https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
--- Comment #19 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- I used media-gfx/exiv2-0.23 since "23. Feb 2013" together with - media-gfx/digikam-2.9.0 - media-gfx/digikam-3.1.0 - media-gfx/digikam-3.5.0 In all this time, I can't remember to have encountered this bug. So did digiKam 4.x break compatibility with media-gfx/exiv2-0.23? ==> digiKam no, because it don't use Exiv2 API directly. All is done through libkexiv2 interface. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Peter Albrecht-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
--- Comment #20 from Peter Albrecht <[hidden email]> --- (In reply to Peter Albrecht from comment #18) > (In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #11) > > LibExiv2: 0.23 ==> this is not the last one, and it's very old now. Bug come > > from this lib. Me i use 0.24 (the last one) > > LibKExiv2: 2.3.1 : sound like the last implementation. > > Same old lib seems to apply to me: > My digiKam says: > ------------------ 8< ------------------ > [...] > LibExiv2: 0.23 > [...] > LibKDE: 4.12.5 > LibKExiv2: 2.3.1 > [...] > ------------------ >8 ------------------ > > There is a media-gfx/exiv2-0.24 in gentoo's portage tree. So I started > compiling... ;) > I am not shure, if I can finish it this evening, but I hope I find time this > weekend. > I will report... Done compiling. But bad news: Bug is still there. :( Details: I installed "media-gfx/exiv2-0.24", which replaced "media-gfx/exiv2-0.23". Gentoo automatically compiled "kde-base/libkexiv2-4.12.5" again, to use exiv2-0.24. After this, I started digiKam, which lists at "Components Information": ------------------ 8< ------------------ [...] LibExiv2 0.24 [...] LibKExiv2 2.3.1 [...] ------------------ >8 ------------------ But there are still no EXIF informations shown in the "Metadata" tab of the right side view. :( Then I even recompiled digiKam, but this did not change anything. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Peter Albrecht-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
--- Comment #21 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Peter, Ok, so i suspect a garbage in your digiKam configuration file. Rename your ~/.kde4/share/config/digikamrc file as *.old. Restart digiKam, and try again Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Peter Albrecht-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
--- Comment #22 from Peter Albrecht <[hidden email]> --- (In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #21) > Ok, so i suspect a garbage in your digiKam configuration file. > Rename your ~/.kde4/share/config/digikamrc file as *.old. Restart digiKam, > and try again I moved my "digikamrc" file away, started digiKam and click through the configuration wizard, without changing one single option. Then I pasted one image in the new album, but the EXIF tab of the "Metadata" side view keeps empty. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Peter Albrecht-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
--- Comment #23 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Well, i don't know why this problem happen, and why i cannot reproduce it here... Somebody use git/master code (next 4.3.0 release) to check if this problem disappear ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Peter Albrecht-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #24 from [hidden email] --- Hi, after reading about this bug report I think its something openSuSE 13.1 specific. I also run digikam 4.3 (package built by openSuSE) on a openSuSE 13.1 system and have the very same problem. To make sure that its not a specific setting I created a new user account on my system and started digikam for the new user and saw the same problem. From digikams component information I get this info: LibExiv2: 0.23 LibKExiv2: 2.3.1 However when I try to find the version of libkexiv2 I get different versions. Which version does digikam dynamically link in: [krienke@bliss:~/tmp] 1017 > ldd /usr/bin/digikam|grep exiv libkexiv2.so.11 => /usr/lib64/libkexiv2.so.11 (0x00002b3323dab000) libexiv2.so.12 => /usr/lib64/libexiv2.so.12 (0x00002b332c4e7000) Which rpm package does this so lib file belong to: [krienke@bliss:~/tmp] 1018 > rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libkexiv2.so.11 libkexiv2-11-4.11.5-298.1.x86_64 Print Information about the package: [krienke@bliss:~/tmp] 1019 > rpm -qi libkexiv2-11 Name : libkexiv2-11 Version : 4.11.5 Release : 298.1 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Fr 07 Feb 2014 10:42:08 CET Group : Development/Libraries/KDE .... So digikam reports version 2.3.1 for libkexiv2, the rpm package management reports Version 4.11.5. Actually I am confused now. Rainer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Peter Albrecht-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
--- Comment #25 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- The right Exiv2 or libkexiv2 libraries version used by digiKam are listed in Help/Components Info dialog. All other information taken from package manager cannot indicate which libraries are used by digiKam, but only installed one. The digiKam dialog show components used to compile and link digiKam. There is no doubt using this dialog. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Peter Albrecht-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
--- Comment #26 from [hidden email] --- Le 29/09/2014 16:25, Gilles Caulier a écrit : > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783 > > --- Comment #25 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- > The right Exiv2 or libkexiv2 libraries version used by digiKam are listed in > Help/Components Info dialog. > > All other information taken from package manager cannot indicate which > libraries are used by digiKam, but only installed one. > > The digiKam dialog show components used to compile and link digiKam. There is > no doubt using this dialog. > > Gilles Caulier > Hi, The solution proposed Sept. 27 by Gian Paolo Sanino Vattier in"SOLVED: updated to DK4.3.0 purpose it crashes and can not go back to 4.2.0 ..." topic, solvemissing EXIFbug. On opensuse 13.1, simply install both packages offered by Gian Paolo (or only libkexiv2-11-4.14.1-1.1, if DK 4.3.0-24.1 packageis already installed, which was my case). #338783 The bug is solved for me.:-) JP -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Peter Albrecht-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
--- Comment #27 from [hidden email] --- Hello Jean Pierre, thanks for the hint. Using libkexiv2 http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/KDE:/Current/openSUSE_13.1/x86_64/libkexiv2-11-4.14.1-1.1.x86_64.rpm found by Gian Paolo Sanino Vattier it works fine now. However the versioning of libkexiv2 seems to be mixed up else I cannot understand that digikam tells me that this new Version is V2.3.1 and the package itself says it contains V4.14.1. Anyway it works... Thanks Rainer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Peter Albrecht-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
--- Comment #28 from Peter Albrecht <[hidden email]> --- Thanks for the hint on using "libkexiv2 4.14.1". Unfortunatly on gentoo linux this package depends on KDE 4.14.1, which is still marked as unstable in gentoo portage. Using this would mean a lot of "accept_keywords"-configuration with great potential of other failure. ;) So I'm waiting for KDE 4.14.1 becoming stable in "gentoo world". I will report again then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Peter Albrecht-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338783
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Version Fixed In| |4.4.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #29 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Following response from Jean Pierre and Krienke, this file sound solved to update libkexiv2. I close this file now. Don't hesitate to re-open if necessary. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |