https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137320Gilles Caulier <
[hidden email]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Version Fixed In| |4.4.0
--- Comment #23 from Gilles Caulier <
[hidden email]> ---
Since digiKam use a database to store thumbnail, showing icon view items is
very fast and faster than storing thumbnail using .thumbnails cache directory.
I think this feature don't need to be implemented.
I compared digiKam with Gwenview on my i7-3Ghz-16Gb-SSD using a large album
including more than 150 24Mpx JPEG.
digiKam is very fast. It take 2 seconds to regenerate all thumbnails and cache
items in database. Navigate to this album with cache show items immediately :
delay is very short.
Gwenview take around 5s to generate thumbnails. Cache is done in .thumbnails,
not in database. Navigate to this album with cache show items immediately :
delay is very short as digiKam.
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel