Hi,
I have a question concerning the rotation of pictures according to their exif information (I am using svn trunk). The rotation of the thumbs works fine and also when entering the image editor, the rotation is respected. However, when moving to the next picture in the image editor, one gets the message "The image 'IMG_5347.JPG' has been modified. Do you want to save it." This is very annoying if one just wants to look at a sequence of images (eg. for rating and tagging). Is there a way to avoid this warning? (I would prefer if this automatic rotation would be done in the image editor, but ignored as a change of the picture). Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Le Vendredi 07 Avril 2006 05:26 PM, Arnd Baecker a écrit :
> Hi, > > I have a question concerning the rotation of pictures according > to their exif information (I am using svn trunk). > The rotation of the thumbs works fine and also > when entering the image editor, the rotation is respected. > > However, when moving to the next picture in the image editor, > one gets the message > "The image 'IMG_5347.JPG' has been modified. > Do you want to save it." > > This is very annoying if one just wants to look at a sequence > of images (eg. for rating and tagging). > Is there a way to avoid this warning? > (I would prefer if this automatic rotation would be done in the image > editor, but ignored as a change of the picture). Yes, this problem exist since we have done a common image editor/showfoto implementation. This is not a bug, but a missing feature... What do you think to add a simple checked box option in image editor/showfoto setup to lets unchanged the image after auto-rotating ? Marcel, Paco, your viewpoint ? Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Caulier Gilles wrote:
> Le Vendredi 07 Avril 2006 05:26 PM, Arnd Baecker a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I have a question concerning the rotation of pictures according > > to their exif information (I am using svn trunk). > > The rotation of the thumbs works fine and also > > when entering the image editor, the rotation is respected. > > > > However, when moving to the next picture in the image editor, > > one gets the message > > "The image 'IMG_5347.JPG' has been modified. > > Do you want to save it." > > > > This is very annoying if one just wants to look at a sequence > > of images (eg. for rating and tagging). > > Is there a way to avoid this warning? > > (I would prefer if this automatic rotation would be done in the image > > editor, but ignored as a change of the picture). > > Yes, this problem exist since we have done a common image editor/showfoto > implementation. This is not a bug, but a missing feature... > > What do you think to add a simple checked box option in image editor/showfoto > setup to lets unchanged the image after auto-rotating ? Sounds perfect to me! > Marcel, Paco, your viewpoint ? Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-2
> > However, when moving to the next picture in the image editor,
> > one gets the message > > "The image 'IMG_5347.JPG' has been modified. > > Do you want to save it." > > > > This is very annoying if one just wants to look at a sequence > > of images (eg. for rating and tagging). > > Is there a way to avoid this warning? > > (I would prefer if this automatic rotation would be done in the image > > editor, but ignored as a change of the picture). > > Yes, this problem exist since we have done a common image editor/showfoto > implementation. This is not a bug, but a missing feature... > > What do you think to add a simple checked box option in image > editor/showfoto setup to lets unchanged the image after auto-rotating ? > > Marcel, Paco, your viewpoint ? Yes, that needs to be done. I wasn't aware of this, but that is very annoying if one has exif-rotated images. The user might be unaware that the image has been rotated at all. I would even change this without a setup option, but if there is need for an option, that's fine with me as long as the default is not to count it as a change. Marcel > > Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Marcel Wiesweg schrieb: > I would even change this without a setup option, but if there is need for an > option, that's fine with me as long as the default is not to count it as a > change. I second this - there is no reason even to inform the user as long as the image is not changed. Could I get some explanation: If I have images that get rotated automatically, then there should be no necessity to save the image anew, isn't it? All manipulations go to the image in it's default physical orientation - landscape - and only the display is rotated according to the exif flag. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Regards - Markus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEN7ttxxUzQSse11ARAq7TAKCLI6/BSQzCVooABSZ9ImCfXZAWEwCfUP0x z5he5zLDBS+0NQfQwpzX8gE= =25Nx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Le Samedi 08 Avril 2006 03:32 PM, Markus Spring a écrit :
> Marcel Wiesweg schrieb: > > I would even change this without a setup option, but if there is need for > > an option, that's fine with me as long as the default is not to count it > > as a change. > > I second this - there is no reason even to inform the user as long as the > image is not changed. > > Could I get some explanation: If I have images that get rotated > automatically, then there should be no necessity to save the image anew, > isn't it? All manipulations go to the image in it's default physical > orientation - landscape - and only the display is rotated according to the > exif flag. > > Please correct me if I'm wrong. yes. but the a flag is toogle in internal because exif-autorotate use a rotate standard method that tooglr this flag. It's simple. We can just please image editor to ignore to toogle this flag only if exifautorate is operated. Marcel, i'm agree. No need to add another option for that. We will explain better how to work exif-autorotate feature in the handbook and in dialog setup tooltips. If you want to fix exif-autorotate, you can do it. It very easy to do. Just unforget showfoto that i have add recently exif-autorotate capability in svn (showfoto form digikam 0.8.x do not have this feature) Gilles > > Regards - Markus > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |