explicit constructors

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

explicit constructors

Johannes Wienke-3
Hi,

is there any reason that the krazy warning about missing explicit
keywords for constructors with possibly one argument is not fixed?
Otherwise I could fix a lot of these issues.

Johannes


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

signature.asc (268 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: explicit constructors

Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
Krazy is just a "stupid" script, not all it complains about is bad.
I don't think anyone will use widgets like this:

SomeWidget* a = parent;

or so. It is just a warning... it is not really an issue. There are more
serious issues to fix than such ones :-)

Andi

On Tuesday 10 November 2009 15:02:52 Johannes Wienke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any reason that the krazy warning about missing explicit
> keywords for constructors with possibly one argument is not fixed?
> Otherwise I could fix a lot of these issues.
>
> Johannes
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: explicit constructors

Johannes Wienke-3
Am 10.11.2009 15:26 schrieb Andi Clemens:
> Krazy is just a "stupid" script, not all it complains about is bad.
> I don't think anyone will use widgets like this:
>
> SomeWidget* a = parent;
>
> or so. It is just a warning... it is not really an issue. There are more
> serious issues to fix than such ones :-)

Nevertheless, would it hurt if I commit those changes I made while being
seriously bored by a biology course? ;)

Johannes


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

signature.asc (268 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: explicit constructors

Marcel Wiesweg

> >
> > or so. It is just a warning... it is not really an issue. There are more
> > serious issues to fix than such ones :-)
>
> Nevertheless, would it hurt if I commit those changes I made while being
> seriously bored by a biology course? ;)

Oh dont see any problems with that.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: explicit constructors

Johannes Wienke-3
Am 13.11.2009 12:39 schrieb Marcel Wiesweg:
>>> or so. It is just a warning... it is not really an issue. There are more
>>> serious issues to fix than such ones :-)
>> Nevertheless, would it hurt if I commit those changes I made while being
>> seriously bored by a biology course? ;)
>
> Oh dont see any problems with that.

But now I can wait until we meet this evening ;)

btw: I will arrive at Werden S at 17:57.

See you soon,
Johannes


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

signature.asc (268 bytes) Download Attachment