DK6beta3 appimage.
I have some "big searches' that take a long time (mostly due to the thumbnails as far as I can see). When I click on the search tab, dk automatically execute the last search. Is there some way of not doing that? Either as a setting or a button to execute the search or... Thanks -- sknahT vyS |
Hi, Gilles Caulier Le mar. 6 nov. 2018 à 18:11, <[hidden email]> a écrit : DK6beta3 appimage. |
I missed that, where can I download dk6b3?
TIA Iñigo. |
At usual place : Note : this url is given in digiKam.org web site... Le mar. 6 nov. 2018 à 20:08, Iñigo <[hidden email]> a écrit : I missed that, where can I download dk6b3? |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
On 11/6/18 8:01 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Hi, > > If i remember the Maik changes for this feature, the last selected > search is only started if the search view from left sidebar is selected > at startup. Did you confirm ? Hi This feature is not changed in digikam git r41039. I never select search view at startup but last search is automatically executed when i click on "search" |
In reply to this post by Iñigo
https://files.kde.org/digikam/
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:08:07 +0100 Iñigo <[hidden email]> wrote: > I missed that, where can I download dk6b3? > > TIA > > > Iñigo. > -- sknahT vyS |
In reply to this post by leoutation
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:21:46 +0100
[hidden email] wrote: > On 11/6/18 8:01 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If i remember the Maik changes for this feature, the last > > selected > search is only started if the search view from left > > sidebar is selected > at startup. Did you confirm ? > Hi > This feature is not changed in digikam git r41039. > I never select search view at startup but last search is > automatically executed when i click on "search" The automatic search happens: 1. At startup, if I exited DK while in the search tab. 2. During DK, if I click on the search tab. Often I don't want the previous search, I want to do a new search. -- sknahT vyS |
Yes, that's right, the search will run at startup if the tab was active or the
tab will be selected. The auto search can be deactivated in the search input (right mouse button menu). The search is a virtual album and displays the last search. As an alternative, create a simple quick search and select it before leaving. At the speed we work constantly. Another problem is sorting by file name by natural sorting. Are the thumbnails displayed faster when you sort by date? Maik Am Dienstag, 6. November 2018, 20:41:34 CET schrieb [hidden email]: > The automatic search happens: > > 1. At startup, if I exited DK while in the search tab. > 2. During DK, if I click on the search tab. > > Often I don't want the previous search, I want to do a new search |
I don't know if searching by date would be faster, I never
use the sort by date because of my naming conventions: text-yyyymmdd-counter_from_camera.ext, so it's already sorted by name & date. To me, it looks like the slowdown/speed is due to the thumbnail previews. The files are there but then DK takes a while to display them. I have 50000 images (no video), is it worthwhile to convert to mysql/mariadb? How much faster would it be? Thanks Syv On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 21:14:04 +0100 Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> wrote: > Yes, that's right, the search will run at startup if the tab was > active or the tab will be selected. The auto search can be > deactivated in the search input (right mouse button menu). The > search is a virtual album and displays the last search. As an > alternative, create a simple quick search and select it before > leaving. At the speed we work constantly. Another problem is > sorting by file name by natural sorting. Are the thumbnails > displayed faster when you sort by date? > > Maik > > Am Dienstag, 6. November 2018, 20:41:34 CET schrieb > [hidden email]: > > The automatic search happens: > > > > 1. At startup, if I exited DK while in the search tab. > > 2. During DK, if I click on the search tab. > > > > Often I don't want the previous search, I want to do a new > > search > > > > -- sknahT vyS |
On 11/6/18 9:33 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
> I don't know if searching by date would be faster, I never > use the sort by date because of my naming conventions: > text-yyyymmdd-counter_from_camera.ext, so it's already sorted by name & > date. > > To me, it looks like the slowdown/speed is due to the thumbnail > previews. The files are there but then DK takes a while to display them. > > I have 50000 images (no video), is it worthwhile to convert to > mysql/mariadb? How much faster would it be? Thumbnails creation speed depends on hardisk performances. I use Mariadb external server (on localhost) because it's faster than sqlite. You have to know that migrating from sqlite to mariadb will take a long time, many, many hours. It depends on your hardware. |
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 23:19:10 +0100
[hidden email] wrote: > On 11/6/18 9:33 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > > I don't know if searching by date would be faster, I never > > use the sort by date because of my naming conventions: > > text-yyyymmdd-counter_from_camera.ext, so it's already sorted by > > name & date. > > > > To me, it looks like the slowdown/speed is due to the thumbnail > > previews. The files are there but then DK takes a while to > > display them. > > > > I have 50000 images (no video), is it worthwhile to convert to > > mysql/mariadb? How much faster would it be? > > Thumbnails creation speed depends on hardisk performances. I use > Mariadb external server (on localhost) because it's faster than > sqlite. You have to know that migrating from sqlite to mariadb will > take a long time, many, many hours. It depends on your hardware. I don't mind the time for the creation the thumbnails, it's one time only per ingestion. What I was asking (not very clearly: English is not my first, nor second language), is if when I have 50000 images and no video, will mysql/mariadb be the same speed (as sqlite) or faster or much faster during the regular browsing, searching... Thanks Syv -- sknahT vyS |
On 11/6/18 11:49 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 23:19:10 +0100 > [hidden email] wrote: > >> On 11/6/18 9:33 PM, [hidden email] wrote: >>> I don't know if searching by date would be faster, I never >>> use the sort by date because of my naming conventions: >>> text-yyyymmdd-counter_from_camera.ext, so it's already sorted by >>> name & date. >>> >>> To me, it looks like the slowdown/speed is due to the thumbnail >>> previews. The files are there but then DK takes a while to >>> display them. >>> >>> I have 50000 images (no video), is it worthwhile to convert to >>> mysql/mariadb? How much faster would it be? >> >> Thumbnails creation speed depends on hardisk performances. I use >> Mariadb external server (on localhost) because it's faster than >> sqlite. You have to know that migrating from sqlite to mariadb will >> take a long time, many, many hours. It depends on your hardware. > > I don't mind the time for the creation the thumbnails, it's one time > only per ingestion. > > What I was asking (not very clearly: English is not my first, nor > second language), is if when I have 50000 images and no video, will > mysql/mariadb be the same speed (as sqlite) or faster or much faster > during the regular browsing, searching... > >> Mariadb external server (on localhost) because it's faster than >> sqlite. You have to test yourself :) |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |