digiKam 0.10.0-rc1 and kipi-plugins 0.2.0-rc1 tarballs ready to test...

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Hi all,

Next digiKam and kipi-plugins beta tarballs are ready to test before to post on SF.net they are here :

http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-0.10.0-rc1.tar.bz2
http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/kipi-plugins-0.2.0-rc1.tar.bz2

Translations stats is here :

http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-l10n-0.10.0-rc1.html
http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/kipi-plugins-l10n-0.2.0-rc1.html

Thanks in advance for your feedback

Gilles Caulier
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

On Wednesday 21 January 2009 20:26:26 Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Next digiKam and kipi-plugins beta tarballs are ready to test before to
> post on SF.net they are here :
>
> http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-0.10.0-rc1.tar.bz2<h
>ttp://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-0.10.0-beta6.tar.bz2>
> http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/kipi-plugins-0.2.0
> -rc1.tar.bz2<http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-0.10.0-
>beta6.tar.bz2>

Both build fine on Ubuntu Jaunty and I am already preparing packages for Intrepid and Jaunty.

One thing that I have noticed: icons are installed in three locations:
- /usr/share/icons/hicolor,
- /usr/share/icons/oxygen
- /usr/share/apps/digikam/icons/hicolor
I cannot notice a clear pattern what is installed where. AFAIK, particularly the application icons (digikam.png and showfoto.png) should go in /usr/share/hicolor in order to be available on all desktop environments (GNOME, XFCE...). I suspect we should not ship anything in oxygen too.

See attached file for the list of all installed icons.

I have noticed some interesting warnings by debian packager in kipi-plugins and will see if we can really get rid of these linked libraries for final release:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libICE.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_imageviewer.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libkabc.so.4 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_calendar.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libGLU.so.1 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_imageviewer.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libXdmcp.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_imageviewer.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libXau.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_imageviewer.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgmodule-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_ipodexport.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libSM.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_imageviewer.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libkde3support.so.4 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_picasawebexport.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_flickrexport.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_ipodexport.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgthread-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_ipodexport.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).

> Translations stats is here :
>
> http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-l10n-0.10.0-rc1.html
><http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-l10n-0.10.0-beta6.ht
>ml> http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/kipi-plugins-l10n-0.2.0
> -rc1.html<http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-l10n-0.10.
>0-beta6.html>

I have noticed that Slovenian (sl) is not on the list of digikam translations, even though that I see there is digikam.po in SVN:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/sl/messages/extragear-graphics/

Is there something missing to include this translation?
Disclaimer: I have no clue how i18n/l10n works in KDE. ;-)

Regards,
Luka

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel