[digiKam-users] LinkedIn user group...
Locked
12
12
[digiKam-users] LinkedIn user group...
 
|
Hi all users, So, i created a new digiKam users group to LinkedIn : https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12186015/ If you have an account to this social network, you can join the game. Best Gilles Caulier |
|
|
What is the difference between the mailing list and Google+, now LinkedIn? Sent from a fair mobile On Tue, 22 Jan 2019, 11:47 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email] wrote:
|
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Le 22/01/2019 à 11:47, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
> > So, i created a new digiKam users group to LinkedIn : I have an account because it's necessary to have one to read profile, but do not use it I'm active on facebook, tried Mastodon, but it's a tweeter clone and I'm not a tweeter man may be diaspora? https://mondiaspora.net/people/7e91ebc0006c013727ce431255dfe020 (just created today) jdd -- http://dodin.org |
|
|
In reply to this post by PackElend
Hi, The ML is only a place for this topic. that all. To share data it's limited, to found previous post it's complicated. ML is good but not perfect... With the SN, users group do not have these limitations. Everybody use a SN, more and less and are popular. If a project want to be popular (from user viewpoint), it must be registered in SN. G+ will disapear in a near future. Even if this SN was really comfortable to use (better than FB for ex), with plenty of geek users inside, it has never switch the proof of concept for me. It work there are users inside but how many people use it really ? I'm sure that it's less than FB. I dislike FB, for many reasons. The GUI is become weird in time. The privacy is the hell. This SN is not serious. At least, Linkedin is a SN dedicated to work, to find a job, to share experiences. I know that M$ acquire the platform few years ago... and then ? Gilles Caulier Le mar. 22 janv. 2019 à 13:03, Stefan Mueller <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
|
|
what about https://www.discourse.org/, is feels like that any moder project is using it now but I've learned is quite a challenge to get in running Le mar. 22 janv. 2019 à 13:17, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
|
|
Or, <cough>, https://discuss.pixls.us/c/software/digikam unless the intention is more public outreach to non-FOSS users? On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:14 AM Stefan Mueller <[hidden email]> wrote:
https://patdavid.net GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D 18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC |
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
I asked the German Wikipedia for LinkedIn, especially the criticism. LinkedIn
sends unsolicited invitation emails to non-members, if not responding, re- prompts. I have already received 2 invitations from you, which you probably did not even initiate. ((:-)) It is interesting, to an e-mail address, which I used perhaps 1 or 2 times provided. LinkedIn probably read your e-mail history. I think there are no serious social networks in this world. Maik Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2019, 11:47:02 CET schrieb Gilles Caulier: > Hi all users, > > Due to Google+ shutdown in few weeks (thank Google for the support in long > term), I tried to found a professional social network alternative, more > serious than Facebook, and enough mature. As i'm registered to LinkedIn > since a while without to use it really, I explored better this area to > discover the Open Source community and i was surprised to see that mostly > all my contacts was already registered in this social network. > > So, i created a new digiKam users group to LinkedIn : > > https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12186015/ > > If you have an account to this social network, you can join the game. > > Best > > Gilles Caulier |
|
|
I like discuss.pixls.us It is mobile friendly and it allows to reply via email. Plus there are many photographers over there already. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> Date: 2019-01-22 3:48 PM (GMT-05:00) To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] LinkedIn user group... sends unsolicited invitation emails to non-members, if not responding, re- prompts. I have already received 2 invitations from you, which you probably did not even initiate. ((:-)) It is interesting, to an e-mail address, which I used perhaps 1 or 2 times provided. LinkedIn probably read your e-mail history. I think there are no serious social networks in this world. Maik Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2019, 11:47:02 CET schrieb Gilles Caulier: > Hi all users, > > Due to Google+ shutdown in few weeks (thank Google for the support in long > term), I tried to found a professional social network alternative, more > serious than Facebook, and enough mature. As i'm registered to LinkedIn > since a while without to use it really, I explored better this area to > discover the Open Source community and i was surprised to see that mostly > all my contacts was already registered in this social network. > > So, i created a new digiKam users group to LinkedIn : > > https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12186015/ > > If you have an account to this social network, you can join the game. > > Best > > Gilles Caulier |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:52:52 -0500
Andrey Goreev <[hidden email]> wrote: > I like discuss.pixls.us It is mobile friendly and it > allows to reply via email.Plus there are many photographers over > there already. +1 for discuss.pixls.us. There's good help for Rawtherapee & Darktable (I use these) + there are already a bunch of other forums open-source. Thanks Syv > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original > message --------From: Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> Date: > 2019-01-22 3:48 PM (GMT-05:00) To: digiKam - Home Manage your > photographs as a professional with the power of open source > <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] LinkedIn user > group... I asked the German Wikipedia for LinkedIn, especially the > criticism. LinkedIn sends unsolicited invitation emails to > non-members, if not responding, re- prompts. I have already > received 2 invitations from you, which you probably did not even > initiate. ((:-)) It is interesting, to an e-mail address, which I > used perhaps 1 or 2 times provided. LinkedIn probably read your > e-mail history. I think there are no serious social networks in > this world. > > Maik > > Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2019, 11:47:02 CET schrieb Gilles Caulier: > > Hi all users, > > > > Due to Google+ shutdown in few weeks (thank Google for the > > support in long term), I tried to found a professional social > > network alternative, more serious than Facebook, and enough > > mature. As i'm registered to LinkedIn since a while without to > > use it really, I explored better this area to discover the Open > > Source community and i was surprised to see that mostly all my > > contacts was already registered in this social network. > > > > So, i created a new digiKam users group to LinkedIn : > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12186015/ > > > > If you have an account to this social network, you can join the > > game. > > > > Best > > > > Gilles Caulier > > > > -- sknahT vyS |
|
|
In reply to this post by Maik Qualmann
> I asked the German Wikipedia for LinkedIn, especially the criticism. LinkedIn
> sends unsolicited invitation emails to non-members, if not responding, re- > prompts. I have already received 2 invitations from you, which you probably > did not even initiate. ((:-)) It is interesting, to an e-mail address, which I > used perhaps 1 or 2 times provided. LinkedIn probably read your e-mail > history. I think there are no serious social networks in this world. Hi, I fully agree. When I was on LinkedIn, I saw in my "proposed contacts" at least one people I didn't want to see(for personnal and complicated reasons I won't reveal here). The only way to make the link was to read her address book(or worse). I write "worse" because, yes, I couldn't think they could do such a thing than reading mail, but I read or heard something about this. I though it was on this list but after verification, it seems not. It was about an attorney service. They don't have the right to talk to the opposite side, or it could create very bigs problems. However, the opposite side received an invitation to join this attorney's network. It created huge problems, they had much work to calm the hurricane it made in the justice institutions. The only way to make the link between both of them was to read mails where opposite side's adress was written in the attorney box. I closed my account(after having send a mail to my contacts that probably did have no effect) when I realized that this site with a professional layer were in fact just like the other ones and I don't understand why so much activist geeks are on it, especially because I don't have the feeling that employers use it so much in france(but I may be wrong). -- Sincerely, Stephane Ascoet |
|
|
On mercredi 23 janvier 2019 08:13:30 CET Stephane Ascoet wrote:
> > I asked the German Wikipedia for LinkedIn, especially the criticism. > > LinkedIn sends unsolicited invitation emails to non-members, if not > > responding, re- prompts. I have already received 2 invitations from you, > > which you probably did not even initiate. ((:-)) It is interesting, to an > > e-mail address, which I used perhaps 1 or 2 times provided. LinkedIn > > probably read your e-mail history. I think there are no serious social > > networks in this world. > Hi, I fully agree. When I was on LinkedIn, I saw in my "proposed > contacts" at least one people I didn't want to see(for personnal and > complicated reasons I won't reveal here). The only way to make the link > was to read her address book(or worse). I write "worse" because, yes, I > couldn't think they could do such a thing than reading mail, but I read > or heard something about this. I though it was on this list but after > verification, it seems not. It was about an attorney service. They don't > have the right to talk to the opposite side, or it could create very > bigs problems. However, the opposite side received an invitation to join > this attorney's network. It created huge problems, they had much work to > calm the hurricane it made in the justice institutions. The only way to > make the link between both of them was to read mails where opposite > side's adress was written in the attorney box. > > I closed my account(after having send a mail to my contacts that > probably did have no effect) when I realized that this site with a > professional layer were in fact just like the other ones and I don't > understand why so much activist geeks are on it, especially because I > don't have the feeling that employers use it so much in france(but I may > be wrong). LinkedIn indeed tend(ed) to spam others, based at least on the address book of members. To the best of my knowledge, I do not have an account on LinkedIn. They seem to agree, as I used to get regular invites to join LinkedIn, supposedly from members/through members. Although that practice seems to have calmed down lately. So, please do not replace this list by anything like LinkedIn, until such methods are abolished. Remco |
|
|
it looks like pixel.us runs a https://www.discourse.org/ instance,
that's great :), the only thing what is missing is the mobile API to access it with https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.discourse. On 23.01.2019 09:11, Remco Viëtor wrote: > On mercredi 23 janvier 2019 08:13:30 CET Stephane Ascoet wrote: >>> I asked the German Wikipedia for LinkedIn, especially the criticism. >>> LinkedIn sends unsolicited invitation emails to non-members, if not >>> responding, re- prompts. I have already received 2 invitations from you, >>> which you probably did not even initiate. ((:-)) It is interesting, to an >>> e-mail address, which I used perhaps 1 or 2 times provided. LinkedIn >>> probably read your e-mail history. I think there are no serious social >>> networks in this world. >> Hi, I fully agree. When I was on LinkedIn, I saw in my "proposed >> contacts" at least one people I didn't want to see(for personnal and >> complicated reasons I won't reveal here). The only way to make the link >> was to read her address book(or worse). I write "worse" because, yes, I >> couldn't think they could do such a thing than reading mail, but I read >> or heard something about this. I though it was on this list but after >> verification, it seems not. It was about an attorney service. They don't >> have the right to talk to the opposite side, or it could create very >> bigs problems. However, the opposite side received an invitation to join >> this attorney's network. It created huge problems, they had much work to >> calm the hurricane it made in the justice institutions. The only way to >> make the link between both of them was to read mails where opposite >> side's adress was written in the attorney box. >> >> I closed my account(after having send a mail to my contacts that >> probably did have no effect) when I realized that this site with a >> professional layer were in fact just like the other ones and I don't >> understand why so much activist geeks are on it, especially because I >> don't have the feeling that employers use it so much in france(but I may >> be wrong). > LinkedIn indeed tend(ed) to spam others, based at least on the address book of > members. > To the best of my knowledge, I do not have an account on LinkedIn. They seem > to agree, as I used to get regular invites to join LinkedIn, supposedly from > members/through members. Although that practice seems to have calmed down > lately. > > So, please do not replace this list by anything like LinkedIn, until such > methods are abolished. > > Remco > > |
|
|
According to reviews this app is just a webview of discourse. Which
isn't bad, but you can just as well open it in your favorite mobile browser (which works pretty well, apart from the terrible typing, which is unrelated :) ). On 23/01/2019 09:27, Stefan Müller wrote: > it looks like pixel.us runs a https://www.discourse.org/ instance, > that's great :), the only thing what is missing is the mobile API to > access it with > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.discourse. > > > On 23.01.2019 09:11, Remco Viëtor wrote: >> On mercredi 23 janvier 2019 08:13:30 CET Stephane Ascoet wrote: >>>> I asked the German Wikipedia for LinkedIn, especially the criticism. >>>> LinkedIn sends unsolicited invitation emails to non-members, if not >>>> responding, re- prompts. I have already received 2 invitations from >>>> you, >>>> which you probably did not even initiate. ((:-)) It is interesting, >>>> to an >>>> e-mail address, which I used perhaps 1 or 2 times provided. LinkedIn >>>> probably read your e-mail history. I think there are no serious social >>>> networks in this world. >>> Hi, I fully agree. When I was on LinkedIn, I saw in my "proposed >>> contacts" at least one people I didn't want to see(for personnal and >>> complicated reasons I won't reveal here). The only way to make the link >>> was to read her address book(or worse). I write "worse" because, yes, I >>> couldn't think they could do such a thing than reading mail, but I read >>> or heard something about this. I though it was on this list but after >>> verification, it seems not. It was about an attorney service. They >>> don't >>> have the right to talk to the opposite side, or it could create very >>> bigs problems. However, the opposite side received an invitation to >>> join >>> this attorney's network. It created huge problems, they had much >>> work to >>> calm the hurricane it made in the justice institutions. The only way to >>> make the link between both of them was to read mails where opposite >>> side's adress was written in the attorney box. >>> >>> I closed my account(after having send a mail to my contacts that >>> probably did have no effect) when I realized that this site with a >>> professional layer were in fact just like the other ones and I don't >>> understand why so much activist geeks are on it, especially because I >>> don't have the feeling that employers use it so much in france(but I >>> may >>> be wrong). >> LinkedIn indeed tend(ed) to spam others, based at least on the >> address book of >> members. >> To the best of my knowledge, I do not have an account on LinkedIn. >> They seem >> to agree, as I used to get regular invites to join LinkedIn, >> supposedly from >> members/through members. Although that practice seems to have calmed >> down >> lately. >> >> So, please do not replace this list by anything like LinkedIn, until >> such >> methods are abolished. >> >> Remco >> >> |
|
|
[hidden email] what do you think about pixel.us @Simon Frei, writing is a bit more comfortable in the app but the main point is, that you have all your discourse in on app, easily accessible and notification pop up only there if you want (as I want) Le mer. 23 janv. 2019 à 09:34, Simon Frei <[hidden email]> a écrit : According to reviews this app is just a webview of discourse. Which |
|
|
We'd love to have all you wonderful people on pixls.us! I'd like to think we are a less creepy platform than LinkedIn as well. We have the social login feature and a bunch of good people!
- mica On January 23, 2019 11:34:10 PM PST, Stefan Mueller <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
|
|
I mean, LinkedIn is a reasonably large social network for work-oriented stuff, so it certainly can't hurt to have a presence there. (I hate Facebook, but there's no denying there's a large potential for outreach there). Besides, many folks responding in this thread are already pretty active on pixls.us. :) If you're not, come join us! On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 2:02 AM Mica Semrick <[hidden email]> wrote:
https://patdavid.net GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D 18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC |
|
|
Le 24/01/2019 à 16:05, Pat David a écrit :
> there). Besides, many folks responding in this thread are already > pretty active on pixls.us <http://pixls.us>. :) If you're not, come > join us! I just did and it seems pixels.us already have my photo. This account being new I wonder how (I used mail to validate account :-) see you there jdd -- http://dodin.org |
|
|
jdd - you have previously used this image as a Gravatar (https://en.gravatar.com/), so using the same email we find the gravatar you've publicly uploaded (at some point in the past) to that service. Welcome aboard! :) Le 24/01/2019 à 16:05, Pat David a écrit : https://patdavid.net GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D 18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC |
|
|
Le 24/01/2019 à 16:21, Pat David a écrit :
> jdd - you have previously used this image as a Gravatar > (https://en.gravatar.com/), so using the same email we find the gravatar > you've publicly uploaded (at some point in the past) to that service. oh, yes, may be, this image is also on my web site, but it's the first time I see it used automatically, great :-) > Welcome aboard! :) > https://discuss.pixls.us/c/software/digikam > > bookmarked :-) thanks jdd -- http://dodin.org |
|
|
In reply to this post by Mica Semrick
OK, I have just been playing about with https://discuss.pixls.us/
My problem with it is mainly that it seems to be just a forum. I can find no way to subscribe to a category in order to get emails for new topics. This makes it a pull only website. That is too much trouble for me. I need push so that things I want to know about get sent to me and land in my email inbox. I have better things to do than visit a bunch of websites, click refresh on each and try to work out what has changed. Or am I missing something? Otherwise it all looks good. There is useful stuff on there. Andrew On 24/01/2019 08:02, Mica Semrick wrote: > We'd love to have all you wonderful people on pixls.us! I'd like to > think we are a less creepy platform than LinkedIn as well. We have the > social login feature and a bunch of good people! > > - mica > > On January 23, 2019 11:34:10 PM PST, Stefan Mueller > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > @Gilles Caulier <mailto:[hidden email]> what do you think > about pixel.us <http://pixel.us> > @Simon Frei, writing is a bit more comfortable in the app but the > main point is, that you have all your discourse in on app, easily > accessible and notification pop up only there if you want (as I want) > > Le mer. 23 janv. 2019 à 09:34, Simon Frei <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> a écrit : > > According to reviews this app is just a webview of discourse. Which > isn't bad, but you can just as well open it in your favorite mobile > browser (which works pretty well, apart from the terrible > typing, which > is unrelated :) ). > > On 23/01/2019 09:27, Stefan Müller wrote: > > it looks like pixel.us <http://pixel.us> runs a > https://www.discourse.org/ instance, > > that's great :), the only thing what is missing is the mobile > API to > > access it with > > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.discourse. > > > > > > On 23.01.2019 09:11, Remco Viëtor wrote: > >> On mercredi 23 janvier 2019 08:13:30 CET Stephane Ascoet wrote: > >>>> I asked the German Wikipedia for LinkedIn, especially the > criticism. > >>>> LinkedIn sends unsolicited invitation emails to > non-members, if not > >>>> responding, re- prompts. I have already received 2 > invitations from > >>>> you, > >>>> which you probably did not even initiate. ((:-)) It is > interesting, > >>>> to an > >>>> e-mail address, which I used perhaps 1 or 2 times > provided. LinkedIn > >>>> probably read your e-mail history. I think there are no > serious social > >>>> networks in this world. > >>> Hi, I fully agree. When I was on LinkedIn, I saw in my > "proposed > >>> contacts" at least one people I didn't want to see(for > personnal and > >>> complicated reasons I won't reveal here). The only way to > make the link > >>> was to read her address book(or worse). I write "worse" > because, yes, I > >>> couldn't think they could do such a thing than reading > mail, but I read > >>> or heard something about this. I though it was on this list > but after > >>> verification, it seems not. It was about an attorney > service. They > >>> don't > >>> have the right to talk to the opposite side, or it could > create very > >>> bigs problems. However, the opposite side received an > invitation to > >>> join > >>> this attorney's network. It created huge problems, they had > much > >>> work to > >>> calm the hurricane it made in the justice institutions. The > only way to > >>> make the link between both of them was to read mails where > opposite > >>> side's adress was written in the attorney box. > >>> > >>> I closed my account(after having send a mail to my contacts > that > >>> probably did have no effect) when I realized that this site > with a > >>> professional layer were in fact just like the other ones > and I don't > >>> understand why so much activist geeks are on it, especially > because I > >>> don't have the feeling that employers use it so much in > france(but I > >>> may > >>> be wrong). > >> LinkedIn indeed tend(ed) to spam others, based at least on the > >> address book of > >> members. > >> To the best of my knowledge, I do not have an account on > LinkedIn. > >> They seem > >> to agree, as I used to get regular invites to join LinkedIn, > >> supposedly from > >> members/through members. Although that practice seems to > have calmed > >> down > >> lately. > >> > >> So, please do not replace this list by anything like > LinkedIn, until > >> such > >> methods are abolished. > >> > >> Remco > >> > >> > |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |