Hello,
I still have in 6.3 a very old bug with rotation. I have the setup of "do not show the image accounting with the rotation flag", else I couldn't know what image to rotate (not every program knows of this flag). On the digikam thumbnail view (the most usual), if I see an vertical image and I clic once on the rotate left icon, the iage is rotated left by 180° when it should be 90°. rotating it right restore the right position. happen before any other edit jdd -- http://dodin.org |
The rotation is executed correctly. If you rotate in preview mode, the
thumbnail from the thumbnail bar may come out of the sync. The thumbnail in the icon view is correct. It's just a cache issue in the thumbnail bar. I have a look at it. Maik Am Freitag, 4. Oktober 2019, 21:15:39 CEST schrieb [hidden email]: > Hello, > > I still have in 6.3 a very old bug with rotation. > > I have the setup of "do not show the image accounting with the rotation > flag", else I couldn't know what image to rotate (not every program > knows of this flag). > > On the digikam thumbnail view (the most usual), if I see an vertical > image and I clic once on the rotate left icon, the iage is rotated left > by 180° when it should be 90°. > > rotating it right restore the right position. > > happen before any other edit > > jdd |
Le 05/10/2019 à 19:21, Maik Qualmann a écrit :
> The rotation is executed correctly. >> I still have in 6.3 a very old bug with rotation. >> >> I have the setup of "do not show the image accounting with the rotation >> flag", else I couldn't know what image to rotate (not every program >> knows of this flag). >> >> On the digikam thumbnail view (the most usual), if I see an vertical >> image and I clic once on the rotate left icon, the iage is rotated left >> by 180° when it should be 90°. >> I'm sorry to insist on this problem, but it hits me badly. May be I found the problem? * the "show image thumbnail according to the rotation tag" seems to be wrong and do exactly the opposite. If clicked, the image *is not* rotated. Vertical image (tagged left, bottom) is seen with top to the left. * the same image, rotated in the editor or in digikam *is* seen vertical and quoted top, left thanks jdd -- http://dodin.org |
Q : it's RAW images ? If no, well camera store probably a wrong orientation in Exif metadata. It's a know problem with some camera or phone. If yes, well, welcome in mess RAW world, where preview JPEG embedded in RAW do not use the same orientation than RAW image data. Of course JPEG embedded do not always have Exif info... Gilles Caulier Le 05/10/2019 à 19:21, Maik Qualmann a écrit : |
Le 08/10/2019 à 10:41, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
> Q : it's RAW images ? no. Panasonic GX80 jpg > > If no, well camera store probably a wrong orientation in Exif metadata. I don't think so, specially because as soon as I changed this setup, all worked fine, no more 180° rotation when -90° is required... it's a very old problem I solved by using gwenview to make the rotation, so I guess it's something pretty naked is some part of the code, may be in exiv2? look at this image: https://ncloud.zaclys.com/index.php/s/DM58MDDB88tjFgK seems perfectly normal may be also it's a problem with my openSUSE Leap distribution? thanks jdd -- http://dodin.org |
Hello list,
On 08.10.19 11:20, [hidden email] wrote: > I don't think so, specially because as soon as I changed this setup, all worked > fine, no more 180° rotation when -90° is required... > > it's a very old problem I solved by using gwenview to make the rotation, so I > guess it's something pretty naked is some part of the code, may be in exiv2? I am still using digiKam version 5.9.0 (Debian Stretch). With this version, I am hit by this problem, too: When I click "Item" > "Rotate" > "Right", the picture is not rotated -90° but 180°. Interestingly, using "Item" > "Auto Rotate/Flip Using Exif Information", the pictures are rotated correctly. ;) So having imported all images from camera, the first thing I do is: "select all" + "Auto Rotate..." Maybe this helps in your case, too. Regards, Peter |
Le 08/10/2019 à 18:07, Peter Albrecht a écrit :
> Maybe this helps in your case, too. > > at least not to be alone, yes, thanks :-)) jdd -- http://dodin.org |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |