digikamdatabase so versioning

[Johannes Wienke-2]

Hi,

I just found this line in the digikam/CMakeLists.txt:
SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES(digikamdatabase PROPERTIES VERSION 1.0.0 SOVERSION 1 )

Is it wanted that the so version is not incremented with the general
digikam version?

Regards,
Johannes


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

It's usually a good idea. Look how i manage soname it in libkdcraw for ex.

Gilles

2010/4/2 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>:

> Hi,
>
> I just found this line in the digikam/CMakeLists.txt:
> SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES(digikamdatabase PROPERTIES VERSION 1.0.0 SOVERSION 1 )
>
> Is it wanted that the so version is not incremented with the general
> digikam version?
>
> Regards,
> Johannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Johannes Wienke-3]

Am 02.04.2010 12:33 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> It's usually a good idea. Look how i manage soname it in libkdcraw for ex.

So you mean we need to change this in digikam to let the so version
follow the digikam version?

Johannes

> 2010/4/2 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just found this line in the digikam/CMakeLists.txt:
>> SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES(digikamdatabase PROPERTIES VERSION 1.0.0 SOVERSION 1 )
>>
>> Is it wanted that the so version is not incremented with the general
>> digikam version?


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

2010/4/2 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>:
> Am 02.04.2010 12:33 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
>> It's usually a good idea. Look how i manage soname it in libkdcraw for ex.
>
> So you mean we need to change this in digikam to let the so version
> follow the digikam version?

In theory, no, because digiKam is alone to use internal shared
library. This include kioslave which are recompiled/installed at the
same time. But, i'm agree with you, that something must be wrong here
with kioslave. We have a lots of report about broken digiKam
kioslaves. This can be relevant with libdigikam soname... perhaps.

Marcel, what do you think about ?

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel