https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337921
--- Comment #18 from Cor <[hidden email]> --- (In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #17) > yes probably. But this is a weird work around with possible side effect. > > Gilles Caulier okay.. the guys at the IRC ask me if I've got the sources, but there is no /src folder in digikam-4.11.0.tar.bz2, so aparently that is not the file they expect me to download. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Cor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337921
--- Comment #19 from Cor <[hidden email]> --- (In reply to Cor from comment #18) > (In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #17) > > yes probably. But this is a weird work around with possible side effect. > > > > Gilles Caulier > > okay.. the guys at the IRC ask me if I've got the sources, but there is no > /src folder in digikam-4.11.0.tar.bz2, so aparently that is not the file > they expect me to download. By the way: modifying the script takes me until the part where it says that it can't find exiv2 at least in version 0.24 (my slackware has 0.23) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Cor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337921
--- Comment #20 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Why do you compile digiKam with extra lib embeded. it's for libkexiv2. Install this lib from your system as well. option for cmake are described here : https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README#L129 Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Cor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337921
--- Comment #21 from Cor <[hidden email]> --- (In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #20) > Why do you compile digiKam with extra lib embeded. it's for libkexiv2. > Install this lib from your system as well. option for cmake are described > here : > > https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam- > software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README#L129 > > Gilles Caulier Well... it is sort of sbopkg which does determine that for me... and here is the funny bit: if I'm using the sbopkg build-command, it doesn't complain about exiv2... so apparently they've found a way around this.... I'll try and tweak the CMakfiles.txt in /conf and let sbopkg use that, I'm quite curious as to where that will take me. Mind you: I think the root-cause is the version reported back, not so much digikam... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Cor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337921
--- Comment #22 from Cor <[hidden email]> --- (In reply to Cor from comment #21) > (In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #20) > > Why do you compile digiKam with extra lib embeded. it's for libkexiv2. > > Install this lib from your system as well. option for cmake are described > > here : > > > > https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam- > > software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README#L129 > > > > Gilles Caulier > > Well... it is sort of sbopkg which does determine that for me... and here is > the funny bit: if I'm using the sbopkg build-command, it doesn't complain > about exiv2... so apparently they've found a way around this.... > I'll try and tweak the CMakfiles.txt in /conf and let sbopkg use that, I'm > quite curious as to where that will take me. > > Mind you: I think the root-cause is the version reported back, not so much > digikam... Alas, again no joy: [ 45%] Generating index.cache.bz2 cd /tmp/SBo/digikam-4.11.0/doc-translated/nl && /usr/bin/meinproc4 --check --cache /tmp/SBo/digikam-4.11.0/build/doc-translated/nl/index.cache.bz2 /tmp/SBo/digikam-4.11.0/doc-translated/nl/index.docbook index.docbook:120: parser error : Entity 'Ivo.de.Klerk' not defined &Freek.de.Kruijf;&Ivo.de.Klerk; ^ make[2]: *** [doc-translated/nl/index.cache.bz2] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/SBo/digikam-4.11.0/build' make[1]: *** [doc-translated/nl/CMakeFiles/nl-handbook.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/SBo/digikam-4.11.0/build' make: *** [all] Error 2 strange that this happens, don't you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Cor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337921
--- Comment #23 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- yes problem is know. Some translators of documentation use recent docbook syntax published with last KDE4x. It do not compile with older one. It's hanbook, not digiKam source code. Just disable doc compilation with cmake Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Cor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337921
--- Comment #24 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Did you turn around the handbook compilation problem ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Cor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337921
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Version Fixed In| |4.12.0 Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED --- Comment #25 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Even if doc do not compile, the original report about broken compilation with libgphoto2 is fixed now. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Cor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337921
--- Comment #26 from Cor <[hidden email]> --- (In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #24) > Did you turn around the handbook compilation problem ? > > Gilles Caulier Nope, not yet. I'll try again later on this week (weather permitting). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Cor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337921
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Portability |Bundle-Tarball -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |