Hi,
in SVN, branches were at time copied or merged to trunk, and then deleted.
With git, it's different: git branch will always show all branches that
existed in history. That is somewhat natural, because a good part of our
development history happened in those branches. But I would suggest to give
the branches a unified naming: A name of the branch is the release that
resulted from the branch.
So this would map "SVN branch name" -> "git branch name":
gsoc-2010 -> 2.0
1.0-databaseext -> 1.3
modelviewport -> 1.2
db-consolidation -> 0.10
0.8-experimental -> 0.8
stable-0.8 -> 0.8.x
For kipi-plugins and libkdcraw we can have a "2.0" branch, for libkexiv2
"1.2".
Any viewpoints?
Marcel
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Locked
