The background to this request for help is that I have two sets of images which may in fact be the same but have been downloaded differently from camera or copied from camera and/or memory card and transferred. I now have to sort them out!
Certainly some of the pictures appear to be the same but I have no idea which is the "best" in terms of resolution and completeness of original camera metadata. I have several hundred files to deal with. I know that digiKam can help here but would appreciate some help in doing this please as I am very new to digikam. Budge |
Hi Budge, In my opinion this is indeed a very common use case. But alas DK is currently not really helpful with this. I do think this is indeed a difficult problem to work on. And multiple dialogs may be needed. I really hope the devs want to give this priority. I will gladly help with designing the UI/UX if the help is wanted. What I currently do is use the 'jdupes' tool to identify files that are exactly identical and then delete duplicates. Then I have to use something like GwenView or similar to compare each duplicate. Den lør. 5. dec. 2020 kl. 15.45 skrev Budge <[hidden email]>: The background to this request for help is that I have two sets of images which may in fact be the same but have been downloaded differently from camera or copied from camera and/or memory card and transferred. I now have to sort them out! |
Hi Thomas,
Very many thanks for the suggestion. I have installed jdupes and have been amazed. It seems to do exactly what I wanted and more! I created a testing directory with copies of the files with questioned provenance and ran it recursively without any options set just to see the results and this has immediately raised a question about the sources for the pairs of files: One set has just one directory of files. These are shown with file names that are just the date of the image;day date and ToD in hr,min & sec as in 2009-10-22_11-14-23.jpg: The other set is in annual and subdirectories for each day but the subdirectories have images numbered as in IMG_1246.JPG. I suspect they have been downloaded using different software but most of the images are duplicates. Until I become more familiar with digiKam I am going to keep one set in an archive folder separate from digiKam just in case I find some anomalies or issues with the metadata. Very many thanks again, your reply is much appreciated. Regards, Budge On 06/12/2020 12:49, Thomas D wrote: > Hi Budge, > > In my opinion this is indeed a very common use case. But alas DK is currently not really helpful with this. > I do think this is indeed a difficult problem to work on. And multiple dialogs may be needed. I really hope the devs want to give this priority. I will gladly help with designing the UI/UX if the help is wanted. > > What I currently do is use the 'jdupes' tool to identify files that are exactly identical and then delete duplicates. Then I have to use something like GwenView or similar to compare each duplicate. > > > Den lør. 5. dec. 2020 kl. 15.45 skrev Budge <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>: > > The background to this request for help is that I have two sets of images which may in fact be the same but have been downloaded differently from camera or copied from camera and/or memory card and transferred. I now have to sort them out! > > Certainly some of the pictures appear to be the same but I have no idea which is the "best" in terms of resolution and completeness of original camera metadata. I have several hundred files to deal with. > > I know that digiKam can help here but would appreciate some help in doing this please as I am very new to digikam. > Budge > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |