Hi,
I allways view my images in albums sorted by timestamp. Yesterday I took quite a lot of images during a foball game. Some of the images are in series, and they have the same timestamp. Now in Digikam the sorting of these images with same timestamp is chaotic, one can say. I have never thought of this before, but it was obvoius now when a sequence of running people are out of order. I could choose to view the images sorted by name in this case, but sometimes I have images from different cameras in the same album. Hence the images might have different namimg conventions, and the images are not in timely order which I like to have. Is it possible to sort by timestamp and then by image name, if same timestamp? Might be a feature request? Using Digikam 1.2.0 with KDE 4.3.5, in openSUSE 11.2. /Anders _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Am 23.05.2010 19:06 schrieb Stedtlund:
> I allways view my images in albums sorted by timestamp. Yesterday I > took quite a lot of images during a foball game. Some of the images > are in series, and they have the same timestamp. Now in Digikam the > sorting of these images with same timestamp is chaotic, one can say. I > have never thought of this before, but it was obvoius now when a > sequence of running people are out of order. > > I could choose to view the images sorted by name in this case, but > sometimes I have images from different cameras in the same album. > Hence the images might have different namimg conventions, and the > images are not in timely order which I like to have. > > Is it possible to sort by timestamp and then by image name, if same > timestamp? Might be a feature request? with pattern timestamp_originalname.ext. Johannes _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users signature.asc (270 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Anders Stedtlund
> > I allways view my images in albums sorted by timestamp. Yesterday I > took quite a lot of images during a foball game. Some of the images > are in series, and they have the same timestamp. Now in Digikam the > sorting of these images with same timestamp is chaotic, one can say. I > have never thought of this before, but it was obvoius now when a > sequence of running people are out of order. > > I could choose to view the images sorted by name in this case, but > sometimes I have images from different cameras in the same album. > Hence the images might have different namimg conventions, and the > images are not in timely order which I like to have. > > Is it possible to sort by timestamp and then by image name, if same > timestamp? Might be a feature request? Yes you are right, looking at the code, the sorting of images with identical timestamp is undefined. We can fix this. Marcel _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
> > I allways view my images in albums sorted by timestamp. Yesterday I > > took quite a lot of images during a foball game. Some of the images > > are in series, and they have the same timestamp. Now in Digikam the > > sorting of these images with same timestamp is chaotic, one can say. I > > have never thought of this before, but it was obvoius now when a > > sequence of running people are out of order. > > > > I could choose to view the images sorted by name in this case, but > > sometimes I have images from different cameras in the same album. > > Hence the images might have different namimg conventions, and the > > images are not in timely order which I like to have. > > > > Is it possible to sort by timestamp and then by image name, if same > > timestamp? Might be a feature request? > > Yes you are right, looking at the code, the sorting of images with > identical timestamp is undefined. We can fix this. Done in SVN. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Great!
/Anders 2010/5/23 Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]>: > >> > I allways view my images in albums sorted by timestamp. Yesterday I >> > took quite a lot of images during a foball game. Some of the images >> > are in series, and they have the same timestamp. Now in Digikam the >> > sorting of these images with same timestamp is chaotic, one can say. I >> > have never thought of this before, but it was obvoius now when a >> > sequence of running people are out of order. >> > >> > I could choose to view the images sorted by name in this case, but >> > sometimes I have images from different cameras in the same album. >> > Hence the images might have different namimg conventions, and the >> > images are not in timely order which I like to have. >> > >> > Is it possible to sort by timestamp and then by image name, if same >> > timestamp? Might be a feature request? >> >> Yes you are right, looking at the code, the sorting of images with >> identical timestamp is undefined. We can fix this. > > Done in SVN. > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Marcel Wiesweg
Am Sonntag, 23. Mai 2010 schrieb Marcel Wiesweg:
> > > I allways view my images in albums sorted by timestamp. > > > Yesterday I took quite a lot of images during a foball game. > > > Some of the images are in series, and they have the same > > > timestamp. Now in Digikam the sorting of these images with > > > same timestamp is chaotic, one can say. I have never thought > > > of this before, but it was obvoius now when a sequence of > > > running people are out of order. > > > > > > I could choose to view the images sorted by name in this case, > > > but sometimes I have images from different cameras in the same > > > album. Hence the images might have different namimg > > > conventions, and the images are not in timely order which I > > > like to have. > > > > > > Is it possible to sort by timestamp and then by image name, if > > > same timestamp? Might be a feature request? > > > > Yes you are right, looking at the code, the sorting of images > > with identical timestamp is undefined. We can fix this. > > Done in SVN. Does this affect sorting of raw and jpeg as well? I mostly store jpeg and raw side by side in the same folder. Sometimes raw pics are the first to show, sometimes jpeg (but may be I have not found the settings for this). Martin _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
> > > Yes you are right, looking at the code, the sorting of images > > > with identical timestamp is undefined. We can fix this. > > > > Done in SVN. > > Does this affect sorting of raw and jpeg as well? I mostly store jpeg > and raw side by side in the same folder. Sometimes raw pics are the > first to show, sometimes jpeg (but may be I have not found the > settings for this). In case you sort by creation date, the next sorting will be done by filename. That means the RAW / JPEG order should be defined. Note: with the Nondestructive Editing GSoC project we intend to bring grouping to RAW/JPEG pairs. More on this towards the end of this year... _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |