Hi All,
I made a lot of researches on the mailing list and the web in order to find which settings have been applied to my imported raw images with digikam (version 2.5.0 under ubuntu 12.04 LTS), but without success. When I edit the image and apply the default settings (left untouched in the configuration), I got a worse result from what I see in the preview window of digikam (which is quite very good). I wanted to precise that the camera does not embed a jpeg equivalent, so even if the preview is named "Embedded JPEG preview", I could guess that digikam applied a post-processing on the imported raw. I tried also different noise reduction algorithms and luminosity corrections, but I cannot reach the same result as seen in preview window. Any help would be very appreciated on how to reach the same result applied by digikam Christophe _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Default settings are listed in digiKAm RAW decoding config panel.
Gilles Caulier 2014-03-05 15:53 GMT+01:00 Christophe Bourez <[hidden email]>: > Hi All, > > I made a lot of researches on the mailing list and the web in order to find > which settings have been applied to my imported raw images with digikam > (version 2.5.0 under ubuntu 12.04 LTS), but without success. > When I edit the image and apply the default settings (left untouched in the > configuration), I got a worse result from what I see in the preview window > of digikam (which is quite very good). I wanted to precise that the camera > does not embed a jpeg equivalent, so even if the preview is named "Embedded > JPEG preview", I could guess that digikam applied a post-processing on the > imported raw. > I tried also different noise reduction algorithms and luminosity > corrections, but I cannot reach the same result as seen in preview window. > > Any help would be very appreciated on how to reach the same result applied > by digikam > > Christophe > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Hi Gilles,
When I open the raw image with the image editor (Settings > Configure digiKam ... > RAW Decoding > Behaviour set on "Always open the Raw Import Tool to customise settings") and if I press "Use Default" (as mentioned at the end of this page: http://userbase.kde.org/Digikam/Process_RAW_Files), I do not get the same result as the "preview" done by the main window of the application. By using the default settings during the edition, the result provided by the image editor is noisier and the brightness is not as good as in the "preview". This lets me think that the set of post processing operations performed during the "preview" is different from the set of operations performed by the raw image editor using the default settings. FYI, I never changed the default settings in the Raw decoding config panel (Demosaicing Quality = Bilinear, White Balance/Method = Camera and Auto Brightness is checked, Corrections/Noise reduction = None). -- Christophe On 08/03/14 18:37, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Default settings are listed in digiKAm RAW decoding config panel. > > Gilles Caulier > > 2014-03-05 15:53 GMT+01:00 Christophe Bourez <[hidden email]>: >> Hi All, >> >> I made a lot of researches on the mailing list and the web in order to find >> which settings have been applied to my imported raw images with digikam >> (version 2.5.0 under ubuntu 12.04 LTS), but without success. >> When I edit the image and apply the default settings (left untouched in the >> configuration), I got a worse result from what I see in the preview window >> of digikam (which is quite very good). I wanted to precise that the camera >> does not embed a jpeg equivalent, so even if the preview is named "Embedded >> JPEG preview", I could guess that digikam applied a post-processing on the >> imported raw. >> I tried also different noise reduction algorithms and luminosity >> corrections, but I cannot reach the same result as seen in preview window. >> >> Any help would be very appreciated on how to reach the same result applied >> by digikam >> >> Christophe >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |