[digiKam-users] Face Detection/Tagging thoughts

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[digiKam-users] Face Detection/Tagging thoughts

Rob D
I see that some new work flow is in the works for the faces work flow (GSoC 2020) . I have a few thoughts on what I would like to see.

My comments are based on how I understand things to work, so I could be off base.

1) Currently, if a face is detected, I have the option of tagging the face as "not a face", giving it a name, or just leaving it as it currently is. I would like to see an option that leaves the face, but ignores it as it is someone I really don't care about at this time (if ever) If faces tagged as not a face are used to re-train face detection, that is probably not a good thing.

2) If a face is recognised, but incorrect, I'd like to say the person is incorrect and feed that back into the training data.

3) If I manually add a face, it means that face detection didn't detect the face. It should be remembered that it was added manually and not be used to train. Sometimes I like to add "faces" into my photos that would make really poor data to train on (obscured faces, mostly turned away, etc)

4) Re-training the recognition database should also ignore previously manually added faces. I'd also like to see an option to re-train with just the initial database in case the currently detected faces represent as a whole poor candidates. I've been using Digikam for many years and I'll be honest, there is a lot of crap in my faces database. The ability to start re-training from scratch without throwing out my current faces seems like it would be a big help for future recognition attempts.

Rob
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Face Detection/Tagging thoughts

woenx
Hi Rob,

Regarding the first comment, It is something that users have mentioned from
time to time, and I believe that option is planned as part of the Google
Summer of code 2020
(https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/projects/#5879432172011520) . So with a
bit of luck we may see it implemented after summer.

About the other questions, I am not really an expert, but if the algorithm
has not been able to recognize a face now, it doesn't mean that it won't in
the future if it improves. I already have thousands of tagged faces from
other picture managers, and I think digikam should be able to use that
existing information to recognize future faces. Nevertheless, the face
recognition function does not work very well for me and most suggestions
seem like completely random. I guess I have too many people in there.



--
Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html