exiv2-0.14 +
> libkexiv2-0.1.2, build log references:
> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/digikam/
> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/kipi-plugins/

I'll give it a look asap.
>
> Unless you can gleen from those failed build.log's that I did something
> wrong.
>
> > digiKam 0.9.2 is planed during June.
>
> Bad news indeed.  So distributions (that provide digikam) can't upgrade
> exiv2-0.14 until June?

distributions have packagers, packagers can add patches for that anyway ;)


Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Alle 18:56, martedì 10 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:

> Angelo Naselli wrote:
>
> > Alle 20:41, lunedì 9 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
>
> >> That's incorrect.  I tried against exiv2-0.14 and libkexiv2-1.1.2,
> >> otherwise I wouldn't have mentioned it otherwise.
>
> > Can you post the errors? Since Gilles seems not to be present.
>
> fyi, build.log references:
> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/digikam/
> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/kipi-plugins/

GIlles can you provide a patch to manage new libkexiv api, if i'm not wrong

it's related to the new printExiv2ExceptionError and Exiv2::Error management.

        Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Alle 18:55, martedì 10 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:

> Gilles Caulier wrote:
>
> > 2007/4/9, Rex Dieter <[hidden email]>:
>
> >> Bad news: Now all we need are new/compatible releases of kipi-plugins and
> >> digikam (latest releases both fail to build against exiv2-0.14). :(
>
> > digiKam 0.9.2 implementation from svn compile fine against Exiv2 0.14.
> > kipi-plugins do not depand directly from Exiv2 and use only libkexiv2.
>
> fyi, neither digikam-0.9.1 nor kipi-plugins-0.1.3 build against exiv2-0.14 +
> libkexiv2-0.1.2, build log references:
> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/digikam/
> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/kipi-plugins/

Ok i see, at least for kipi-plugins I'm trying to make a patch. The problem is

on old kexivInterface and the missed libkexiv2/libkexiv2.h.
The first one should be fixed using a patch I've already did, but for
the second one i need more time and tonight i'm tired.

Gilles don't tell me api didn't change, this mess is worst :p

Anyway, you can get the first patch by using from svn under libs
svn diff --old kipi-plugins/@627500 --new kipi-plugins/@627501 > kexiv2.patch

Now we should decide (at least for kipi) if release a patched version or
a new release.

Cheers,
   Angelo (who doesn't release new libkexiv2 yet)

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Alle 08:10, mercoledì 11 aprile 2007, Gilles Caulier ha scritto:

> 2007/4/10, Angelo Naselli <[hidden email]>:
> >
> > Alle 18:55, martedì 10 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
> > > Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2007/4/9, Rex Dieter <[hidden email]>:
> > >
> > > >> Bad news: Now all we need are new/compatible releases of kipi-plugins
> > and
> > > >> digikam (latest releases both fail to build against exiv2-0.14). :(
> > >
> > > > digiKam 0.9.2 implementation from svn compile fine against Exiv2 0.14.
> > > > kipi-plugins do not depand directly from Exiv2 and use only libkexiv2.
> > >
> > > fyi, neither digikam-0.9.1 nor kipi-plugins-0.1.3 build against
> > exiv2-0.14 +
> > > libkexiv2-0.1.2, build log references:
> > >
> > http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/digikam/
> > >
> > http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/kipi-plugins/
> > Ok i see, at least for kipi-plugins I'm trying to make a patch. The
> > problem is
> > on old kexivInterface and the missed libkexiv2/libkexiv2.h.
> > The first one should be fixed using a patch I've already did, but for
> > the second one i need more time and tonight i'm tired.
>
>
> The patch against digiKAm is into svn trunk. Look this commit :
>
> http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=642723

Thanks, that's what i needed the revisione tag ;)

As far as i can say (as soon mandriva fix svn server) I'll patch our kipi-plugins and digikam
releases to make it available with new exiv2/libkexiv2.

Do you think we should make the patches available on our sites?

Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

2007/4/11, Angelo Naselli <[hidden email]>:

Alle 08:10, mercoledì 11 aprile 2007, Gilles Caulier ha scritto:

> 2007/4/10, Angelo Naselli <[hidden email]>:
> >
> > Alle 18:55, martedì 10 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
> > > Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2007/4/9, Rex Dieter <[hidden email]>:
> > >
> > > >> Bad news: Now all we need are new/compatible releases of kipi-plugins
> > and
> > > >> digikam (latest releases both fail to build against exiv2-0.14). :(
> > >
> > > > digiKam 0.9.2 implementation from svn compile fine against Exiv2 0.14 .
> > > > kipi-plugins do not depand directly from Exiv2 and use only libkexiv2.
> > >
> > > fyi, neither digikam-0.9.1 nor kipi-plugins-0.1.3 build against
> > exiv2-0.14 +
> > > libkexiv2-0.1.2, build log references:
> > >
> > http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/digikam/
> > >
> > http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/kipi-plugins/
> > Ok i see, at least for kipi-plugins I'm trying to make a patch. The
> > problem is
> > on old kexivInterface and the missed libkexiv2/libkexiv2.h.
> > The first one should be fixed using a patch I've already did, but for
> > the second one i need more time and tonight i'm tired.
>
>
> The patch against digiKAm is into svn trunk. Look this commit :
>
> http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=642723

Thanks, that's what i needed the revisione tag ;)
As far as i can say (as soon mandriva fix svn server) I'll patch our kipi-plugins and digikam
releases to make it available with new exiv2/libkexiv2.

Do you think we should make the patches available on our sites?

Yes, you can  until we release next version of kipi-plugins and digiKam

Gilles

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Rex Dieter]

Angelo Naselli wrote:

> Do you think we should make the patches available on our sites?

Yes, please.  Pretty please with sugar on top.  In fact, if/when we are ever
in the same city at the same time (akademy perhaps?), I'll commit to
providing the provider of said patches with several adult beverages of
their choice. :)

-- Rex


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Alle 16:11, venerdì 13 aprile 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
> Angelo Naselli wrote:
>
> > Well i had to do that for mandriva package so you can get
> > the kipi-plugins's one here:
> > http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/patches/kipi-plugins/
> >
> > Please test it and let me know...
>
> Thanks, I can confirm kipi-plugins builds (at least) with those.
And the digikam one is:
http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/patches/digikam/

Since it builds ok and i didn't receive any bad feed back I'll release
new libkexiv2 today.

Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel