https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379918
Bug ID: 379918 Summary: Digikam writing tags in wrong order Product: digikam Version: 5.5.0 Platform: MS Windows OS: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: Tags Assignee: [hidden email] Reporter: [hidden email] Target Milestone: --- 1. Digikam is not writing tags in A-Z order. 2. Also it is not writing tags in the order as selected by user. So what order does it use and why? Won't option 1 or 2 not be a better idea? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379918
Simon <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #1 from Simon <[hidden email]> --- I assume there is no specific order enforced by digiKam or exiv2 (library used to write metadata). I don't directly see a reason why these should be ordered in the first place, I think that should be up to the software displaying the tags. And as far as I know no specification (exiv, iptc or xmp) says anything about ordering keywords. What is your use case for having them ordered? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379918
Simon <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO --- Comment #2 from Simon <[hidden email]> --- see above -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379918
Sebas <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Sebas <[hidden email]> --- In version 5.6.0 I can not reproduce this problem. This is what I believe after a little digging: The software displaying the tags (Windows Explorer) reports IPTC Keywords first, then EXIF XPKeyworks. What I see in 5.6.0 is that existing EXIF XPKeywords are written to IPTC Keywords when modifying tags. For example when the EXIF XPKeyworks field contains 'A,' and the tag 'Z' is added, then 'A; Z' is written to IPTC Keywords. Then the software displaying the tags reads 'A; Z' from IPTC Keywords and then 'A' from EXIF XPKeyworks. Obviously the latter is being displayed already, thus ignored. Status changed to resolved + invalid for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379918
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] Version Fixed In| |5.6.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379918
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS|unspecified |MS Windows -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |