|
Hi everyone,
I'm porting digiKam web services with library O2, qt library for OAuth. Working on Smugmug, I'm stuck with an error that I didn't understand. Smugmug uses OAuth 1.0 as authentication method, like Flickr, so I used same methods to login, get user data, post photos, etc. In fact, I can login and get access token using O2 methods. I also verified that the token I got is the right one. However, whenever I tried to use that token to get/post something, QNetworkReply returns with error 204 (AuthenticationRequiredError) and error message : "Host authentication required". Besides, Smugmug has endpoints that don't require token to access (e.g GET /api/v2/user/<nickname>). So when I tried normal GET method of QNetworkManager it worked, but when I used specific method for GET in O2 (which prepares token and other necessary headers in the url request), that error appeared, Did anyone see this message error when working with authentication before? I really appreciate any help and guide, since I am really stuck here. Thanks, Thanh-Trung Dinh -- Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-devel-f1695701.html |
|
Hi Than, I'm currently very busy to complete evening classes in school, so i cannot check your code for the next few days. I will be more available at next week end. I will checkout your branch and test your code. Best Gilles 2018-06-02 23:49 GMT+02:00 Thanh Trung Dinh <[hidden email]>: Hi everyone, |
|
In reply to this post by Thanh Trung Dinh
Hi Thanh,
Look smugwindow.cpp: 232 the nickName is always empty. Therefore your login function will never be executed. I think login with nickname does not exist anymore, so the dialog for entering email and password can be removed as well. The LINK to Smugmug then works through the website, but the return Json code has changed. Maik Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2018, 23:49:42 CEST schrieb Thanh Trung Dinh: > Hi everyone, > > I'm porting digiKam web services with library O2, qt library for OAuth. > Working on Smugmug, I'm stuck with an error that I didn't understand. > > Smugmug uses OAuth 1.0 as authentication method, like Flickr, so I used same > methods to login, get user data, post photos, etc. In fact, I can login and > get access token using O2 methods. I also verified that the token I got is > the right one. However, whenever I tried to use that token to get/post > something, QNetworkReply returns with error 204 > (AuthenticationRequiredError) and error message : "Host authentication > required". Besides, Smugmug has endpoints that don't require token to access > (e.g GET /api/v2/user/<nickname>). So when I tried normal GET method of > QNetworkManager it worked, but when I used specific method for GET in O2 > (which prepares token and other necessary headers in the url request), that > error appeared, > > Did anyone see this message error when working with authentication before? I > really appreciate any help and guide, since I am really stuck here. > > Thanks, > > Thanh-Trung Dinh > > > > -- > Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-devel-f1695701.html |
|
Hi Maik, In fact, I added those lines and nickName is not always empty. In core/tests/webservices/smugmug.cpp, I added a command line option for login with nickname. When you run standalone test for smugmug with --login <nickname>, the nickname will be propagated when the login page is opened, so that I can get the nickName from user. In fact, It came from my misunderstanding. At that time, I had succeeded with authentication, but when I tried to get current user info from endpoint /api/v2!authuser (reference here), I got the same error of "authentication required" that I mentioned above. I had misunderstood that there was problem with that endpoint, so in order to use other APIs, I had to have nickname (at least), so I added that command line option. However, later I found out that even with nickname, I still got the same error when I tried to POST something via APIs. I finally figured out that these endpoints (those I succeeded with GET) are public, so no need for access token, and the problem still remains with endpoints needing token (/api/v2!authuser is one of them). Therefore, it must be problem with including auth token to the request. I attache here a patch with my latest modifications so that you can test it. Thanh. On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Thanh, -- Mr. Thanh-Trung Dinh Université de Technologie de Compiègne (UTC) - France Tel: +33 7 53 68 20 29 |
|
Hi, I finally figured out why I got this error. I post on forum so that if anyone working with O2 and smugmug api later won't waste too much time. I found out that I had tried to create a request with some parameters, so I used O1::createRequestParameters to add those parameters to the request and sign it. However, I forgot to add the request to the url itself. According to a post I found on Smugmug forum, when a request cannot be parsed because of something relating to oauth, it will be returned with error "Authentication required", and that explains why I didn't get this error when trying to make a normal GET request (without any OAuth1 parameters) to a public endpoint. So, that's it - the root cause of this problem. Thanh. On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Thanh Trung Dinh <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- Mr. Thanh-Trung Dinh Université de Technologie de Compiègne (UTC) - France Tel: +33 7 53 68 20 29 |
|
Hi Thanh, We have the second student working on the manual icon-view sorting project who advance well and have completed a first stage of the project as the code is typically read for testing as beta by end users. We plan to release an official 6.0.0-beta1 version in a near future, with a back-port from the student development branch to master. The goal is to provide an official test version with a release announcement including new feature to test, and of course to catch user feedback quickly in goal to stabilize new implementations. What do you think about your project ? Some O2 implementations can be ready for a beta stage ? Of course, this will include to back-port current code from your branch to master. Best Gilles 2018-06-06 0:15 GMT+02:00 Thanh Trung Dinh <[hidden email]>:
|
|
Hi Gilles, Currently, I finished main functionalities of those needed to be ported to O2 for Smugmug and Google. For Facebook, I think that I have finished all. In fact, those new implementations worked with my tests. I still have to do the app review on Facebook, so that digiKam can be used out of developer mode. Besides, there are many things that I want to change on the interface for the next step, the factorization part, so I do thing that beta stage is really necessary. Now, I am finishing codes for Smugmug and Google. I plan to run the static analyzers this weekend to check my codes. So, is it possible that back-porting my branch to master is on Sunday afternoon, so that I will have enough time to accomplish my part? I really want to see user feedbacks for new O2 implementations. Thanh. On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- Mr. Thanh-Trung Dinh Université de Technologie de Compiègne (UTC) - France Tel: +33 7 53 68 20 29 |
|
Hi Gilles, So I have finished porting google and smugmug to O2. I have pushed to gsoc18-exporttools-o2 branch and I'm running statistic check now. For google photo, I noticed something strange :
Besides, I don't have account created on Picasa Web when it hadn't been into Google Photo, so all my test are with Google Photo. I don't know if there are any other bugs with repos like that. So, could you make some tests on my new codes to verify? I added a TODO list as you said, so that we can keep track of what I haven't done yet. Best, Thanh On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Thanh Trung Dinh <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- Mr. Thanh-Trung Dinh Université de Technologie de Compiègne (UTC) - France Tel: +33 7 53 68 20 29 |
|
Hi Thanh,
2018-06-10 11:03 GMT+02:00 Thanh Trung Dinh <[hidden email]>:
Yes sure verify if these entries still valid with your development branch.
Concerning PicasaWeb, i'm not sure if Picasa will be supported by Google in a near future. After all GPhoto is here, and the goal, logically, is to replace Picasa web service. I remember one year ago a talk with user on digikam-users mailing list about this topic where people coninue to use PicasaWeb because Gphoto was not yet finalized, or do not provide all the same feature. To be sure, the best is to ask to end users on the ML. Best Gilles |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
