darktable sidecar files

[Martin (KDE)]

Hallo

are there any plans to support darktable sidecar files in upcoming 2.0
digikam? Afaik they use a different naming notation (complete name of
the origin file with .xmp attached). With this you can distinguish
between foo.jpg and foo.cr2 file where the sidecar files become
foo.jpg.xmp and foo.cr2.xmp

Greetings

Martin
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Gilles Caulier-4]

2011/3/7 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>:
> Hallo
>
> are there any plans to support darktable sidecar files in upcoming 2.0
> digikam? Afaik they use a different naming notation (complete name of
> the origin file with .xmp attached).

This is a standard file naming ?

Other photomanagement program work like this (as Aperture and LightRoom) ?

> With this you can distinguish
> between foo.jpg and foo.cr2 file where the sidecar files become
> foo.jpg.xmp and foo.cr2.xmp

Do you have an XMP sidecar file to take a look how darktable manage
information into XMp namespace ?

Gilles Caulier
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Marcel Wiesweg]

> > are there any plans to support darktable sidecar files in upcoming 2.0
> > digikam? Afaik they use a different naming notation (complete name of
> > the origin file with .xmp attached).
>
> This is a standard file naming ?
>
> Other photomanagement program work like this (as Aperture and LightRoom) ?

Gilles, please have a look at bug 264007!
This is a problem: It is not defined in the standard, at least, not that
anyone yet knew of.
There are good arguments in favor of using the complete basename; and in the
end we really have to see how the other apps do it.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Martin (KDE)]

Am Montag, 7. März 2011 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> 2011/3/7 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>:
> > Hallo
> >
> > are there any plans to support darktable sidecar files in
> > upcoming 2.0 digikam? Afaik they use a different naming notation
> > (complete name of the origin file with .xmp attached).
>
> This is a standard file naming ?

I don't know. darktable uses this.

>
> Other photomanagement program work like this (as Aperture and
> LightRoom) ?

I don't know either. I don't use other products than digikam,
darktable and ufraw.

>
> > With this you can distinguish
> > between foo.jpg and foo.cr2 file where the sidecar files become
> > foo.jpg.xmp and foo.cr2.xmp
>
> Do you have an XMP sidecar file to take a look how darktable manage
> information into XMp namespace ?

For sure. attached.

Martin
>
> Gilles Caulier
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Thanks martin.

Please attach this XMP file to this Bugzilla entry :

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264007

Gilles Caulier

2011/3/7 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>:

> Am Montag, 7. März 2011 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
>> 2011/3/7 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>:
>> > Hallo
>> >
>> > are there any plans to support darktable sidecar files in
>> > upcoming 2.0 digikam? Afaik they use a different naming notation
>> > (complete name of the origin file with .xmp attached).
>>
>> This is a standard file naming ?
>
> I don't know. darktable uses this.
>
>>
>> Other photomanagement program work like this (as Aperture and
>> LightRoom) ?
>
> I don't know either. I don't use other products than digikam,
> darktable and ufraw.
>
>>
>> > With this you can distinguish
>> > between foo.jpg and foo.cr2 file where the sidecar files become
>> > foo.jpg.xmp and foo.cr2.xmp
>>
>> Do you have an XMP sidecar file to take a look how darktable manage
>> information into XMp namespace ?
>
> For sure. attached.
>
> Martin
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Gilles Caulier-4]

2011/3/7 Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]>:

>
>> > are there any plans to support darktable sidecar files in upcoming 2.0
>> > digikam? Afaik they use a different naming notation (complete name of
>> > the origin file with .xmp attached).
>>
>> This is a standard file naming ?
>>
>> Other photomanagement program work like this (as Aperture and LightRoom) ?
>
> Gilles, please have a look at bug 264007!

Damned, i never see this entry....


> This is a problem: It is not defined in the standard, at least, not that
> anyone yet knew of.
> There are good arguments in favor of using the complete basename; and in the
> end we really have to see how the other apps do it.

Yes,

I will take a look how Aperture and Lightroom manage XMP sidecar  file
naming under my macbook...

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users