digiKam 0.9.0-beta2 and digiKamImagePlugins 0.9.0-beta2 are out there: catch them!

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

digiKam 0.9.0-beta2 and digiKamImagePlugins 0.9.0-beta2 are out there: catch them!

F.J.Cruz
Here we go again: another step beyond on the path to the first stable release
of the 0.9 series for digiKam and digikamImagePlugins.

After a period of hard and intensive work, the digiKam community brings to you
all the new digiKam and DigikamImagePlugins 0.9.0-beta2 releases with some
new features, and others have been improved:

- New option to start image sequence number index with a custom value.
 
- New option to add camera name to target download file name.
 
- New option to create download folder per file format (e.g. JPG and CR2)
 
- New option to set date format of auto-created albums.
 
- New option to process a batch creation of all albums items thumbnails.
 
- New option to set image as tag thumbnail on Tag Filters View using D&D.
 
- New option to set a matching condition to use between tags in Tag Filters
View (OR or AND condition).
 
- New color scheme theme 'Digikasa' from Sergio Di Rio Mare


 And a lot of bugs have been fixed since the 0.9.0-beta1 release:

- 121691 : Problems with Downloading images from Camera.
 
- 131034 : Display a mini-view of the photo currently transferred, i.e. better
visual feedback.
 
- 131603 : Orientation of RAW-images (especially Canons *.cr2)
 
- 131532 : Minolta exception code can break EXIF rotation
 
- 131550 : digikam/showfoto can't show jpeg image under PowerPC
 
- 131549 : endianess problem under Linux-PowerPC (with png images at least)

Do you want to know more about all the changes? Have a look at the NEWS file
[http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/NEWS?rev=582129&view=markup]  

Are you interested in some of our plans for the future and in what is still
missing for the final 0.9 release? Have a look at the TODO file
[http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/TODO?rev=579142&view=markup].

As you know, this is not an stable release but a beta one, which means that we
are asking users to test this version of digiKam and to report bugs. Now, you
have the chance to help us, if you have found a bug, please report it to the
bug tracking system at bugs.kde.org. In a first step, make sure that there is
not already a bug report for your problem. A list of open bug reports for
digikam can be found  here
[http://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?product=digikam&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED],
and for digikamimageplugins in this  URL
[http://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?product=digikamimageplugins&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED].

Come on! what are you waiting for? Get your packages  here!
[http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42641]
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam 0.9.0-beta2 and digiKamImagePlugins 0.9.0-beta2 are out there: catch them!

Amos Shapira
Better get rid of this revision in the URL's to the TODO and NEWS
files to track the latest one?

NEWS:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/NEWS?view=markup

TODO:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/TODO?view=markup

Thanks,

--Amos
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam 0.9.0-beta2 and digiKamImagePlugins 0.9.0-beta2 are out there: catch them!

Gilles Caulier-2
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 01:04, Amos Shapira wrote:

> Better get rid of this revision in the URL's to the TODO and NEWS
> files to track the latest one?
>
> NEWS:
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/NEWS?view=markup
>
> TODO:
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/TODO?view=markup
>
> Thanks,

Amos, you point to the current NEWS and TODO file witch are relevant of the
next beta3 release.

Paco point to the revision files relevant of beta2 only. And we talking about
beta2, not beta3 here (:=)))... This can be confuse to user if he see beta3
fix in NEWS file and he try beta2 tarballs.

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam 0.9.0-beta2 and digiKamImagePlugins 0.9.0-beta2 are out there: catch them!

Amos Shapira
On 20/09/06, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Paco point to the revision files relevant of beta2 only. And we talking about
> beta2, not beta3 here (:=)))... This can be confuse to user if he see beta3
> fix in NEWS file and he try beta2 tarballs.

I see.

I was more after the phrase which saind something to the effect of
"tracking NEWS and what was DONE", which wouldn't change if the URL
points to a particular file revision.

Cheers,

--Amos

--
"Military justice is to justice what military music is to music"
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam 0.9.0-beta2 and digiKamImagePlugins 0.9.0-beta2 are out there: catch them!

F.J.Cruz
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-2
El Miércoles, 20 de Septiembre de 2006 07:44, Gilles Caulier escribió:

> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 01:04, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > Better get rid of this revision in the URL's to the TODO and NEWS
> > files to track the latest one?
> >
> > NEWS:
> > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/NEWS?view=markup
> >
> > TODO:
> > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/TODO?view=markup
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> Amos, you point to the current NEWS and TODO file witch are relevant of the
> next beta3 release.
>
> Paco point to the revision files relevant of beta2 only. And we talking
> about beta2, not beta3 here (:=)))... This can be confuse to user if he see
> beta3 fix in NEWS file and he try beta2 tarballs.
>
> Gilles
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

Sorry, but I don't know what you are talking about. As you recommended to me,
I just updated the links from the last beta announce. This is my first
release and announce, so I'm not familiarized with the task. I've just tried
to follow the PACKAGING file.

I want to apologize for any problem or  confusion my errors may have caused
you.

Paco Cruz
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam 0.9.0-beta2 and digiKamImagePlugins 0.9.0-beta2 are out there: catch them!

Gilles Caulier-2
Le Mercredi 20 Septembre 2006 10:28 PM, F.J.Cruz a écrit :

> El Miércoles, 20 de Septiembre de 2006 07:44, Gilles Caulier escribió:
> > On Wednesday 20 September 2006 01:04, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > > Better get rid of this revision in the URL's to the TODO and NEWS
> > > files to track the latest one?
> > >
> > > NEWS:
> > > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/NEWS?view=markup
> > >
> > > TODO:
> > > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/TODO?view=markup
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > Amos, you point to the current NEWS and TODO file witch are relevant of
> > the next beta3 release.
> >
> > Paco point to the revision files relevant of beta2 only. And we talking
> > about beta2, not beta3 here (:=)))... This can be confuse to user if he
> > see beta3 fix in NEWS file and he try beta2 tarballs.
> >
> > Gilles
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
> Sorry, but I don't know what you are talking about. As you recommended to
> me, I just updated the links from the last beta announce. This is my first
> release and announce, so I'm not familiarized with the task. I've just
> tried to follow the PACKAGING file.
>
> I want to apologize for any problem or  confusion my errors may have caused
> you.

All is fine for me. All links point to the files tagged to the release.

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users