https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
Bug ID: 331261 Summary: Import not using Date/Time Original or Create Date EXIF data Classification: Unclassified Product: digikam Version: 3.5.0 Platform: Archlinux Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: NOR Component: Import Assignee: [hidden email] Reporter: [hidden email] When importing images using the 'Import->Add Images' function, the EXIF data for date isn't coming from the "Date/Time" or "Original Create Date" EXIF data fields but rather appears to be originating from either the "File Modification Date/Time", "File Access Date/Time", and/or "File Inode Change Date/Time" EXIF fields. This is a problem especially when using the "Date-based sub-albums" import setting, since the actual photo creation date and time is wrongly represented. I also noticed that the thumbnails "Created:" field is also displaying the same wrong EXIF data. Again, it's displaying modified date/time instead of original date/time. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Import images with modified date/time differing from Original date/time using "Date-based sub-albums" import setting. 2. 3. Actual Results: Newly imported images in sub-folder in "My Albums" shows modified instead of created date as folder name. Expected Results: Folder should be using original image dates (instead of modified dates) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
--- Comment #1 from [hidden email] --- FYI, the correct creation date is shown once the image is imported. The folder that it's imported into is of course still not correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by jay
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #2 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Jay, This problem still here using last digiKam 4.2.0 ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by jay
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Import not using Date/Time |Import not using Date/Time |Original or Create Date |Original or create date |EXIF data |EXIF data -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by jay
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
Teemu Rytilahti <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #3 from Teemu Rytilahti <[hidden email]> --- IIRC this is at the moment hard-coded to be the mtime of the file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by jay
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #4 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- *** Bug 343053 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by jay
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
--- Comment #5 from Nicofo <[hidden email]> --- @[hidden email] To solve your problem, it is required that exif is read during import. I don't think it is possible: see bug #285683 comment 3 : "Reading the Exif date is not an option because retrieving the metadata of all pictures on the memory card would be very slow." @Gilles Caulier you put Bug #343053 as a duplicate of this one. It is more of less related but is something different: - Here: the date taken at import (that will be used in Date-based sub-albums functionality) is the one of the file instead of the one of EXIF. - Bug #343053 : the date at import (that will be used to set the file's date) is dependent of the setting 'Update file timestamp when files are modified' while it should not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by jay
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
--- Comment #6 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- digiKam 4.12.0 is out. https://www.digikam.org/node/741 Problem still reproducible ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by jay
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
kai.blauberg <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #7 from kai.blauberg <[hidden email]> --- The bug prevails still in digikam 4.13.0. Kai -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by jay
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|3.5.0 |4.13.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by jay
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #8 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> --- If the option "Use file metadata (makes connection slower)" in the camera setup is enabled, then the EXIF date / time is used from the image. I think, we can close this bug. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by jay
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331261
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Version Fixed In| |5.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |