color profile input: a question
Locked
12
12
color profile input: a question
 
|
Hi all,
I have started playing with the color management model of Digikam 0.9. As I have recently switch to raw data picture, I'm also quite pleased with the tons of new features for that too... so a great thanks to the Digikam team! I think that I get almost all my answers in previous post, but "color profile input" are still puzzling me... I am using a Minolta 7D for my shooting and I ask the camera to work/tag in AdobeRGB mode. However their is no way I can convince Digikam to use AdobeRGB as an input mode in the Digikam "Configuration/Configure/ColorManagement" menu. It seems to wait for a camera specific icm profile. So what I do is I open the raw file, wait for the color management box to appear, manually select the input to be AdobeRGB... and that's all... however, I'm not sure I have the good workflow here ;-) Besides, when I select sRGB input profile, the result is plain ugly: gamma is false, color awful... Besides I've read from Gilles Caullier in earlier post that you were using Minolta 5D profile(??). Is this something you build specifically (shooting a patch of colors and such?)? Something you downloaded from Minolta? (Where?) Any tips for me? _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
El Jueves, 31 de Agosto de 2006 22:10, Mathusael escribió:
> Hi all, > > I have started playing with the color management model of Digikam 0.9. > As I have recently switch to raw data picture, I'm also quite pleased > with the tons of new features for that too... so a great thanks to the > Digikam team! > > I think that I get almost all my answers in previous post, but "color > profile input" are still puzzling me... I am using a Minolta 7D for my > shooting and I ask the camera to work/tag in AdobeRGB mode. However > their is no way I can convince Digikam to use AdobeRGB as an input mode > in the Digikam "Configuration/Configure/ColorManagement" menu. It seems > to wait for a camera specific icm profile. > You can't select AdobeRGB profile as input color profile because it isn't an input device class profile: it's a display device class one. > So what I do is I open the raw file, wait for the color management box > to appear, manually select the input to be AdobeRGB... and that's all... > however, I'm not sure I have the good workflow here ;-) > > Besides, when I select sRGB input profile, the result is plain ugly: > gamma is false, color awful... > Have you tray to find an input color profile for your camera model?, you could find it in software for windows whichs is packaged with the camera itself or from Bibble Pro, you can download a trial version of this app and play with the icc profiles it install. Paco Cruz. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
On Thursday 31 August 2006 22:44, F.J.Cruz wrote:
> El Jueves, 31 de Agosto de 2006 22:10, Mathusael escribió: > > > > I think that I get almost all my answers in previous post, but > > "color profile input" are still puzzling me... I am using a > > Minolta 7D for my shooting and I ask the camera to work/tag in > > AdobeRGB mode. However their is no way I can convince Digikam > > to use AdobeRGB as an input mode in the Digikam > > "Configuration/Configure/ColorManagement" menu. It seems to > > wait for a camera specific icm profile. > > You can't select AdobeRGB profile as input color profile because > it isn't an input device class profile: it's a display device > class one. But then, why can I configure my camera to save files in AdobeRGB? If I open such a file, digikam also tells me, that it is AdobeRGB embedded. Heiner -- heiner at heiner-lamprecht dot net GnuPG - Key: 9859E373 Fingerprint: 3770 7947 F917 94EF 8717 BADB 0139 7554 9859 E373 _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
Heiner Lamprecht wrote:
> On Thursday 31 August 2006 22:44, F.J.Cruz wrote: > >> El Jueves, 31 de Agosto de 2006 22:10, Mathusael escribió: >> >>> I think that I get almost all my answers in previous post, but >>> "color profile input" are still puzzling me... I am using a >>> Minolta 7D for my shooting and I ask the camera to work/tag in >>> AdobeRGB mode. However their is no way I can convince Digikam >>> to use AdobeRGB as an input mode in the Digikam >>> "Configuration/Configure/ColorManagement" menu. It seems to >>> wait for a camera specific icm profile. >>> >> You can't select AdobeRGB profile as input color profile because >> it isn't an input device class profile: it's a display device >> class one. >> > > But then, why can I configure my camera to save files in AdobeRGB? > If I open such a file, digikam also tells me, that it is AdobeRGB > embedded. > > > sharpening settings... --Tommaso > Heiner > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Heiner Lamprecht
El Jueves, 31 de Agosto de 2006 23:00, Heiner Lamprecht escribió:
> On Thursday 31 August 2006 22:44, F.J.Cruz wrote: > > El Jueves, 31 de Agosto de 2006 22:10, Mathusael escribió: > > > I think that I get almost all my answers in previous post, but > > > "color profile input" are still puzzling me... I am using a > > > Minolta 7D for my shooting and I ask the camera to work/tag in > > > AdobeRGB mode. However their is no way I can convince Digikam > > > to use AdobeRGB as an input mode in the Digikam > > > "Configuration/Configure/ColorManagement" menu. It seems to > > > wait for a camera specific icm profile. > > > > You can't select AdobeRGB profile as input color profile because > > it isn't an input device class profile: it's a display device > > class one. > > But then, why can I configure my camera to save files in AdobeRGB? > If I open such a file, digikam also tells me, that it is AdobeRGB > embedded. > > > > Heiner - Your camera is doing the conversion from and unknown profile to adobeRGB and is embedding this one into the image. - Your camera isn't doing the conversion, but it's embedding such icc profile. In my modest opinnion, if you are working with RAW images, then there is no conversion and the profiles is embedding only. On the other hand if there'd be a color transformation, if you apply a second one, the image should be showed with strange colors, i think. You can test with a transformed image, try to apply a second color transform using adobeRGB profile again an look at the result. Paco Cruz. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Vilars
Le Jeudi 31 Août 2006 22:10, Mathusael a écrit :
> Besides I've read from Gilles Caullier in earlier post that you were > using Minolta 5D profile(??). Is this something you build specifically > (shooting a patch of colors and such?)? Something you downloaded from > Minolta? (Where?) No i'm using Minolta ICC camera profile from DImage Master. Files are here : http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/ICCPROFILES/CameraProfiles/ Also, you can use the ICC profiles from BibbePro software. Look here : http://slave.paranoidbsd.org/photo/bibble.tgz Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by F.J.Cruz
Le Jeudi 31 Août 2006 23:15, F.J.Cruz a écrit :
> El Jueves, 31 de Agosto de 2006 23:00, Heiner Lamprecht escribió: > > On Thursday 31 August 2006 22:44, F.J.Cruz wrote: > > > El Jueves, 31 de Agosto de 2006 22:10, Mathusael escribió: > > > > I think that I get almost all my answers in previous post, but > > > > "color profile input" are still puzzling me... I am using a > > > > Minolta 7D for my shooting and I ask the camera to work/tag in > > > > AdobeRGB mode. However their is no way I can convince Digikam > > > > to use AdobeRGB as an input mode in the Digikam > > > > "Configuration/Configure/ColorManagement" menu. It seems to > > > > wait for a camera specific icm profile. > > > > > > You can't select AdobeRGB profile as input color profile because > > > it isn't an input device class profile: it's a display device > > > class one. > > > > But then, why can I configure my camera to save files in AdobeRGB? > > If I open such a file, digikam also tells me, that it is AdobeRGB > > embedded. > > > > > > > > Heiner > > There are 2 options: > > - Your camera is doing the conversion from and unknown profile to adobeRGB > and is embedding this one into the image. In my Dynax 5D all JPEG file taken using AdobeRGB color space use the .JPE file extension. > - Your camera isn't doing the conversion, but it's embedding such icc > profile. and 3rd possiblilty : the camera use the exif.image.colorspace tag to set the right color space use to transform the image : 0 = undefined, 1 = sRGB, 2 = AdobeRgb, 0 = undefined, 65535 = uncalibrated. Look here : http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html ...and search colorspace tag. digiKam parse this tag value when image is loaded in editor and embedded automaticly the right icc color space profile. > > In my modest opinnion, if you are working with RAW images, then there is no > conversion and the profiles is embedding only. Some cameras do it, but this is have a non-sence with a RAW file : this one must be transformed in a computer after downloading. There is no color trnasformation performed by camera. Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Vilars
Le Jeudi 31 Août 2006 22:10, Mathusael a écrit :
> Hi all, > > I have started playing with the color management model of Digikam 0.9. > As I have recently switch to raw data picture, I'm also quite pleased > with the tons of new features for that too... so a great thanks to the > Digikam team! > > I think that I get almost all my answers in previous post, but "color > profile input" are still puzzling me... I am using a Minolta 7D for my > shooting and I ask the camera to work/tag in AdobeRGB mode. However > their is no way I can convince Digikam to use AdobeRGB as an input mode > in the Digikam "Configuration/Configure/ColorManagement" menu. It seems > to wait for a camera specific icm profile. > > So what I do is I open the raw file, wait for the color management box > to appear, manually select the input to be AdobeRGB... and that's all... > however, I'm not sure I have the good workflow here ;-) > > Besides, when I select sRGB input profile, the result is plain ugly: > gamma is false, color awful... > > Besides I've read from Gilles Caullier in earlier post that you were > using Minolta 5D profile(??). Is this something you build specifically > (shooting a patch of colors and such?)? Something you downloaded from > Minolta? (Where?) IF you have a Dynax 5d, can you give me the Lens that you use ? I very interressed to improve the Exiv2 lens detection with Minolta makernote implementation. take a picture with a lens and scan the jpeg file taken using Exiv2 command line tool like this: exiv2 -pt MINOLTA-DYNAX5D.JPG | grep LensID if you have a number instead a string description of the lens, please give me some details about the lens. I will add this one into Exiv2 library. Note: Exiv2 is used by digiKAm to manage Exif/makernote/iptc metadata from pictures. Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-2
> and 3rd possiblilty : the camera use the exif.image.colorspace tag to set
oups, not exif.image.colorspace tag, but exif.photograph.colorspace (:=))) Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-2
>> Besides I've read from Gilles Caullier in earlier post that you were >> using Minolta 5D profile(??). Is this something you build specifically >> (shooting a patch of colors and such?)? Something you downloaded from >> Minolta? (Where?) >> > > IF you have a Dynax 5d, can you give me the Lens that you use ? I very > interressed to improve the Exiv2 lens detection with Minolta makernote > implementation. > My lenses are : - Minolta 28-70/2.8 - Sigma 100-300/4 EX Still interested though? > take a picture with a lens and scan the jpeg file taken using Exiv2 command > line tool like this: > > exiv2 -pt MINOLTA-DYNAX5D.JPG | grep LensID > > if you have a number instead a string description of the lens, please give me > some details about the lens. I will add this one into Exiv2 library. > I can do this on Sunday. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-2
Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Le Jeudi 31 Août 2006 22:10, Mathusael a écrit : > >> Besides I've read from Gilles Caullier in earlier post that you were >> using Minolta 5D profile(??). Is this something you build specifically >> (shooting a patch of colors and such?)? Something you downloaded from >> Minolta? (Where?) >> > > No i'm using Minolta ICC camera profile from DImage Master. Files are here : > > http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/ICCPROFILES/CameraProfiles/ > > Also, you can use the ICC profiles from BibbePro software. Look here : > > http://slave.paranoidbsd.org/photo/bibble.tgz Thanks, for the ICC profiles. I didn't mention it but I tried the one from bibble but the minolta1 & 2 didn't gave me any good results. As I don't know exactly for which camera they are made exactly... However the ones on the first link looks good, I will try them tonight. The odd thing is that I have DImage Master running on my box (wine), but when I checked the installation folders, there was no profiles... Googling around didn't gave me any good information. So thank you! _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by F.J.Cruz
F.J.Cruz wrote:
> El Jueves, 31 de Agosto de 2006 22:10, Mathusael escribió: > >> I think that I get almost all my answers in previous post, but "color >> profile input" are still puzzling me... I am using a Minolta 7D for my >> shooting and I ask the camera to work/tag in AdobeRGB mode. However >> their is no way I can convince Digikam to use AdobeRGB as an input mode >> in the Digikam "Configuration/Configure/ColorManagement" menu. It seems >> to wait for a camera specific icm profile. >> >> > > You can't select AdobeRGB profile as input color profile because it isn't an > input device class profile: it's a display device class one. > >> So what I do is I open the raw file, wait for the color management box >> to appear, manually select the input to be AdobeRGB... and that's all... >> however, I'm not sure I have the good workflow here ;-) >> Given what has been said above, I shouldn't be able to do such a thing, should I? _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-2
Gilles Caulier wrote:
> and 3rd possiblilty : the camera use the exif.image.colorspace tag to set the > right color space use to transform the image : 0 = undefined, 1 = sRGB, 2 = > AdobeRgb, 0 = undefined, 65535 = uncalibrated. Look here : > > http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html > > ...and search colorspace tag. digiKam parse this tag value when image is > loaded in editor and embedded automaticly the right icc color space profile. > > >> In my modest opinnion, if you are working with RAW images, then there is no >> conversion and the profiles is embedding only. >> > > Some cameras do it, but this is have a non-sence with a RAW file : this one > must be transformed in a computer after downloading. There is no color > trnasformation performed by camera. > sRGB as the default (at least this seems to be the case when I look at the color space properties of my RAW pictures) despite exif saying that the color space is AdobeRGB? _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Vilars
Le Vendredi 1 Septembre 2006 09:32, Nicolas Vilars a écrit :
> >> Besides I've read from Gilles Caullier in earlier post that you were > >> using Minolta 5D profile(??). Is this something you build specifically > >> (shooting a patch of colors and such?)? Something you downloaded from > >> Minolta? (Where?) > > > > IF you have a Dynax 5d, can you give me the Lens that you use ? I very > > interressed to improve the Exiv2 lens detection with Minolta makernote > > implementation. > > no luck, I'm using a 7D. > My lenses are : > - Minolta 28-70/2.8 > - Sigma 100-300/4 EX > > Still interested though? Yes, of course : Minolta makernote from 7D and 5D are around the same. about the LensId tag, it's the same. Look recently the new Sony Alpha 100 use also the Dynax 5D makernote. (normal since Sony have buy all Minolta digital camera business) > > > take a picture with a lens and scan the jpeg file taken using Exiv2 > > command line tool like this: > > > > exiv2 -pt MINOLTA-DYNAX5D.JPG | grep LensID > > > > if you have a number instead a string description of the lens, please > > give me some details about the lens. I will add this one into Exiv2 > > library. > > I can do this on Sunday. ok thanks. The Lens table already implemented is listed below : //! Lookup table to translate Minolta Lens id values to readable labels extern const TagDetails minoltaLensID[] = { { 1, "AF80-200mm F2.8G" }, { 2, "AF28-70mm F2.8G" }, { 6, "AF24-85mm F3.5-4.5" }, { 7, "AF100-400mm F4.5-6.7 (D)" }, { 8, "AF70-210mm F4.5-5.6" }, { 11, "AF300mm F4G" }, { 12, "AF100mm F2.8 Soft" }, { 15, "AF400mm F4.5G" }, { 16, "AF17-35mm F3.5G" }, { 19, "AF35mm/1.4" }, { 20, "STF135mm F2.8 [T4.5]" }, { 23, "AF200mm F4G Macro" }, { 24, "AF24-105mm F3.5-4.5(D) or SIGMA 18-50mm F2.8 or Sigma DC 18-125mm F4-5,6 D" }, { 25, "AF100-300mm F4.5-5.6 (D)" }, { 27, "AF85mm F1.4G" }, { 28, "AF100mm F2.8 Macro(D)" }, { 29, "AF75-300mm F4.5-5.6 (D)" }, { 30, "AF28-80mm F3.5-5.6 (D)" }, { 31, "AF50mm F2.8 Macro(D) or AF50mm F3.5 Macro" }, { 32, "AF100-400mm F4.5-6.7(D) x1.5" }, { 33, "AF70-200mm F2.8G SSM" }, { 35, "AF85mm F1.4G(D) Limited" }, { 38, "AF17-35mm F2.8-4 (D)" }, { 39, "AF28-75mm F2.8 (D)" }, { 40, "AFDT18-70mm F3.5-5.6 (D)" }, { 41, "TAMRON Di II LD 11-18mm F4-5.6" }, { 128, "TAMRON 18-200, 28-300 or 80-300mm F3.5-6.3" }, { 25501, "AF50mm F1.7" }, { 25521, "TOKINA 19-35mm F3.5-4.5 or TOKINA 28-70mm F2.8 AT-X" }, { 25541, "AF35-105mm F3.5-4.5" }, { 25551, "AF70-210mm F4 Macro or SIGMA 70-210mm F4-5.6 APO" }, { 25581, "AF24-50mm F4" }, { 25611, "SIGMA 70-300mm F4-5.6 or SIGMA 300mm F4 APO Macro" }, { 25621, "AF50mm F1.4 NEW" }, { 25631, "AF300mm F2.8G" }, { 25641, "AF50mm F2.8 Macro" }, { 25661, "AF24mm F2.8" }, { 25721, "AF500mm F8 Reflex" }, { 25781, "AF16mm F2.8 Fisheye or SIGMA 8mm F4 Fisheye" }, { 25791, "AF20mm F2.8" }, { 25811, "AF100mm F2.8 Macro(D) or TAMRON 90mm F2.8 Macro or SIGMA 180mm F5.6 Macro" }, { 25858, "TAMRON 24-135mm F3.5-5.6" }, { 25891, "TOKINA 80-200mm F2.8" }, { 25921, "AF85mm F1.4G(D)" }, { 25931, "AF200mm F2.8G" }, { 25961, "AF28mm F2" }, { 25981, "AF100mm F2" }, { 26061, "AF100-300mm F4.5-5.6(D) or SIGMA 105mm F2.8 Macro EX-DG" }, { 26081, "AF300mm F2.8G" }, { 26121, "AF200mm F2.8G(D)" }, { 26131, "AF50mm F1.7" }, { 26151, "AF28-105mm F3.5-4.5 Xi" }, { 26241, "AF35-80mm F4-5.6" }, { 45741, "AF200mm F2.8G x2 or TOKINA 300mm F2.8 x2" } }; Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by F.J.Cruz
On Thursday 31 August 2006 23:15, F.J.Cruz wrote:
> > There are 2 options: > > - Your camera is doing the conversion from and unknown profile to > adobeRGB and is embedding this one into the image. > > - Your camera isn't doing the conversion, but it's embedding such > icc profile. > > In my modest opinnion, if you are working with RAW images, then > there is no conversion and the profiles is embedding only. Right. But I don't work with RAW, as my camera is terribly slow in saving RAW images. Therefore I normally take JPGs. As far as I can see, the camera does the conversion. Otherwise I would assume, to see more difference when opening the image with other non-CMS programs, right? What does digikam, when opening an image with a profile embedded? Is this profile used? Heiner -- heiner at heiner-lamprecht dot net GnuPG - Key: 9859E373 Fingerprint: 3770 7947 F917 94EF 8717 BADB 0139 7554 9859 E373 _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-2
On Friday 01 September 2006 06:54, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> IF you have a Dynax 5d, can you give me the Lens that you use ? I very > interressed to improve the Exiv2 lens detection with Minolta makernote > implementation. There are one or two in exiftool that haven't been ported yet, as well: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/Minolta.html If you find out about any more, it would be nice to patch exiftool at the same time, as it is my major source of information for exiv2 so I take a lot from there :) David _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by Heiner Lamprecht
Le Vendredi 1 Septembre 2006 10:45, Heiner Lamprecht a écrit :
> On Thursday 31 August 2006 23:15, F.J.Cruz wrote: > > There are 2 options: > > > > - Your camera is doing the conversion from and unknown profile to > > adobeRGB and is embedding this one into the image. > > > > - Your camera isn't doing the conversion, but it's embedding such > > icc profile. > > > > In my modest opinnion, if you are working with RAW images, then > > there is no conversion and the profiles is embedding only. > > Right. But I don't work with RAW, as my camera is terribly slow in > saving RAW images. Therefore I normally take JPGs. As far as I > can see, the camera does the conversion. Otherwise I would assume, > to see more difference when opening the image with other non-CMS > programs, right? > > What does digikam, when opening an image with a profile embedded? > Is this profile used? > digiKam check if this embedded profile is the same than default profile set in ICC configuration. If no, digiKam ask to user about to use the default profile instead the embeded, else emdeded profile is used. Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
In reply to this post by David Cannings
Le Vendredi 1 Septembre 2006 10:50, David a écrit :
> On Friday 01 September 2006 06:54, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > IF you have a Dynax 5d, can you give me the Lens that you use ? I very > > interressed to improve the Exiv2 lens detection with Minolta makernote > > implementation. > > There are one or two in exiftool that haven't been ported yet, as well: > > http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/Minolta.html > > If you find out about any more, it would be nice to patch exiftool at the > same time, as it is my major source of information for exiv2 so I take a > lot from there :) > Well, i'm an Exiv2 developper, not ExifTool (:=))) Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
On Friday 01 September 2006 10:00, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Le Vendredi 1 Septembre 2006 10:50, David a écrit : > > On Friday 01 September 2006 06:54, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > IF you have a Dynax 5d, can you give me the Lens that you use ? I very > > > interressed to improve the Exiv2 lens detection with Minolta makernote > > > implementation. > > > > There are one or two in exiftool that haven't been ported yet, as well: > > > > http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/Minolta.html > > > > If you find out about any more, it would be nice to patch exiftool at the > > same time, as it is my major source of information for exiv2 so I take a > > lot from there :) > > Well, i'm an Exiv2 developper, not ExifTool (:=))) So at least notify Phil of what you found. We can't just take information from exiftool and not give anything back (where possible). That's hardly fair. David _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: color profile input: a question
|
|
Le Vendredi 1 Septembre 2006 11:53, David a écrit :
> On Friday 01 September 2006 10:00, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > Le Vendredi 1 Septembre 2006 10:50, David a écrit : > > > On Friday 01 September 2006 06:54, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > IF you have a Dynax 5d, can you give me the Lens that you use ? I > > > > very interressed to improve the Exiv2 lens detection with Minolta > > > > makernote implementation. > > > > > > There are one or two in exiftool that haven't been ported yet, as well: > > > > > > http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/Minolta.html > > > > > > If you find out about any more, it would be nice to patch exiftool at > > > the same time, as it is my major source of information for exiv2 so I > > > take a lot from there :) > > > > Well, i'm an Exiv2 developper, not ExifTool (:=))) > > So at least notify Phil of what you found. We can't just take information > from exiftool and not give anything back (where possible). That's hardly > fair. > no, because it's just a question of time and priority. But you can do it if you want. Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |