digiKam 0.9.5, digiKam 0.10.0, and kipi-plugins 0.2.0 tarballs ready to test...

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Hi all,

"Et Voilà". Champagne guy !

Final relase tarballs are ready to test before to post files on sourceforge.net.

- digiKam 0.9.5 : http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.9.x-releases/digikam-0.9.5.tar.bz2

- digiKam 0.10.0 : http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-0.10.0.tar.bz2

- kipi-plugins 0.2.0 : http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/kipi-plugins-0.2.0.tar.bz2

Let's me hear if all compile fine on your computers.

Thanks in advance

Gilles Caulier

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Marcel, Andi,

As digiKam 0.10.0 tarball is done, what do you think about to move 0.11 devel branch to trunk now ?

Gilles

2009/3/16 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>

Hi all,

"Et Voilà". Champagne guy !

Final relase tarballs are ready to test before to post files on sourceforge.net.

- digiKam 0.9.5 : http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.9.x-releases/digikam-0.9.5.tar.bz2

- digiKam 0.10.0 : http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-0.10.0.tar.bz2

- kipi-plugins 0.2.0 : http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/kipi-plugins-0.2.0.tar.bz2

Let's me hear if all compile fine on your computers.

Thanks in advance

Gilles Caulier

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

I think it is ok, we could move trunk to a 0.10 branch if we like, but
actually there is no need for that...

Andi

On Monday 16 March 2009 18:27:17 Gilles Caulier wrote:

> Marcel, Andi,
>
> As digiKam 0.10.0 tarball is done, what do you think about to move 0.11
> devel branch to trunk now ?
>
> Gilles
>
> 2009/3/16 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > "Et Voilà". Champagne guy !
> >
> > Final relase tarballs are ready to test before to post files on
> > sourceforge.net.
> >
> > - digiKam 0.9.5 :
> > http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.9.x-releases/digikam-0.9.5.tar.bz2
> >
> > - digiKam 0.10.0 :
> > http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-0.10.0.tar.bz2
> >
> > - kipi-plugins 0.2.0 :
> > http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/kipi-plugins-0.2.0.tar.bz2
> >
> > Let's me hear if all compile fine on your computers.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Gilles Caulier

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcel Wiesweg]

> As digiKam 0.10.0 tarball is done, what do you think about to move 0.11
> devel branch to trunk now ?

Yes, would be more according to convention to make trunk the more advanced, active development branch again. But let's announce a date a week or two in advance to clear up internal git branches for Andi and me.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

ok. i let's you manage 0.11 with trunk

but unforget that we don't need to do a 0.10.1 release. 0.11.0 is enough.

So code in trunk is frozen for me...

Gilles

2009/3/17 Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]>

> As digiKam 0.10.0 tarball is done, what do you think about to move 0.11
> devel branch to trunk now ?

Yes, would be more according to convention to make trunk the more advanced, active development branch again. But let's announce a date a week or two in advance to clear up internal git branches for Andi and me.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcel Wiesweg]

> ok. i let's you manage 0.11 with trunk
>
> but unforget that we don't need to do a 0.10.1 release. 0.11.0 is enough.

Ok...
So we need no more backports at all. Trunk will be copied to tags/0.10.0. Then we move branch-0.11 to trunk? Simply with svn mv?
Andi, what's your point of view? Should we do it on the weekend?

>
> So code in trunk is frozen for me...
>
> Gilles

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

2009/3/17 Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]>

> ok. i let's you manage 0.11 with trunk
>
> but unforget that we don't need to do a 0.10.1 release. 0.11.0 is enough.

Ok...
So we need no more backports at all. Trunk will be copied to tags/0.10.0. Then we move branch-0.11 to trunk? Simply with svn mv?

yes. 0.11 is an exact state of trunk + others improvements and BQM.

For me move trunk to tag and move 0.11 to trunk is fine
 
Gilles

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

On Tuesday 17 March 2009 21:39:18 Gilles Caulier wrote:

> 2009/3/17 Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]>
>
> > > ok. i let's you manage 0.11 with trunk
> > >
> > > but unforget that we don't need to do a 0.10.1 release. 0.11.0 is
> > > enough.
> >
> > Ok...
> > So we need no more backports at all. Trunk will be copied to
> > tags/0.10.0.Then we move branch-0.11 to trunk? Simply with svn mv?
>
> yes. 0.11 is an exact state of trunk + others improvements and BQM.

Really? Have all patches made to trunk also been ported to 0.11 branch?
If so I think we should simple copy it, because merging is going to be hell
(just tried it in my GIT repo here, after 20 minutes I nearly started to cry
:-)

Andi
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

On Tuesday 17 March 2009 21:34:26 Marcel Wiesweg wrote:
> > ok. i let's you manage 0.11 with trunk
> >
> > but unforget that we don't need to do a 0.10.1 release. 0.11.0 is enough.
>
> Ok...
> So we need no more backports at all. Trunk will be copied to tags/0.10.0.
> Then we move branch-0.11 to trunk? Simply with svn mv?
> Andi, what's your point of view? Should we do it on the weekend?

Ok... need to move some local branches to trunk repo then.
Because I will not be able to work on them until WE and commit them.
But this shouldn't be a problem.

I guess I will be only available at Sunday (more towards the evening), but
actually I don't need to be present :)

So the sum it up: We could / should move the 0.11 branch to trunk again at the
weekend...

Andi
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel