I haven't been confused before with digiKam updates. This one confuses me. I'm not sure what to download.
I saw something like: digiKam-7.0.0-beta3-20200422T165716-Win64-debug.exe then something else like: digiKam-7.0.0-rc-20200426T135902-Win64.exe and there were other windows choices. Microsoft complained about the two files just listed, and I had to positively keep them. Similarly, when running them to install, I had to force acceptance. James M. Orr
2705 E Sussex Way Fresno CA 93726 I sincerely wish each of you, your family, friends, contacts, community the best of health in these times of pestilence and disease. There is no foreseeable end to proximity-distancing, and with that a concomitant need for social glue. On 4/26/2020 8:04 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
Dear all digiKam fans and users, The digiKam development team is proud to release digiKam 7.0.0-beta3. For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: https://www.digikam.org/news/2020-04-26-7.0.0-beta3_release_announcement/ Best digiKam team james_orr.vcf (276 bytes) Download Attachment |
I think the "debug" one has debug signals which make the installation larger but allows for generating useful bug reports for digiKam developers. Since it is 7.0.0-beta3 we are talking about I would stick with the version with debug symbols unless you have very limited space on your drive. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: James Orr <[hidden email]> Date: 2020-04-30 1:48 p.m. (GMT-07:00) To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] digiKam 7.0.0-beta3 is released I saw something like: digiKam-7.0.0-beta3-20200422T165716-Win64-debug.exe then something else like: digiKam-7.0.0-rc-20200426T135902-Win64.exe and there were other windows choices. Microsoft complained about the two files just listed, and I had to positively keep them. Similarly, when running them to install, I had to force acceptance. James M. Orr
2705 E Sussex Way Fresno CA 93726 I sincerely wish each of you, your family, friends, contacts, community the best of health in these times of pestilence and disease. There is no foreseeable end to proximity-distancing, and with that a concomitant need for social glue. On 4/26/2020 8:04 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
Dear all digiKam fans and users, The digiKam development team is proud to release digiKam 7.0.0-beta3. For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: https://www.digikam.org/news/2020-04-26-7.0.0-beta3_release_announcement/ Best digiKam team |
In pre-release download area, the README file explain well the
difference between differents bundles available : http://www-ftp.lip6.fr/pub/X11/kde-applicationdata/digikam/README Gilles Caulier Le jeu. 30 avr. 2020 à 22:13, Andrey Goreev <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > I think the "debug" one has debug signals which make the installation larger but allows for generating useful bug reports for digiKam developers. > > Since it is 7.0.0-beta3 we are talking about I would stick with the version with debug symbols unless you have very limited space on your drive. > > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: James Orr <[hidden email]> > Date: 2020-04-30 1:48 p.m. (GMT-07:00) > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] digiKam 7.0.0-beta3 is released > > I haven't been confused before with digiKam updates. This one confuses me. I'm not sure what to download. > > I saw something like: digiKam-7.0.0-beta3-20200422T165716-Win64-debug.exe > then something else like: digiKam-7.0.0-rc-20200426T135902-Win64.exe > and there were other windows choices. Microsoft complained about the two files just listed, and I had to positively keep them. Similarly, when running them to install, I had to force acceptance. > James M. Orr > ________________________________ > > 2705 E Sussex Way > > Fresno CA 93726 > > I sincerely wish each of you, your family, friends, contacts, community the best of health in these times of pestilence and disease. There is no foreseeable end to proximity-distancing, and with that a concomitant need for social glue. > > ________________________________ > ________________________________ > On 4/26/2020 8:04 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > Dear all digiKam fans and users, > > The digiKam development team is proud to release digiKam > 7.0.0-beta3. For more details, see announcement on > digikam.org: > > https://www.digikam.org/news/2020-04-26-7.0.0-beta3_release_announcement/ > > Best > digiKam team > > |
Thanks for the clarification. The README file was useful.
I noted that the link on the announcement page sent me to https://download.kde.org/unstable/digikam/ I saw the the link to the README file went to http://www-ftp.lip6.fr/pub/X11/kde-applicationdata/digikam/ I did not see the README file on the link to download.kde.org ... In the ftp link, I did see the digiKam-7.0.0-rc-20200501T123827-Win64.exe file name, which is what I was accustomed to. This was much clearer to me I successfully downloaded the 7.0.0-rc file and successfully installed it. Microsoft complained about an unsigned, rarely installed file. I brute-forced permissions to continue. The installation went well and the program is now running. I admit to wishing for the tag that said Beta3, though that is a minor inconvenience. I love using Digikam to manage my collection of digital images. I am greatly impressed by the expertise and dedication of the development team. I hope all of you remain well and happy. James M. Orr
2705 E Sussex Way Fresno CA 93726 I sincerely wish each of you, your family, friends, contacts, community the best of health in these times of pestilence and disease. There is no foreseeable end to proximity-distancing, and with that a concomitant need for social glue. On 4/30/2020 2:14 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
In pre-release download area, the README file explain well the difference between differents bundles available : http://www-ftp.lip6.fr/pub/X11/kde-applicationdata/digikam/README Gilles Caulier Le jeu. 30 avr. 2020 à 22:13, Andrey Goreev [hidden email] a écrit :I think the "debug" one has debug signals which make the installation larger but allows for generating useful bug reports for digiKam developers. Since it is 7.0.0-beta3 we are talking about I would stick with the version with debug symbols unless you have very limited space on your drive. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: James Orr [hidden email] Date: 2020-04-30 1:48 p.m. (GMT-07:00) To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] digiKam 7.0.0-beta3 is released I haven't been confused before with digiKam updates. This one confuses me. I'm not sure what to download. I saw something like: digiKam-7.0.0-beta3-20200422T165716-Win64-debug.exe then something else like: digiKam-7.0.0-rc-20200426T135902-Win64.exe and there were other windows choices. Microsoft complained about the two files just listed, and I had to positively keep them. Similarly, when running them to install, I had to force acceptance. James M. Orr ________________________________ 2705 E Sussex Way Fresno CA 93726 I sincerely wish each of you, your family, friends, contacts, community the best of health in these times of pestilence and disease. There is no foreseeable end to proximity-distancing, and with that a concomitant need for social glue. ________________________________ ________________________________ On 4/26/2020 8:04 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote: Dear all digiKam fans and users, The digiKam development team is proud to release digiKam 7.0.0-beta3. For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: https://www.digikam.org/news/2020-04-26-7.0.0-beta3_release_announcement/ Best digiKam team james_orr.vcf (276 bytes) Download Attachment |
Le sam. 2 mai 2020 à 17:30, James Orr <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> > Thanks for the clarification. The README file was useful. > I noted that the link on the announcement page sent me to https://download.kde.org/unstable/digikam/ > I saw the the link to the README file went to http://www-ftp.lip6.fr/pub/X11/kde-applicationdata/digikam/ > I did not see the README file on the link to download.kde.org ... > In the ftp link, I did see the digiKam-7.0.0-rc-20200501T123827-Win64.exe file name, which is what I was accustomed to. This was much clearer to me yes, my release script have a bug an has only published the debug versions of files. It fixed now as you can see with current RC files... Gilles Caulier |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |