Returned Mail: Digikam-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 12
Locked
Returned Mail: Digikam-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 12
 
|
The original message was received at Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:00:21 +0200 (MEST)
from [hidden email] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <[hidden email]> (reason: 550 host mx-ha01.web.de [217.72.192.149] said: 550 <[hidden email]> Benutzer hat zuviele Mails auf dem Server. / User has too many messages on the server.) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mx-ha01.web.de [217.72.192.149]: >>> RCPT TO:<[hidden email]> <<< 550 host mx-ha01.web.de [217.72.192.149] said: 550 <[hidden email]> Benutzer hat zuviele Mails auf dem Server. / User has too many messages on the server. 550 5.0.0 Mailbox unavailable Send Digikam-users mailing list submissions to [hidden email] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [hidden email] You can reach the person managing the list at [hidden email] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Digikam-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Returned Mail: Digikam-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 11 (Mail Delivery Subsystem) 2. Re: jpeg compression (Bj?rn Kvisli) 3. Re: jpeg compression (Arnd Baecker) 4. Re: jpeg compression (Bj?rn Kvisli) 5. Re: jpeg compression (Arnd Baecker) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 12:00:16 +0200 (MEST) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[hidden email]> Subject: [Digikam-users] Returned Mail: Digikam-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 11 To: <[hidden email]> Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" The original message was received at Sat, 7 Jul 2007 12:00:16 +0200 (MEST) from [hidden email] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <[hidden email]> (reason: 550 host mx-ha01.web.de [217.72.192.149] said: 550 <[hidden email]> Benutzer hat zuviele Mails auf dem Server. / User has too many messages on the server.) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mx-ha01.web.de [217.72.192.149]: >>> RCPT TO:<[hidden email]> <<< 550 host mx-ha01.web.de [217.72.192.149] said: 550 <[hidden email]> Benutzer hat zuviele Mails auf dem Server. / User has too many messages on the server. 550 5.0.0 Mailbox unavailable -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: [hidden email] Subject: Digikam-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 11 Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 12:00:08 +0200 Size: 6589 Url: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20070707/11a29fc7/attachment-0001.mht ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:33:57 +0200 From: Bj?rn Kvisli <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] jpeg compression To: digiKam - Digital Photo Management for the masses <[hidden email]> Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" L?rdag 30 juni 2007 18:34, skrev Arnd Baecker: > Would it make sense to put a brief summary of the contents of this > thread into a FAQ entry (eg. "Which image format should I choose?")? > > If yes, Bjorn, could you maybe set up a short text, which > I could then put into the FAQ on the digikam homepage? > Hi Arnd I was about to start writing a small piece, but discovered something unfortunate when prepping this week's holiday photos from Berlin and Potsdam: I used the Digikam batch process to convert the jpeg files from my Nikon D40 to png, and found that all the exif data were lost during conversion. I also took a few photos with my digital VCR camera, but these images did not loose the exif data. Strange? When I opened a jpeg file from the D40 in the editor and saved it as a png, the exif data were also *not* lost. I have Digkam 0.9.0. I'll experiment further and finally send you a small piece for the faq. -Bjorn > Alternatively, is there anything which should be added to > handbook, which already has a detailed account on image formats, see > http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/using-filefor >matsupport.html ? > > Best, Arnd > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:56:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Arnd Baecker <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] jpeg compression To: digiKam - Digital Photo Management for the masses <[hidden email]> Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Bjoern, On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, [iso-8859-1] Bj?rn Kvisli wrote: > L?rdag 30 juni 2007 18:34, skrev Arnd Baecker: > > Would it make sense to put a brief summary of the contents of this > > thread into a FAQ entry (eg. "Which image format should I choose?")? > > > > If yes, Bjorn, could you maybe set up a short text, which > > I could then put into the FAQ on the digikam homepage? > > > Hi Arnd > I was about to start writing a small piece, but discovered something > unfortunate when prepping this week's holiday photos from Berlin and Potsdam: > I used the Digikam batch process to convert the jpeg files from my Nikon D40 > to png, and found that all the exif data were lost during conversion. I also > took a few photos with my digital VCR camera, but these images did not loose > the exif data. Strange? When I opened a jpeg file from the D40 in the editor > and saved it as a png, the exif data were also *not* lost. I have Digkam > 0.9.0. You could try with 0.9.2, but I am not sure if anything was done in that part ... Not sure, but maybe you should file a bug report, if there is no further input on this in the next days Best, Arnd ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 00:01:50 +0200 From: Bj?rn Kvisli <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] jpeg compression To: digiKam - Digital Photo Management for the masses <[hidden email]> Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" L?rdag 07 juli 2007 23:56, skrev Arnd Baecker: > Hi Bjoern, > > On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, [iso-8859-1] Bj?rn Kvisli wrote: > > L?rdag 30 juni 2007 18:34, skrev Arnd Baecker: > > > Would it make sense to put a brief summary of the contents of this > > > thread into a FAQ entry (eg. "Which image format should I choose?")? > > > > > > If yes, Bjorn, could you maybe set up a short text, which > > > I could then put into the FAQ on the digikam homepage? > > > > Hi Arnd > > I was about to start writing a small piece, but discovered something > > unfortunate when prepping this week's holiday photos from Berlin and > > Potsdam: I used the Digikam batch process to convert the jpeg files from > > my Nikon D40 to png, and found that all the exif data were lost during > > conversion. I also took a few photos with my digital VCR camera, but > > these images did not loose the exif data. Strange? When I opened a jpeg > > file from the D40 in the editor and saved it as a png, the exif data > > were also *not* lost. I have Digkam 0.9.0. > > Sounds like a bug (or non-feature) to me. > You could try with 0.9.2, but I am not sure if anything was > done in that part ... > Not sure, but maybe you should file a bug report, > if there is no further input on this in the next days > > Best, Arnd > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 00:09:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Arnd Baecker <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] jpeg compression To: digiKam - Digital Photo Management for the masses <[hidden email]> Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, [iso-8859-1] Bj?rn Kvisli wrote: > L?rdag 07 juli 2007 23:56, skrev Arnd Baecker: > > Hi Bjoern, > > > > On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, [iso-8859-1] Bj?rn Kvisli wrote: > > > L?rdag 30 juni 2007 18:34, skrev Arnd Baecker: > > > > Would it make sense to put a brief summary of the contents of this > > > > thread into a FAQ entry (eg. "Which image format should I choose?")? > > > > > > > > If yes, Bjorn, could you maybe set up a short text, which > > > > I could then put into the FAQ on the digikam homepage? > > > > > > Hi Arnd > > > I was about to start writing a small piece, but discovered something > > > unfortunate when prepping this week's holiday photos from Berlin and > > > Potsdam: I used the Digikam batch process to convert the jpeg files from > > > my Nikon D40 to png, and found that all the exif data were lost during > > > conversion. I also took a few photos with my digital VCR camera, but > > > these images did not loose the exif data. Strange? When I opened a jpeg > > > file from the D40 in the editor and saved it as a png, the exif data > > > were also *not* lost. I have Digkam 0.9.0. > > > > Sounds like a bug (or non-feature) to me. > > You could try with 0.9.2, but I am not sure if anything was > > done in that part ... > > I'm not sure if I manage to install 0.9.2 on Kubuntu Dapper. (I know never stop a running system - so don't blame me if it breaks ...) Good luck, Arnd ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users End of Digikam-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 12 ********************************************* _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
attachment0 (522 bytes) | Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |