Regarding OS for digiKam

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Regarding OS for digiKam

Swati Lodha
Hello.

digiKam is not properly functional on my system. So I plan to format and system and build it again.

Would it okay to use Ubuntu instead of Kubuntu (my current Linux distro)? (since digiKam uses many K packages and libraries)


Regards
Swati

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Regarding OS for digiKam

Chris Green
Swati Lodha <[hidden email]> wrote:

> [-- multipart/alternative, encoding 7bit, 34 lines --]
>
>     [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: UTF-8, 13 lines --]
>
> Hello.
>
> digiKam is not properly functional on my system. So I plan to format and
> system and build it again.
>
> Would it okay to use Ubuntu instead of Kubuntu (my current Linux distro)?
> (since digiKam uses many K packages and libraries)
>
I run Digikam in xubuntu.  When you install it lots of kde libraries
are pulled in, but it works fine.

--
Chris Green
·

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Regarding OS for digiKam

Gilles Caulier-4
Mine is Mageia Linux, Cauldron currently (next release 6).

This Linux box integrate very well KDE technologies. The guy who package Plasma and KF5 and Qt5, release also digiKam tarballs source code !

So digiKam is very well integrated.

But Mageia 5 is old now and use a non stable KF5 release. This is why i work on beta version of Mageia.

So, i cannot recommend Mageia 6 for you. The system can be unstable in time when update is processed.

Gilles Caulier

2016-05-11 9:28 GMT+02:00 <[hidden email]>:
Swati Lodha <[hidden email]> wrote:
> [-- multipart/alternative, encoding 7bit, 34 lines --]
>
>     [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: UTF-8, 13 lines --]
>
> Hello.
>
> digiKam is not properly functional on my system. So I plan to format and
> system and build it again.
>
> Would it okay to use Ubuntu instead of Kubuntu (my current Linux distro)?
> (since digiKam uses many K packages and libraries)
>
I run Digikam in xubuntu.  When you install it lots of kde libraries
are pulled in, but it works fine.

--
Chris Green
·

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Regarding OS for digiKam

Noeck
In reply to this post by Swati Lodha
Hello Swati,

> Would it okay to use Ubuntu instead of Kubuntu (my current Linux distro)?

I use digiKam on Ubuntu and it works nicely. It installes a lot of KDE
packages as dependencies, though. If I understand the developers
correctly, the dependencies will be much reduced in the next/a future
version. But if the amount of installed packages does not bother you,
there is no problem with digikam on Ubuntu.

Cheers,
Joram
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Regarding OS for digiKam

christian graesser
In reply to this post by Chris Green

For Kubuntu 16.04 you need to add the repository of phillip5 https://launchpad.net/~philip5/+archive/ubuntu/extra

And then install digikam5.

That works quite fine for me with my image database from digikam 4.

Best regards
Christian

Swati Lodha <[hidden email]> wrote:
> [-- multipart/alternative, encoding 7bit, 34 lines --]
>
>     [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: UTF-8, 13 lines --]
>
> Hello.
>
> digiKam is not properly functional on my system. So I plan to format and
> system and build it again.
>
> Would it okay to use Ubuntu instead of Kubuntu (my current Linux distro)?
> (since digiKam uses many K packages and libraries)
>
I run Digikam in xubuntu.  When you install it lots of kde libraries
are pulled in, but it works fine.

--
Chris Green
·

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Regarding OS for digiKam

David Lindblad
In reply to this post by Swati Lodha
TAt5


Skickat från min Samsung Mobil



-------- Originalmeddelande --------
Från: Noeck <[hidden email]>
Datum: 01-06-2016 18:21 (GMT+01:00)
Till: [hidden email]
Rubrik: Re: [Digikam-users] Regarding OS for digiKam


Hello Swati,

> Would it okay to use Ubuntu instead of Kubuntu (my current Linux distro)?

I use digiKam on Ubuntu and it works nicely. It installes a lot of KDE
packages as dependencies, though. If I understand the developers
correctly, the dependencies will be much reduced in the next/a future
version. But if the amount of installed packages does not bother you,
there is no problem with digikam on Ubuntu.

Cheers,
Joram
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Regarding OS for digiKam

Chris Green
In reply to this post by Noeck
Noeck <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello Swati,
>
> > Would it okay to use Ubuntu instead of Kubuntu (my current Linux distro)?
>
> I use digiKam on Ubuntu and it works nicely. It installes a lot of KDE
> packages as dependencies, though. If I understand the developers
> correctly, the dependencies will be much reduced in the next/a future
> version. But if the amount of installed packages does not bother you,
> there is no problem with digikam on Ubuntu.
>
... and I use it on xubuntu with similar comments.

--
Chris Green
·

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users