[digiKam-users] Is this the correct appimage?
Locked
 
|
The digikam-6.1.0-git-20190317T144548-x86-64.appimage
File information Filename: digikam-6.1.0-git-20190317T144548-x86-64.appimage Path: /digikam/digikam-6.1.0-git-20190317T144548-x86-64.appimage Size: 78M (81788928 bytes) Last modified: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 13:51:33 GMT (Unix time: 1552830693) It's only 78Mb. It was always in 400Mb range https://i.imgur.com/gmmIBJE.png -- sknahT vyS |
Re: Is this the correct appimage?
|
|
Current appimage 6.1.0 is broken. do not use it... Gilles Caulier Le lun. 18 mars 2019 à 01:30, <[hidden email]> a écrit : The digikam-6.1.0-git-20190317T144548-x86-64.appimage |
Re: Is this the correct appimage?
|
|
Hi all, 32 bits is compiling. It take more than 6 hours to be completed. After 3 weeks of intensive tests, i completed these updates : - Qt 5.9.7 => Qt 5.11.3 (I tried last Qt 5.12.2, but it more complex than expected. So i delay this task for later...) - QtWebkit 5.9.1 => 5.212 : this one is used to show geolocation view with GoogleMap. I tried to migrate to QWebEngine, but the puzzle is just enormous. So i delayed with 5.12.2 migration stage. - openssl : last stable version is used and Qt is hard linked with it. So typically the SSL connection with webservices must be fixed now. - ffmpeg 3.3.3 => 3.3.9. I delay later to migrate to 4.1.x, has it's introduce more complex dependencies to solve. - OpenCV 3.4.5 is now compiled with the most small fingerprint to prevent unexpected crash in Face Management. I disabled all optimizations (CUDA, OpenCL, OpenMP, etc...), and only compiled only the sub components required by digiKam to prevent side-effects. This library is really a monster with plenty of options usable at configuration time. I hope that all unresolved symbols at start up will be fixed now. If not, let's me here. Best Gilles Caulier Le lun. 18 mars 2019 à 04:55, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
|
|
Hi Gilles,
Yes, it's working, albeit a little bit slower and no unresolved symbols during the start up. Kernel: 4.19.28-1-MANJARO x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.13.2git-UNKNOWN Distro: Manjaro Linux Merci Syv On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:50:59 +0100 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi all, > > The AppImage 6.1.0 pre-release is back. Only for 64 bits for the > moment... > > https://files.kde.org/digikam/ > > 32 bits is compiling. It take more than 6 hours to be completed. > > After 3 weeks of intensive tests, i completed these updates : > > - Qt 5.9.7 => Qt 5.11.3 (I tried last Qt 5.12.2, but it more > complex than expected. So i delay this task for later...) > - QtWebkit 5.9.1 => 5.212 : this one is used to show geolocation > view with GoogleMap. I tried to migrate to QWebEngine, but the > puzzle is just enormous. So i delayed with 5.12.2 migration stage. > - openssl : last stable version is used and Qt is hard linked with > it. So typically the SSL connection with webservices must be fixed > now. > - ffmpeg 3.3.3 => 3.3.9. I delay later to migrate to 4.1.x, has it's > introduce more complex dependencies to solve. > - OpenCV 3.4.5 is now compiled with the most small fingerprint to > prevent unexpected crash in Face Management. I disabled all > optimizations (CUDA, OpenCL, OpenMP, etc...), and only compiled > only the sub components required by digiKam to prevent > side-effects. This library is really a monster with plenty of > options usable at configuration time. > > I hope that all unresolved symbols at start up will be fixed now. > If not, let's me here. > > Best > > Gilles Caulier > > > > > > > Le lun. 18 mars 2019 à 04:55, Gilles Caulier > <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > > Current appimage 6.1.0 is broken. do not use it... > > > > Gilles Caulier > > > > Le lun. 18 mars 2019 à 01:30, <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > > >> The digikam-6.1.0-git-20190317T144548-x86-64.appimage > >> > >> File information > >> > >> Filename: digikam-6.1.0-git-20190317T144548-x86-64.appimage > >> Path: /digikam/digikam-6.1.0-git-20190317T144548-x86-64.appimage > >> Size: 78M (81788928 bytes) > >> Last modified: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 13:51:33 GMT (Unix time: > >> 1552830693) > >> > >> > >> It's only 78Mb. It was always in 400Mb range > >> > >> https://i.imgur.com/gmmIBJE.png > >> > >> -- > >> sknahT > >> > >> vyS > >> > > -- sknahT vyS |
Re: Is this the correct appimage?
|
|
Hi all, After one night of compilation, the Linux AppImage 32 bits for 6.1.0 pre-release is now online... This take age, because QtWebkit 5.212 is not optimized to compile and link on 32 bits platform. I restarted the compilation 3 times due to a linker memory overflow. Each QtWebkit take 2 hours to be completed, and of course the error come at 100%. This is the Murphy law... I currently start to investigate to the alternative QtWebEngine to replace QtWebkit definitively... Gilles Caulier Le mer. 20 mars 2019 à 18:55, <[hidden email]> a écrit : Hi Gilles, |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |