https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351625
Bug ID: 351625 Summary: Support xmpMM history Product: digikam Version: 4.12.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: Metadata Assignee: [hidden email] Reporter: [hidden email] The XMP specification and Adobe products appear to use the XMP Media Management Schema to manage the history of a given file, including versioning. Digikam should implement the same history system to ensure compatibility. Some related documentation can be found here: http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/xmp/pdfs/XMPAssetRelationships.pdf http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/552-Deep-Dive.html http://www.exiv2.org/tags-xmp-xmpMM.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351625
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #1 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- This specification is available in Exiv2 since which version exactly ? Registered versionning info into this spec will work only with digiKam. There is not advantage to use this Adobe namespace, as tools settings to use between version are completely different and not compatible. digiKam use already Xmp to store versionning info : Xmp.digiKam.ImageHistory http://dev.exiv2.org/projects/exiv2/repository/entry/tags/0.25/src/properties.cpp#L197 The only think that we can do is to get/put information linking image files to make a sets of images. Gilles -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Alan Pater
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351625
--- Comment #2 from Alan Pater <[hidden email]> --- (In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #1) > This specification is available in Exiv2 since which version exactly ? I'm not sure how long xmpMM been there, it predates my involvement with exiv2. The web page listing those properties is dated May 2013. > > Registered versionning info into this spec will work only with digiKam. > There is not advantage to use this Adobe namespace, as tools settings to use > between version are completely different and not compatible. You mean it is impossible to decode the field values written by Adobe products and that other applications would be unable to decode the values written by digikam? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Alan Pater
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351625
--- Comment #3 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- I fear yes. Example : I patch and image to fix WB. The settings is specific to digiKam tool. Abode will be completely different. How to join both ? Gilles -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |