[digiKam-users] selective batch queue execution

[fch22]

Hi all

I'm using DK7.1 and I have a problem with the batch queue manager (problem was the same with previous releases)

let take an example: I have created 2 queues: #1 and #2  with different workflows. now I would like to run only one

• so I select #1 and click on run  => OK, the workflow is correctly executed on picture from #1
  
• now I select the #2 and click on run => NOK , #2 is not executed, but #1 is executed instead.

and if I "run all" , then #1 and #2 are correctly executed

did I miss something ?

thanks for your help

frederic

[Maik Qualmann]

The problem has been fixed in digiKam-7.2.0-RC.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430818

Maik

Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2021, 09:11:20 CET schrieb frederic chaume:

> Hi all
>
> I'm using DK7.1 and I have a problem with the batch queue manager
> (problem was the same with previous releases)
>
> let take an example: I have created 2 queues: #1 and #2  with different
> workflows. now I would like to run only one
>
>   * so I select #1 and click on run  => OK, the workflow is correctly
>     executed on picture from #1
>   * now I select the #2 and click on run => NOK , #2 is not executed,
>     but #1 is executed instead.
>
> and if I "run all" , then #1 and #2 are correctly executed
>
> did I miss something ?
>
> thanks for your help
>
> frederic

[fch22]

Thanks Maik

another reason to move to 7.2

Regards

frederic

Le 30/01/2021 à 13:17, Maik Qualmann a écrit :

> The problem has been fixed in digiKam-7.2.0-RC.
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430818
>
> Maik
>
> Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2021, 09:11:20 CET schrieb frederic chaume:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm using DK7.1 and I have a problem with the batch queue manager
>> (problem was the same with previous releases)
>>
>> let take an example: I have created 2 queues: #1 and #2  with different
>> workflows. now I would like to run only one
>>
>>    * so I select #1 and click on run  => OK, the workflow is correctly
>>      executed on picture from #1
>>    * now I select the #2 and click on run => NOK , #2 is not executed,
>>      but #1 is executed instead.
>>
>> and if I "run all" , then #1 and #2 are correctly executed
>>
>> did I miss something ?
>>
>> thanks for your help
>>
>> frederic
>
>
>

[Gilles Caulier-4]

One other reason ??? Heu, no, many, many, many reason_s_ in fact. See
the release note with the release candidate :

https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/blob/master/NEWS

This list is the difference with the last stable release 7.1.0... Convinced ?

Best regards

Gilles Caulier

Le sam. 30 janv. 2021 à 13:19, frederic chaume
<[hidden email]> a écrit :

>
> Thanks Maik
>
> another reason to move to 7.2
>
> Regards
>
> frederic
>
> Le 30/01/2021 à 13:17, Maik Qualmann a écrit :
> > The problem has been fixed in digiKam-7.2.0-RC.
> >
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430818
> >
> > Maik
> >
> > Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2021, 09:11:20 CET schrieb frederic chaume:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> I'm using DK7.1 and I have a problem with the batch queue manager
> >> (problem was the same with previous releases)
> >>
> >> let take an example: I have created 2 queues: #1 and #2  with different
> >> workflows. now I would like to run only one
> >>
> >>    * so I select #1 and click on run  => OK, the workflow is correctly
> >>      executed on picture from #1
> >>    * now I select the #2 and click on run => NOK , #2 is not executed,
> >>      but #1 is executed instead.
> >>
> >> and if I "run all" , then #1 and #2 are correctly executed
> >>
> >> did I miss something ?
> >>
> >> thanks for your help
> >>
> >> frederic
> >
> >
> >

[Ronald Orenstein]

When will the MacOS version of 7.2 be available?

Ronald Orenstein 1825 Shady Creek Court Mississauga, ON L5L 3W2 Canada ronorenstein.blogspot.com

On Jan 30, 2021, 8:33 AM -0500, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>, wrote:

One other reason ??? Heu, no, many, many, many reason_s_ in fact. See
the release note with the release candidate :

https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/blob/master/NEWS

This list is the difference with the last stable release 7.1.0... Convinced ?

Best regards

Gilles Caulier

Le sam. 30 janv. 2021 à 13:19, frederic chaume
<[hidden email]> a écrit :

Thanks Maik

another reason to move to 7.2

Regards

frederic

Le 30/01/2021 à 13:17, Maik Qualmann a écrit :

The problem has been fixed in digiKam-7.2.0-RC.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430818

Maik

Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2021, 09:11:20 CET schrieb frederic chaume:

Hi all

I'm using DK7.1 and I have a problem with the batch queue manager
(problem was the same with previous releases)

let take an example: I have created 2 queues: #1 and #2 with different
workflows. now I would like to run only one

* so I select #1 and click on run => OK, the workflow is correctly
executed on picture from #1
* now I select the #2 and click on run => NOK , #2 is not executed,
but #1 is executed instead.

and if I "run all" , then #1 and #2 are correctly executed

did I miss something ?

thanks for your help

frederic

[Gilles Caulier-4]

macOS, Windows, and Linux bundles are released at the same time.

But you can try the pre-release here. It's near the final version (aka
release candidate).

https://files.kde.org/digikam/

Gilles Caulier

Le sam. 30 janv. 2021 à 15:29, <[hidden email]> a écrit :

>
> When will the MacOS version of 7.2 be available?
>
> Ronald Orenstein 1825 Shady Creek Court Mississauga, ON L5L 3W2 Canada ronorenstein.blogspot.com
> On Jan 30, 2021, 8:33 AM -0500, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>, wrote:
>
> One other reason ??? Heu, no, many, many, many reason_s_ in fact. See
> the release note with the release candidate :
>
> https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/blob/master/NEWS
>
> This list is the difference with the last stable release 7.1.0... Convinced ?
>
> Best regards
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> Le sam. 30 janv. 2021 à 13:19, frederic chaume
> <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
>
> Thanks Maik
>
> another reason to move to 7.2
>
> Regards
>
> frederic
>
> Le 30/01/2021 à 13:17, Maik Qualmann a écrit :
>
> The problem has been fixed in digiKam-7.2.0-RC.
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430818
>
> Maik
>
> Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2021, 09:11:20 CET schrieb frederic chaume:
>
> Hi all
>
> I'm using DK7.1 and I have a problem with the batch queue manager
> (problem was the same with previous releases)
>
> let take an example: I have created 2 queues: #1 and #2 with different
> workflows. now I would like to run only one
>
> * so I select #1 and click on run => OK, the workflow is correctly
> executed on picture from #1
> * now I select the #2 and click on run => NOK , #2 is not executed,
> but #1 is executed instead.
>
> and if I "run all" , then #1 and #2 are correctly executed
>
> did I miss something ?
>
> thanks for your help
>
> frederic
>
>
>
>

[fch22]

Hi Gilles

just installed the 7.2rc, all but my previous workflows have
disappeared, is there a way to recover ?

regards

frederic


Le 30/01/2021 à 14:32, Gilles Caulier a écrit :

> One other reason ??? Heu, no, many, many, many reason_s_ in fact. See
> the release note with the release candidate :
>
> https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/blob/master/NEWS
>
> This list is the difference with the last stable release 7.1.0... Convinced ?
>
> Best regards
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> Le sam. 30 janv. 2021 à 13:19, frederic chaume
> <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>> Thanks Maik
>>
>> another reason to move to 7.2
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> frederic
>>
>> Le 30/01/2021 à 13:17, Maik Qualmann a écrit :
>>> The problem has been fixed in digiKam-7.2.0-RC.
>>>
>>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430818
>>>
>>> Maik
>>>
>>> Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2021, 09:11:20 CET schrieb frederic chaume:
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> I'm using DK7.1 and I have a problem with the batch queue manager
>>>> (problem was the same with previous releases)
>>>>
>>>> let take an example: I have created 2 queues: #1 and #2  with different
>>>> workflows. now I would like to run only one
>>>>
>>>>     * so I select #1 and click on run  => OK, the workflow is correctly
>>>>       executed on picture from #1
>>>>     * now I select the #2 and click on run => NOK , #2 is not executed,
>>>>       but #1 is executed instead.
>>>>
>>>> and if I "run all" , then #1 and #2 are correctly executed
>>>>
>>>> did I miss something ?
>>>>
>>>> thanks for your help
>>>>
>>>> frederic
>>>
>>>

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Hi,

Under Linux, Workflow settings from BQM are stored in a common xml
file located in your home directory :

~/.local/share/digikam/queue.xml

I don't remember a place change to store this file between 6 and 7 releases.

Giles Caulier

Le dim. 31 janv. 2021 à 09:01, frederic chaume
<[hidden email]> a écrit :

>
> Hi Gilles
>
> just installed the 7.2rc, all but my previous workflows have
> disappeared, is there a way to recover ?
>
> regards
>
> frederic
>
>
> Le 30/01/2021 à 14:32, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
> > One other reason ??? Heu, no, many, many, many reason_s_ in fact. See
> > the release note with the release candidate :
> >
> > https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/blob/master/NEWS
> >
> > This list is the difference with the last stable release 7.1.0... Convinced ?
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Gilles Caulier
> >
> > Le sam. 30 janv. 2021 à 13:19, frederic chaume
> > <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> >> Thanks Maik
> >>
> >> another reason to move to 7.2
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> frederic
> >>
> >> Le 30/01/2021 à 13:17, Maik Qualmann a écrit :
> >>> The problem has been fixed in digiKam-7.2.0-RC.
> >>>
> >>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430818
> >>>
> >>> Maik
> >>>
> >>> Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2021, 09:11:20 CET schrieb frederic chaume:
> >>>> Hi all
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm using DK7.1 and I have a problem with the batch queue manager
> >>>> (problem was the same with previous releases)
> >>>>
> >>>> let take an example: I have created 2 queues: #1 and #2  with different
> >>>> workflows. now I would like to run only one
> >>>>
> >>>>     * so I select #1 and click on run  => OK, the workflow is correctly
> >>>>       executed on picture from #1
> >>>>     * now I select the #2 and click on run => NOK , #2 is not executed,
> >>>>       but #1 is executed instead.
> >>>>
> >>>> and if I "run all" , then #1 and #2 are correctly executed
> >>>>
> >>>> did I miss something ?
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks for your help
> >>>>
> >>>> frederic
> >>>
> >>>