Hi Rei,
Leica M9 images from http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m9/examples.htm are displayed fine for me in digikam 1.2.0 and 1.3.0-svn. Could you take a screenshot and provide a sample image? Regards, Jens > > digiKam Version 1.2.0 Using KDE 4.2.4 (KDE 4.2.4) > ubuntu 9.04 2.6.28-18-generic > > Leica M9 DNG files (both Compressed and Uncompressed) files appear fine > in Albums, but when opened in the Image Editor do not render properly. > The rendered image looks like 2 discolored half-size images in the upper > half and three overlapping black and white copies in the lower half. M8 > DNGs render and edit very well. I'll be happy to share example M9 DNGs > with anyone interested. > > Thanks, > > -rei > Rei Shinozuka > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Same for me. just tested :
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4012/4582989705_8de3d1fbe4_o.png http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4064/4582989759_128752842c_o.png Gilles Caulier 2010/5/5 Jens Müller <[hidden email]>: > Hi Rei, > > Leica M9 images from http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m9/examples.htm are > displayed fine for me in digikam 1.2.0 and 1.3.0-svn. Could you take a > screenshot and provide a sample image? > > Regards, Jens > >> >> digiKam Version 1.2.0 Using KDE 4.2.4 (KDE 4.2.4) >> ubuntu 9.04 2.6.28-18-generic >> >> Leica M9 DNG files (both Compressed and Uncompressed) files appear fine >> in Albums, but when opened in the Image Editor do not render properly. >> The rendered image looks like 2 discolored half-size images in the upper >> half and three overlapping black and white copies in the lower half. M8 >> DNGs render and edit very well. I'll be happy to share example M9 DNGs >> with anyone interested. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -rei >> Rei Shinozuka >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Thanks fellows. I now suspect I've made a bad build of digikam 1.2.0.
It crashes now when I even try to open an M8 DNG file, which I definitely know worked before I built 1.2.0. I'm still on Ubuntu 9.0.4, so I'm going to upgrade my OS first, then build digikam 1.2.0, kipi-plugins 1.2.0 and so on. Sorry for the false alarm. I'll let you know when I'm done. -rei On 05/06/2010 03:13 AM, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Same for me. just tested : > > http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4012/4582989705_8de3d1fbe4_o.png > > http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4064/4582989759_128752842c_o.png > > Gilles Caulier > > 2010/5/5 Jens Müller<[hidden email]>: > >> Hi Rei, >> >> Leica M9 images from http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m9/examples.htm are >> displayed fine for me in digikam 1.2.0 and 1.3.0-svn. Could you take a >> screenshot and provide a sample image? >> >> Regards, Jens >> >> >>> digiKam Version 1.2.0 Using KDE 4.2.4 (KDE 4.2.4) >>> ubuntu 9.04 2.6.28-18-generic >>> >>> Leica M9 DNG files (both Compressed and Uncompressed) files appear fine >>> in Albums, but when opened in the Image Editor do not render properly. >>> The rendered image looks like 2 discolored half-size images in the upper >>> half and three overlapping black and white copies in the lower half. M8 >>> DNGs render and edit very well. I'll be happy to share example M9 DNGs >>> with anyone interested. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -rei >>> Rei Shinozuka >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Forgive me, Digikam 1.2.0 renders both compressed and uncompressed Leica
M9 images perfectly. I must have had a library mismatch somewhere, I had built Digikam 1.2.0 from source on an out-dated Ubuntu 9.04 platform. I upgraded to the brand-new 10.04, got Digikam right out of synaptic repositories and it was perfect. Sorry for the false alarm, and thanks, you guys are the greatest. -rei On 05/06/2010 03:13 AM, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Same for me. just tested : > > http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4012/4582989705_8de3d1fbe4_o.png > > http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4064/4582989759_128752842c_o.png > > Gilles Caulier > > 2010/5/5 Jens Müller<[hidden email]>: > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |