My understanding is that digikam started life as Linux software, but I know it is now available on Windows as well. I have the flexibility to install digikam in Windows (10) or Linux (debian). My assumption was that digikam would be more reliable and the user interface would work better on on Linux, since that's what is was design for, but I realize that might not be true.
Which platform (Windows or Linux) will give digikam work better on? |
Hi,
The native development platform is Linux, of course. This one is so far better to code and hack, and it's free, not limited, and finally very powerful. The Windows port is a natural one, as we use Qt framework in the background which is designed to be portable everywhere (aka MacOS). The Windows as some limitations that Linux do not have, but step by step, version by version, Windows version becomes more stable and suitable as the Linux one. In all cases, depending of your choice, I highly recommend using the latest 7.0.0 which will be available officially this weekend on digiKam.org web site. You can use the weekly build here which are mostly the same as the future official bundle. https://files.kde.org/digikam/ To be a little bit more precise, 7.0.0 comes with more than 750 bugs closed since the last 6.4.0 stable release, with more than one year of development. https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/blob/master/project/NEWS.7.0.0 Voilà. I'm preparing the 7.0.0 release announcement, which takes a lot of time to write. So be patient... Best Gilles Caulier Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 10:31, <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > My understanding is that digikam started life as Linux software, but I know it is now available on Windows as well. I have the flexibility to install digikam in Windows (10) or Linux (debian). My assumption was that digikam would be more reliable and the user interface would work better on on Linux, since that's what is was design for, but I realize that might not be true. > > Which platform (Windows or Linux) will give digikam work better on? > |
Hi!
> The Windows as some limitations that Linux do not have, but step by > step, version by version, Windows version becomes more stable and > suitable as the Linux one. Where can i read more about this limitations? (I use as photo collector, metatag editor, tagging, etc, "just" meta editing, and not for editing the photo) Thanx Csaba On 2020-07-17 11:13, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Hi, > > The native development platform is Linux, of course. This one is so > far better to code and hack, and it's free, not limited, and finally > very powerful. > > The Windows port is a natural one, as we use Qt framework in the > background which is designed to be portable everywhere (aka MacOS). > > The Windows as some limitations that Linux do not have, but step by > step, version by version, Windows version becomes more stable and > suitable as the Linux one. > > In all cases, depending of your choice, I highly recommend using the > latest 7.0.0 which will be available officially this weekend on > digiKam.org web site. You can use the weekly build here which are > mostly the same as the future official bundle. > > https://files.kde.org/digikam/ > > To be a little bit more precise, 7.0.0 comes with more than 750 bugs > closed since the last 6.4.0 stable release, with more than one year of > development. > > https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/blob/master/project/NEWS.7.0.0 > > Voilà. I'm preparing the 7.0.0 release announcement, which takes a lot > of time to write. So be patient... > > Best > > Gilles Caulier > > Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 10:31, <[hidden email]> a écrit : >> My understanding is that digikam started life as Linux software, but I know it is now available on Windows as well. I have the flexibility to install digikam in Windows (10) or Linux (debian). My assumption was that digikam would be more reliable and the user interface would work better on on Linux, since that's what is was design for, but I realize that might not be true. >> >> Which platform (Windows or Linux) will give digikam work better on? >> |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |