Two important things Digikam misses (IMHO)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Two important things Digikam misses (IMHO)

mahikeulbody
I follow Digikam since many years. It is a fantastic software now ! But it misses two important things (at least to me) which don't let me use it yet : - the ability to edit metadata of several photos simply. Registered forms is useful for some repetitive schemes but it is to complicated/unusable for metadata related to only a few photos. A good exemple of an efficient ergonomy is FastPhotoTagger. - the ability to do search for any xmp metadata (such as City or Location as an exemple). Some software (windows only) let you choice the subset of metadata to put in DB when creating it. (sorry for my bad english, I am french)

Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Two important things Digikam misses (IMHO)

Tristán G. Trecu
I have the same problem.
I have been using digiKam for some time now and it is fantastic. Now I am
trying to use Darwin Core but I can't find the way. If I add tags using
exiftool, I can see them on digiKam but I can't search for photos that have
a tag or more from Darwin Core.
Is it possible to search for xmp.dwc tags?



--
Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Two important things Digikam misses (IMHO)

woenx
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Two important things Digikam misses (IMHO)

Rafael Linux
I talked about modifying metadata INSIDE XMP sidecar files for a set of
selected RAW or any other format (I repeat, IN the XMP files) in a way
simplier than the actual way, that is not working, here:
http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digiKam-users-Metadata-for-RAW-files-td4708701.html#a4708837
and here
http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digiKam-users-Update-metadata-for-multiple-photographs-td4708829.html#a4708832

so I agree with this should be something to improve IMHO

Thank you



--
Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Two important things Digikam misses (IMHO)

woenx
Rafael, at the end you didn't manage to be able to edit the XMP sidecars for
RAW files?



--
Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Two important things Digikam misses (IMHO)

Rafael Linux
It never worked so I desisted. The most intuitive and easy way:
- Select a RAW file
- Ctrl + Shift + M
- Select "Edit XMP"
- Enable "Copyright" and change the text for any other text
- Click "Accept"
- Repeat all steps, you will notice the Copyright was not changed.

If fact, if this method (if it could work) will not change all files in an
quick way, cause it forces user to click on "Next" , change the text user
want to modify and click on "Apply" button again. Maybe the batch mode work
(I didn't try again) but this should work too for individual photos, and is
not working  :(  (at least, for me) on RW2 files.



--
Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Two important things Digikam misses (IMHO)

PackElend
Hi there,

has been a while since my last contribution.

My impression is, that there are a numerous discussion and feature
request talking around the not-so-ideal user-friendliness in regard of
bulk metadata editing. That leads to the situation that user either
switch to other software for this purpose or ignore digiKam completely.
I expect that KDE will apply again at Google Summer of Code next year,
so that could be an ideal project. It was mentioned that that has to be
included to digiKam via a plug-in but plug-in architecture was
simplified in v6.x so chances are higher than in the past to have this
done successfully.
There is one aspect what has to be taken account. Changes on the user
interface are not easy to coordinate, as there isn't any mock-up of the
UI of digiKam so you either use screenshot and mark the changes, create
GIFs or may do screen sharing. All of them are quite time consuming, so
the process of such a project can be quite sluggish.  I reckon woenx
agrees with me.
As there are alternative software proposal in the mailing list and bug
tracker it could simplify this exchange of information. You can clearly
define what functionality shell be provided and describe the workflow in
simply words by telling I want to do it as in app xy :).
That could help a lot to make this project a quick start, couldn't it?

FastPhotoTagger seems to be quite active in contrast to EasyTAG and acts
just as graphical wrapper around the ExifTool. I'm sure digiKam could
the same in regard of metadata changes. Unfortunately FastPhotoTagger is
written in Java but digiKam in C++ you cannot copy&paste but Java has a
strong influence of C++, so whoever going to write the code, she or he
should be able to read the source code.

At the end it is up to the maintainer on what priority this project
would get but anyone can propose a project and describe the scope.

Stefan




Am 08.11.2019 um 01:21 schrieb Rafael Linux:

> It never worked so I desisted. The most intuitive and easy way:
> - Select a RAW file
> - Ctrl + Shift + M
> - Select "Edit XMP"
> - Enable "Copyright" and change the text for any other text
> - Click "Accept"
> - Repeat all steps, you will notice the Copyright was not changed.
>
> If fact, if this method (if it could work) will not change all files in an
> quick way, cause it forces user to click on "Next" , change the text user
> want to modify and click on "Apply" button again. Maybe the batch mode work
> (I didn't try again) but this should work too for individual photos, and is
> not working  :(  (at least, for me) on RW2 files.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html