Hey there,
I have noticed that the Photograph Properties don't display photograph's Aperture and Exposure correctly - both are "unavailable". If I look up the photo in DigiKam core DB and view ImageMetadata, the aperture and exposureTime fields have correct values. Anyone else noticed that? It seems that the Aperture is displayed correctly if it has an integer value (p.e. 4, 5, 16) but not if it is decimal (p.e. 1.8, 6.3). Thanks. -- Robert Valík https://robert.valik.sk/ Sent from my MUA Screenshot_20180901_094633_digikam_metadata.png (53K) Download Attachment Screenshot_20180901_094709_DB.png (17K) Download Attachment signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment |
Hi, Gilles Caulier 2018-09-01 9:54 GMT+02:00 VALÍK Robert <[hidden email]>: Hey there, |
Hey,
it is not "image specific" - the database seems to be OK. Every image with non-integer Aperture has the "unavailable" - doesn't matter if it is from RAW from DLSR or JPEG from iPhone. Even images that were OK in the 5.9.0 are affected. When I get home, I will provide an image. Robert On 2018-09-01 10:19, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Hi, > > There is no reason for that. Can you share the image to test here on my > computer. I will try to reproduce the problem. > > Gilles Caulier > > 2018-09-01 9:54 GMT+02:00 VALÍK Robert <[hidden email]>: > > > Hey there, > > > > I have noticed that the Photograph Properties don't display photograph's > > Aperture and Exposure correctly - both are "unavailable". > > > > If I look up the photo in DigiKam core DB and view ImageMetadata, the > > aperture and exposureTime fields have correct values. Anyone else > > noticed that? > > > > It seems that the Aperture is displayed correctly if it has an integer > > value (p.e. 4, 5, 16) but not if it is decimal (p.e. 1.8, 6.3). > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > Robert Valík > > https://robert.valik.sk/ > > > > Sent from my MUA > > Robert Valík https://robert.valik.sk/ Sent from my MUA signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Forgot to mention, I use Slovak locale - we use comma separated decimal
(2,8) places instead of dot (2.8). On 2018-09-01 10:19, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Hi, > > There is no reason for that. Can you share the image to test here on my > computer. I will try to reproduce the problem. > > Gilles Caulier > > 2018-09-01 9:54 GMT+02:00 VALÍK Robert <[hidden email]>: > > > Hey there, > > > > I have noticed that the Photograph Properties don't display photograph's > > Aperture and Exposure correctly - both are "unavailable". > > > > If I look up the photo in DigiKam core DB and view ImageMetadata, the > > aperture and exposureTime fields have correct values. Anyone else > > noticed that? > > > > It seems that the Aperture is displayed correctly if it has an integer > > value (p.e. 4, 5, 16) but not if it is decimal (p.e. 1.8, 6.3). > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > Robert Valík > > https://robert.valik.sk/ > > > > Sent from my MUA > > Robert Valík https://robert.valik.sk/ Sent from my MUA signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by VALÍK Robert
MySQL and AppImage? We have a locale problem with converting to a double value by comma or dot. The problem could not be solved yet. It depends on their set system locale. Maik VALÍK Robert <[hidden email]> schrieb am Sa., 1. Sep. 2018 10:46: Hey, |
Hello,
thanks for clarification. Starting digikam using: LC_NUMERIC="en_US" ~/Applications/DigiKam/digikam.appimage Seems to be a workaround for me for now. Thanks. Robert On 2018-09-01 10:55, Maik Qualmann wrote: > MySQL and AppImage? We have a locale problem with converting to a double > value by comma or dot. The problem could not be solved yet. It depends on > their set system locale. > > Maik > > VALÍK Robert <[hidden email]> schrieb am Sa., 1. Sep. 2018 10:46: > > > Hey, > > > > it is not "image specific" - the database seems to be OK. Every image > > with non-integer Aperture has the "unavailable" - doesn't matter if it > > is from RAW from DLSR or JPEG from iPhone. > > > > Even images that were OK in the 5.9.0 are affected. > > > > When I get home, I will provide an image. > > > > Robert > > > > On 2018-09-01 10:19, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > There is no reason for that. Can you share the image to test here on my > > > computer. I will try to reproduce the problem. > > > > > > Gilles Caulier > > > > > > 2018-09-01 9:54 GMT+02:00 VALÍK Robert <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > Hey there, > > > > > > > > I have noticed that the Photograph Properties don't display > > photograph's > > > > Aperture and Exposure correctly - both are "unavailable". > > > > > > > > If I look up the photo in DigiKam core DB and view ImageMetadata, the > > > > aperture and exposureTime fields have correct values. Anyone else > > > > noticed that? > > > > > > > > It seems that the Aperture is displayed correctly if it has an integer > > > > value (p.e. 4, 5, 16) but not if it is decimal (p.e. 1.8, 6.3). > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Robert Valík > > > > https://robert.valik.sk/ > > > > > > > > Sent from my MUA > > > > > > > > -- > > Robert Valík > > https://robert.valik.sk/ > > > > Sent from my MUA > > Robert Valík https://robert.valik.sk/ Sent from my MUA signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment |
This post was updated on .
In reply to this post by VALÍK Robert
Talking about "not showed" properties, I miss compression format in TIFF
files. It's important to know if image file is compressed or not. Nowadays I need to add to the name info about kind of compression (internal archive). My personal TIFF photos are compressed, but for work, it should be stored without any kind of compression, so for me it's important to show that file info. Thank you -- Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |