digiKam 2.5.0: missing photos

[Aleck Mueller]

Because I use LTS (Mint KDE 13) with its standard repositories and not
an expert in Linux system administration.

13.01.2014 23:01, Marie-Noëlle Augendre пишет:
> Why don't you upgrade Digikam?

--
Aleck

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[tosca]

I'm no expert either. But I wouldn't dream so stay with a distro that is so far behind!

I began with Ubuntu, that was always 2 releases behind; so I switched to Fedora several years ago, and can now benefit from stable versions at most 10 days after they're released, for whatever program I use regularly (Digikam, but also Darktable, Scribus and such).

Marie-Noëlle

2014/1/14 Aleck Mueller <[hidden email]>

Because I use LTS (Mint KDE 13) with its standard repositories and not an expert in Linux system administration.

13.01.2014 23:01, Marie-Noëlle Augendre пишет:

Why don't you upgrade Digikam?

--
Aleck

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

--

Retrouvez mon portfolio et mes activités dans ma galerie personnelle, mes reportages sur Jingoo

Et bien sûr la page Photographe en Cévennes sur FB, et mon compte Twitter.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Another alternaive is Magiea Linux which is always up to date, because digiKam tarball packager work in digiKa team...

This is the distro that i use everywhere. Simple and suitable.

http://www.mageia.org/en/

Gilles Caulier

2014/1/14 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>

I'm no expert either. But I wouldn't dream so stay with a distro that is so far behind!

I began with Ubuntu, that was always 2 releases behind; so I switched to Fedora several years ago, and can now benefit from stable versions at most 10 days after they're released, for whatever program I use regularly (Digikam, but also Darktable, Scribus and such).

Marie-Noëlle

2014/1/14 Aleck Mueller <[hidden email]>

Because I use LTS (Mint KDE 13) with its standard repositories and not an expert in Linux system administration.

13.01.2014 23:01, Marie-Noëlle Augendre пишет:

Why don't you upgrade Digikam?

--
Aleck

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

--

Retrouvez mon portfolio et mes activités dans ma galerie personnelle, mes reportages sur Jingoo

Et bien sûr la page Photographe en Cévennes sur FB, et mon compte Twitter.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Aleck Mueller]

Well, I quite see your point.

But just that very machine must do the restricted range of tasks (for
example, running LATEX) and I am not sure the OS on it will be upgraded
even when LTS is expired (we shall have entirely different machines then).

By the way, has the namely subject problem fixed in digiKam 3.5?

14.01.2014 19:05, Marie-Noëlle Augendre пишет:
> I'm no expert either. But I wouldn't dream so stay with a distro that
> is so far behind!
> I began with Ubuntu, that was always 2 releases behind; so I switched
> to Fedora several years ago, and can now benefit from stable versions
> at most 10 days after they're released, for whatever program I use
> regularly (Digikam, but also Darktable, Scribus and such).

--
Aleck

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Aleck Mueller]

Alan Cox about:
fedora
ubuntu

14.01.2014 19:05, Marie-Noëlle Augendre пишет:

I began with Ubuntu, that was always 2 releases behind; so I switched to Fedora several years ago

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Sveinn í Felli-2]

One can get DigiKam 3.3 from Kubuntu-backports:
<https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/backports>

To install, open a terminal and enter:
        sudo add-apt-repository ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports
then:
        sudo apt-get update
Should be a bunch of KDE-stuff for upgrading.

P.S: Recently, Clem sort of recommended on the Mint blog to
add backports of standard repositories for Mint 13LTS (one
tick-mark in repository setup), to benefit from a busload of
features not available othervise. Probably wise to do so if
you use Cinnamon or Mate.

Regards,
Sveinn í Felli

Þann þri 14.jan 2014 12:40, skrifaði Aleck Mueller:
> Because I use LTS (Mint KDE 13) with its standard
> repositories and not an expert in Linux system administration.
> 13.01.2014 23:01, Marie-Noëlle Augendre пишет:
>> Why don't you upgrade Digikam?
>


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Aleck Mueller]

Thanks a lot for interesting details.
I use KDE version of Mint 13.

15.01.2014 00:32, Sveinn í Felli пишет:

> One can get DigiKam 3.3 from Kubuntu-backports:
> <https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/backports>
>
> To install, open a terminal and enter:
>     sudo add-apt-repository ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports
> then:
>     sudo apt-get update
> Should be a bunch of KDE-stuff for upgrading.
>
> P.S: Recently, Clem sort of recommended on the Mint blog to add
> backports of standard repositories for Mint 13LTS (one tick-mark in
> repository setup), to benefit from a busload of features not available
> othervise. Probably wise to do so if you use Cinnamon or Mate.

--
Aleck

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[maderios]

On 01/14/2014 05:59 PM, Aleck Mueller wrote:
> Alan Cox about:
> fedora <https://plus.google.com/u/0/111104121194250082892/posts/aCiB7kTLXTh>
> ubuntu <https://plus.google.com/u/0/111104121194250082892/posts/5HjfiwmW7HT>
>
Hi
I use Digikam 2.6 with mysql (extern server), 30 000 pictures, Debian
Wheezy (stable). It works fine.  I prefer to stay with 2.6 because 3.5
is not stable enough for me (professional use).
Regards

--
Maderios


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Aleck Mueller]

Thank you for the information very valuable for me.

15.01.2014 01:02, maderios пишет:
> I use Digikam 2.6 with mysql (extern server), 30 000 pictures, Debian
> Wheezy (stable). It works fine. I prefer to stay with 2.6 because 3.5
> is not stable enough for me (professional use).

--
Aleck

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users