Shouldn't batch rename imply Sync with Database?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Shouldn't batch rename imply Sync with Database?

Alec Bau
That's a question to developers I guess. I just found that after batch rename album continues to misleadingly show old file names. Refresh doesn't help. I poked around and found Album/Sync with Database which did the right thing. Shouldn't db be transparently synced after mass operations? Otherwise current behavior is rather confusing and counterintuitive.

Thanks,
     Alec

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Shouldn't batch rename imply Sync with Database?

Gilles Caulier-4
I never see this problem. Which digiKAm version (print there
Help/components Info dialog contents)

What do you see in the console ?

Gilles Caulier

2009/7/19 Alec Bau <[hidden email]>:

> That's a question to developers I guess. I just found that after batch
> rename album continues to misleadingly show old file names. Refresh doesn't
> help. I poked around and found Album/Sync with Database which did the right
> thing. Shouldn't db be transparently synced after mass operations? Otherwise
> current behavior is rather confusing and counterintuitive.
>
> Thanks,
>      Alec
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Shouldn't batch rename imply Sync with Database?

Alec Bau
Gilles,

My dK is 0.10.0. I'm running it under Mandriva 2009.1 and KDE 4.2.4. I just repeated mass rename starting dK from the console. Same result - I have to do explicit sync with db to get album view updated with new names. During rename stdout in console was repeating following:

Object::connect: No such signal KIO::PreviewJob::gotPreview(const KFileItem*, const QPixmap&)
Object::connect:  (receiver name: 'RenameImagesBase')

Hope this helps.

On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
I never see this problem. Which digiKAm version (print there
Help/components Info dialog contents)

What do you see in the console ?

Gilles Caulier

2009/7/19 Alec Bau <[hidden email]>:
> That's a question to developers I guess. I just found that after batch
> rename album continues to misleadingly show old file names. Refresh doesn't
> help. I poked around and found Album/Sync with Database which did the right
> thing. Shouldn't db be transparently synced after mass operations? Otherwise
> current behavior is rather confusing and counterintuitive.
>
> Thanks,
>      Alec
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users