SVN build, where is the new digkam installed?

[Peter Neubauer-3]

Hi there,
trying to compile digikam using the provided example SVN script on
http://www.digikam.org/?q=download/svn (unmodified, on Kubuntu
Drapper), everything seems to work fine, but starting /usr/bin/digikam
gives me my good old 0.8.2 where is the script installing the final
artifacts?

Thanks

/peter
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Christian David-2]

Am Dienstag, 26. September 2006 12:09 schrieb Peter Neubauer:
> starting /usr/bin/digikam gives me my good old 0.8.2 where is the script
> installing the final artifacts?
Without looking it up, I guess /usr/local/bin because it´s the default for
packages and other software which is not supported by the distibutions.

Christian Dáivd

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Peter Neubauer-3]

Mmh,
no. Not there. Even an updatedb and locate digikam does not reveal
other than the default digikam installation so I wonder if anything
acutally got installed. is there some place to look where the 'make
install' target installs the digikam binary? Some log or so?

/peter

On 9/26/06, Christian David <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Am Dienstag, 26. September 2006 12:09 schrieb Peter Neubauer:
> > starting /usr/bin/digikam gives me my good old 0.8.2 where is the script
> > installing the final artifacts?
> Without looking it up, I guess /usr/local/bin because it´s the default for
> packages and other software which is not supported by the distibutions.
>
> Christian Dáivd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Gilles Caulier-2]

On Tuesday 26 September 2006 17:12, Peter Neubauer wrote:
> Mmh,
> no. Not there. Even an updatedb and locate digikam does not reveal
> other than the default digikam installation so I wonder if anything
> acutally got installed. is there some place to look where the 'make
> install' target installs the digikam binary? Some log or so?
>

Go to digikam/digikam source code folder.

Toggle to root.

run "make install"

Look where is copied digikam binary file.

you can set the right installation directory to use ./configure -- prefix=my
prefered dir. Take a look into README file.

Gilles

> /peter
>
> On 9/26/06, Christian David <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 26. September 2006 12:09 schrieb Peter Neubauer:
> > > starting /usr/bin/digikam gives me my good old 0.8.2 where is the
> > > script installing the final artifacts?
> >
> > Without looking it up, I guess /usr/local/bin because it´s the default
> > for packages and other software which is not supported by the
> > distibutions.
> >
> > Christian Dáivd
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Peter Neubauer-3]

Thanks to all,
it seems to work now, after tracking down all needed libs etc. It's
jsut a bit confusing that the version and startup image still says
0.8.2 even if I run it from the digikam dir?

/peter

On 9/27/06, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Tuesday 26 September 2006 17:12, Peter Neubauer wrote:
> > Mmh,
> > no. Not there. Even an updatedb and locate digikam does not reveal
> > other than the default digikam installation so I wonder if anything
> > acutally got installed. is there some place to look where the 'make
> > install' target installs the digikam binary? Some log or so?
> >
>
> Go to digikam/digikam source code folder.
>
> Toggle to root.
>
> run "make install"
>
> Look where is copied digikam binary file.
>
> you can set the right installation directory to use ./configure -- prefix=my
> prefered dir. Take a look into README file.
>
> Gilles
>
> > /peter
> >
> > On 9/26/06, Christian David <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 26. September 2006 12:09 schrieb Peter Neubauer:
> > > > starting /usr/bin/digikam gives me my good old 0.8.2 where is the
> > > > script installing the final artifacts?
> > >
> > > Without looking it up, I guess /usr/local/bin because it´s the default
> > > for packages and other software which is not supported by the
> > > distibutions.
> > >
> > > Christian Dáivd
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Digikam-users mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Gilles Caulier-2]

On Wednesday 27 September 2006 12:14, Peter Neubauer wrote:
> Thanks to all,
> it seems to work now, after tracking down all needed libs etc. It's
> jsut a bit confusing that the version and startup image still says
> 0.8.2 even if I run it from the digikam dir?

Because the 0.9.0 have not been installed at the same place than 0.8.2 (if you
do it, of course 0.8.2 will be lost).

In fact at startup, digikam load splash available in default kde apps data
folder. if digikam 0.9.0 is installed ouside the standard kde folder, it will
use 0.8.2 instead.

Gilles

>
> /peter
>
> On 9/27/06, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 September 2006 17:12, Peter Neubauer wrote:
> > > Mmh,
> > > no. Not there. Even an updatedb and locate digikam does not reveal
> > > other than the default digikam installation so I wonder if anything
> > > acutally got installed. is there some place to look where the 'make
> > > install' target installs the digikam binary? Some log or so?
> >
> > Go to digikam/digikam source code folder.
> >
> > Toggle to root.
> >
> > run "make install"
> >
> > Look where is copied digikam binary file.
> >
> > you can set the right installation directory to use ./configure --
> > prefix=my prefered dir. Take a look into README file.
> >
> > Gilles
> >
> > > /peter
> > >
> > > On 9/26/06, Christian David <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag, 26. September 2006 12:09 schrieb Peter Neubauer:
> > > > > starting /usr/bin/digikam gives me my good old 0.8.2 where is the
> > > > > script installing the final artifacts?
> > > >
> > > > Without looking it up, I guess /usr/local/bin because it´s the
> > > > default for packages and other software which is not supported by the
> > > > distibutions.
> > > >
> > > > Christian Dáivd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Digikam-users mailing list
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Digikam-users mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users