Taking the plunge: Digikam 2. Are my photos safe?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Taking the plunge: Digikam 2. Are my photos safe?

Dotan Cohen
I'm willing to risk the loss of my Digikam database, but not my photos
themselves. Is it safe, then, to start testing Digikam 2 beta 2?

--
Dotan Cohen

http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Taking the plunge: Digikam 2. Are my photos safe?

Milan Knížek
Dotan Cohen píše v Út 22. 02. 2011 v 18:37 +0200:
> I'm willing to risk the loss of my Digikam database, but not my photos
> themselves. Is it safe, then, to start testing Digikam 2 beta 2?
>
Data on computer is never safe, only safer and less safe, the latter
more probable with beta versions.

Never backed up your photos? Get ready for losing them one day anyway...

P.S. I am using the git version and things work - for me.

regards,
Milan
--
http://www.milan-knizek.net/

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Taking the plunge: Digikam 2. Are my photos safe?

Gilles Caulier-4
In reply to this post by Dotan Cohen
I think it's safe.

Where code is in beta :

1/ versioning,
2/ XMP sidecar
3/ face detection
4/ reverse gecoding.
5/ tags keyboard shortcuts
6/ color labels
7/ pick labels

The most sensible part is versioning. But you can drop it in your
workflow and test it as well with test images.

All others parts do not touch to image data.

Note : 5/6/7 will appears in beta 3, in 1 week. I currently finalize
implementation.

Gilles Caulier

2011/2/22 Dotan Cohen <[hidden email]>:

> I'm willing to risk the loss of my Digikam database, but not my photos
> themselves. Is it safe, then, to start testing Digikam 2 beta 2?
>
> --
> Dotan Cohen
>
> http://gibberish.co.il
> http://what-is-what.com
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Taking the plunge: Digikam 2. Are my photos safe?

Dotan Cohen
In reply to this post by Milan Knížek
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 19:23, Milan Knížek <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Data on computer is never safe, only safer and less safe, the latter
> more probable with beta versions.
>
> Never backed up your photos? Get ready for losing them one day anyway...
>
> P.S. I am using the git version and things work - for me.
>

Thanks, Milan. I backup the photos monthly. I cannot back them up more
often than that. Furthermore, Digikam is my interface to bringing the
photos into the computer from the camera.

Thanks, though!


--
Dotan Cohen

http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Taking the plunge: Digikam 2. Are my photos safe?

Dotan Cohen
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 19:45, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I think it's safe.
>
> Where code is in beta :
>
> 1/ versioning,
> 2/ XMP sidecar
> 3/ face detection
> 4/ reverse gecoding.
> 5/ tags keyboard shortcuts
> 6/ color labels
> 7/ pick labels
>
> The most sensible part is versioning. But you can drop it in your
> workflow and test it as well with test images.
>
> All others parts do not touch to image data.
>
> Note : 5/6/7 will appears in beta 3, in 1 week. I currently finalize
> implementation.
>

Thanks, Gilles. I am actually very interested in versioning, so I will
only test that feature on disposable photos. I will wait 1 week for
the beta 3. I hope that someone saves me some trouble and packages a
Kubuntu .deb! Digikam is _hard_ to compile!


--
Dotan Cohen

http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Taking the plunge: Digikam 2. Are my photos safe?

J Albrecht


On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 23:42 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: I will wait 1 week for
the beta 3. I hope that someone saves me some trouble and packages a
Kubuntu .deb! Digikam is _hard_ to compile!



If anybody is counting how many people feel the same way as Dotan does, you can add me to the tally...  :-)
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Taking the plunge: Digikam 2. Are my photos safe?

ozzyprv
Add me too! ;-)

Where can I find the instructions of "how to install the latest (beta) version of DK in your computer"?

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Hevï Guy <[hidden email]> wrote:


On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 23:42 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: I will wait 1 week for
the beta 3. I hope that someone saves me some trouble and packages a
Kubuntu .deb! Digikam is _hard_ to compile!



If anybody is counting how many people feel the same way as Dotan does, you can add me to the tally...  :-)

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users



_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users