When I came back to digikam a few months ago, I was overjoyed to find
how much easier it was to tag images. I'm quite a keyboard-oriented person, and I found that the ability to tag via the "new tag" box was great. The behaviour used to be this: "start typing a tag" if the string typed matched an existing one, it would offer to complete the tag. If not, a new tag was created, *and applied*. This made tagging very quick and easy. I could start typing existing tags, hit enter, hit comma, start again and it would quickly create new tags and tag the image. Now, the behaviour has changed. The "new tag" box only creates the tag, it doesn't select its checkbox. This means I have to create a new tag, and then go find it to select it. It also doesn't auto-complete the existing tags. I'm gutted that this has changed, as it's a big enough issue that I'll be looking at alternative tagging mechanisms. The older behaviour was the best I've used in any app. I haven't been able to find a mention in the changelog that explains the change. Anybody else notice this? Joe _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Joe Wrigley wrote:
> When I came back to digikam a few months ago, I was overjoyed to find > how much easier it was to tag images. I'm quite a keyboard-oriented > person, and I found that the ability to tag via the "new tag" box was > great. > > The behaviour used to be this: > > "start typing a tag" if the string typed matched an existing one, it > would offer to complete the tag. If not, a new tag was created, *and > applied*. This made tagging very quick and easy. I could start typing > existing tags, hit enter, hit comma, start again and it would quickly > create new tags and tag the image. > > Now, the behaviour has changed. The "new tag" box only creates the > tag, it doesn't select its checkbox. This means I have to create a new > tag, and then go find it to select it. It also doesn't auto-complete > the existing tags. > > I'm gutted that this has changed, as it's a big enough issue that I'll > be looking at alternative tagging mechanisms. The older behaviour was > the best I've used in any app. > > I haven't been able to find a mention in the changelog that explains > the change. Anybody else notice this? Johannes _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users signature.asc (260 bytes) Download Attachment |
>> I haven't been able to find a mention in the changelog that explains
>> the change. Anybody else notice this? > > This was fixed in trunk and will be available in the next version. Woo! Now I can stop cursing how crap f-spot, shotwell et al are :-) Thanks for the quick response. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On 3 August 2010 12:52, Joe Wrigley <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> I haven't been able to find a mention in the changelog that explains >>> the change. Anybody else notice this? >> >> This was fixed in trunk and will be available in the next version. Quick followup, I built digikam from svn trunk and can confirm the old behaviour is back. I'm happy today :-) _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |