Searches on read only library path

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Searches on read only library path

Domenico Salvagnin
Hello!

I have just upgraded from 0.7.4 to 0.8.0 and the progress has been really
impressive!

Anyway, I have a little problem. As explained in #114682, I need to use
digikam on a read only library path. In this scenario searches are quite
unusable, since it is not possible to add a search album.
I've developed a 4-line-patch that solves the problem, which allows the
creation of temporary search albums not stored in the db: what have I to do
to submit the patch to the developers (P.S: I've been working on a SVN
repository)?

Thanks

Domenico
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Searches on read only library path

Bugzilla from ach@mpe.mpg.de
On Monday 28 November 2005 14:10, Domenico Salvagnin wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I have just upgraded from 0.7.4 to 0.8.0 and the progress has been really
> impressive!
>
> Anyway, I have a little problem. As explained in #114682, I need to use
> digikam on a read only library path. In this scenario searches are quite
> unusable, since it is not possible to add a search album.
> I've developed a 4-line-patch that solves the problem, which allows the
> creation of temporary search albums not stored in the db: what have I to do
> to submit the patch to the developers (P.S: I've been working on a SVN
> repository)?
Hi Domenico,

open a wish on bugs.kde.org and attach your patch.

Achim

>
> Thanks
>
> Domenico
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>

--
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- [hidden email]
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Searches on read only library path

Domenico Salvagnin
Thanks for the hint: now it is #117287

Domenico

On Tuesday 29 November 2005 14:47, Achim Bohnet wrote:

> On Monday 28 November 2005 14:10, Domenico Salvagnin wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have just upgraded from 0.7.4 to 0.8.0 and the progress has been really
> > impressive!
> >
> > Anyway, I have a little problem. As explained in #114682, I need to use
> > digikam on a read only library path. In this scenario searches are quite
> > unusable, since it is not possible to add a search album.
> > I've developed a 4-line-patch that solves the problem, which allows the
> > creation of temporary search albums not stored in the db: what have I to
> > do to submit the patch to the developers (P.S: I've been working on a SVN
> > repository)?
>
> Hi Domenico,
>
> open a wish on bugs.kde.org and attach your patch.
>
> Achim
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > Domenico
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Searches on read only library path

Bugzilla from ach@mpe.mpg.de
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 17:26, Domenico Salvagnin wrote:
> Thanks for the hint: now it is #117287

Good.  I'll try it when time permits.  Bug reports
with a patch are a good thing.

Achim
P.S. Some general comments: Always one wish per bug report.
In #114682 you listed two.  Don't reference to existing
bugs/wishes, add a comment to them and add your vote
instead of creating a new one.
--
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- [hidden email]
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Searches on read only library path

Domenico Salvagnin
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 18:39, Achim Bohnet wrote:

> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 17:26, Domenico Salvagnin wrote:
> > Thanks for the hint: now it is #117287
>
> Good.  I'll try it when time permits.  Bug reports
> with a patch are a good thing.
>
> Achim
> P.S. Some general comments: Always one wish per bug report.
> In #114682 you listed two.  Don't reference to existing
> bugs/wishes, add a comment to them and add your vote
> instead of creating a new one.

I know (you already told me), but I cannot turn back time :-)
By the way, if some of you agrees with any of my proposal, I could help with
the implementation: I've studied software engineering and I have some
experience (3 years) in C++ and Qt programming.

Ready and happy to help!

Domenico
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Searches on read only library path

Bugzilla from ach@mpe.mpg.de
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 23:34, Domenico Salvagnin wrote:

> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 18:39, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 November 2005 17:26, Domenico Salvagnin wrote:
> > > Thanks for the hint: now it is #117287
> >
> > Good.  I'll try it when time permits.  Bug reports
> > with a patch are a good thing.
> >
> > Achim
> > P.S. Some general comments: Always one wish per bug report.
> > In #114682 you listed two.  Don't reference to existing
> > bugs/wishes, add a comment to them and add your vote
> > instead of creating a new one.
>
> I know (you already told me), but I cannot turn back time :-)

Oh, me?  Normally this is Jokeles job ;)  Sorry.

> By the way, if some of you agrees with any of my proposal, I could help with
> the implementation: I've studied software engineering and I have some
> experience (3 years) in C++ and Qt programming.

I like the feature. I can't judge if your solution to the
problem is the right (tm) one.

Nevertheless to be really useful at least a
        --library-path /path/to/anther/image/tree
option is needed too.
Only 'complication' here is that --library-path <path> should not
be remembered, e.g.,
        digikam --library-path /path/to/anther/image/tree
and later
        digikam
digikam should _not_ come up with /path/to/anther/image/tree but
again with the 'default' one, e.g., ~/Pictures or whatever was
chosen by the user.

You have have my vote for this 'read-only' feature.  Let's see
what the digikam developers think.
 
> Ready and happy to help!

Great!  Feel free to join #digikam on freenode IRC.
Have a look at the wish/bug report on b.k.o and/or
TODO file in svn.

Achim


>
> Domenico
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>

--
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- [hidden email]
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users