Hi, If I remember well, previously, BQM created new versions for new files resulting of a bqm processing, but recently, I notice no more versions seems linked to the original file. Did I miss something or it's actually due to the new plugin system or BQM never created new version (and I don't know how some version was created on some of my photos) ? Could this due to the fact I use "user script shell" ? Nicolas Boulesteix - Chasseur de Lueurs - https://www.photolib.fr |
With the "user script shell" you have to provide for a new output file, if
your operation creates none. Here: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393382 Maik Am Montag, 22. Juli 2019, 12:33:02 CEST schrieb Nicolas Boulesteix: > Hi, > > If I remember well, previously, BQM created new versions for new files > resulting of a bqm processing, but recently, I notice no more versions > seems linked to the original file. > > Did I miss something or it's actually due to the new plugin system or BQM > never created new version (and I don't know how some version was created on > some of my photos) ? > > Could this due to the fact I use "user script shell" ? |
Indeed, Gilles (Caulier), already help me here to make my user script shell when I need it. here is the script cp $INPUT $OUTPUT exiv2 -m'/media/nicolas/DataShareSSD/exiv2-cleanup.cmd' $OUTPUT exiv2 -Y'-26' -O'+2' -D'-12' ad $OUTPUT But still no version are created after running the batch (and I think previously it did). Additionally, running this batch ending without keeping the "processed" statut of the batch queue (I don't know why), at the end, all pictures which was "checked" as done, suddenly are unchecked at the end. Here one of the batch process I use: <queue> Le lun. 22 juil. 2019 à 20:23, Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> a écrit : With the "user script shell" you have to provide for a new output file, if Nicolas Boulesteix - Chasseur de Lueurs - http://www.photonoxx.fr
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |