|
|
Dropbox! Dropbox's default behavior is to store a copy of every file on every computer you back it up to. Plus there's the copy stored on their cloud. PLUS, if you pay for the extra, they do unlimited file versioning. It works incredibly well.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source < [hidden email]> Cc: Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 08:36:59 +0200 Subject: [Digikam-users] what do you use for backups? Hi all, I'm keeping all my files on a removable hard drive, backupped on a couple of other removable hard drives (rsync and similar). One problem I'm facing is that while I work on the "master" I tend to move, arrange, rename images. This makes backup more difficult, because I've the same data in different paths between the master and the replicas. I'm investigating some more advanced tool, like bord and rsnapshot. What do you use for your backups?
Just to mention: I'm using ext4 file systems and my data is around 290+ GB.
Thanks, Luca Send Digikam-users mailing list submissions to
[hidden email]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[hidden email]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[hidden email]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Digikam-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: PicasaWeb tool... (Michael Rasmussen)
2. Re: Digikam won't start after upgrading from 14.04 to 16.04
(Hans-Peter huth)
3. Re: Digikam won't start after upgrading from 14.04 to 16.04
(Chris Green)
4. what do you use for backups? (Luca Ferrari)
5. Re: what do you use for backups? (.)
6. Re: what do you use for backups? (Simon Cropper)
7. Re: what do you use for backups? (Nicolas MF)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Rasmussen <[hidden email]>
To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <[hidden email]>
Cc:
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 08:25:20 -0700
Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] PicasaWeb tool...
I was wrong.
Picasaweb will continue to exist in parallel with GPhoto.
However no new updates will occur.
See:
http://googlephotos.blogspot.com/2016/02/moving-on-from-picasa.html
I've verified this by viewing my Picasaweb album and seeing that my Nexus phone
is still auto uploading images to Picasaweb.
People can use both, but as you asked in your original post we will be in
continual transition stage.
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 05:17:58PM +0200, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> will fully replace want mean that is now fully replaced or not yet ? This
> is the question.
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2016-06-05 17:10 GMT+02:00 Michael Rasmussen <[hidden email]>:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 11:56:42AM +0200, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > > In the tool, GPhoto and PicasaWeb tools refer to the save menu entry.
> > There
> > > are some difference in source code to manage the dialog with Web Service.
> > >
> > > My Question is simple : GPhoto has remplaced fully PicasaWeb now, or we
> > are
> > > always in transition stage ?
> >
> > Communications from google say GPhoto will fully replace PicasaWeb.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon
> > Be Appropriate && Follow Your Curiosity
> > When you don't know what to do, do the work in front of you.
> > ~ Calvin Coolidge
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
--
Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon
Be Appropriate && Follow Your Curiosity
It’s a contention of Heat-Moon’s—believing as he does any traveler who
misses the journey misses about all he’s going to get—that a man becomes
his attentions. His observations and curiosity, they make and remake him.
~ William Least Heat Moon
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hans-Peter huth <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Cc:
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:19:04 +0200
Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] Digikam won't start after upgrading from 14.04 to 16.04
On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 16:33:28 +0200
Jean-Fred JOLIMAITRE <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thanks for the answer,
>
> Should I understand that there is no other way to solve this problem
> than waiting for Ubuntu to update the package ?
>
You may try the newest version 4.14 which is available for Ubuntu 16.04
thanks to Philip Johnson.
See here:
https://launchpad.net/~philip5/+archive/ubuntu/extra?field.series_filter=xenial
This also includes several libraries and works (almost) fine for me.
Hope this helps.
@Gilles: any chance to get another bug fix release of the 4.x series?
HP
> JFred
>
> Le 05/06/2016 16:02, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
> > It's a binary compatibility broken with package libkexiv2. Report this
> > problem to your distro packagers....
> >
> > Gilles Caulier
> >
> > 2016-06-05 15:55 GMT+02:00 Jean-Fred JOLIMAITRE
> > <[hidden email]
> > <mailto:[hidden email]>>:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Message is "digikam: symbol lookup error:
> > /usr/lib/libkexiv2.so.11: undefined symbol:
> > _ZN5Exiv213XmpProperties10registerNsERKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEES8"
> > Should I upgrade or downgrade libkexiv 2 ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > JFred
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > <mailto:[hidden email]>
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
--
--------- 8< -------------
Why taunt me? Why upbraid me? I am merely a genius, not a god.
(Nero Wolfe)
Meine Bilder: http://jalbum.net/a/1456383
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chris Green <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Cc:
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:39:02 +0100
Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] Digikam won't start after upgrading from 14.04 to 16.04
Jean-Fred JOLIMAITRE <[hidden email]> wrote:
> [-- multipart/alternative, encoding 7bit, 123 lines --]
>
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: utf-8, 40 lines --]
>
> Thanks for the answer,
>
> Should I understand that there is no other way to solve this problem
> than waiting for Ubuntu to update the package ?
>
I'm running Digikam on xubuntu 16.04 without problems, I'm pretty sure
xubuntu uses the same repositories as ubuntu.
When I run 'digikam --version' I see:-
chris$ digikam --version
Qt: 4.8.7
KDE Development Platform: 4.14.16
digiKam: 4.12.0
chris$
--
Chris Green
·
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Luca Ferrari <[hidden email]>
To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <[hidden email]>
Cc:
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 08:36:59 +0200
Subject: [Digikam-users] what do you use for backups?
Hi all,
I'm keeping all my files on a removable hard drive, backupped on a
couple of other removable hard drives (rsync and similar).
One problem I'm facing is that while I work on the "master" I tend to
move, arrange, rename images. This makes backup more difficult,
because I've the same data in different paths between the master and
the replicas.
I'm investigating some more advanced tool, like bord and rsnapshot.
What do you use for your backups?
Just to mention: I'm using ext4 file systems and my data is around 290+ GB.
Thanks,
Luca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "." <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Cc:
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:34:38 +1000
Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] what do you use for backups?
I use grsync. There is an option to remove files that no longer exist
on the source. This gets around the problem when you rename or move a file.
On 6/06/2016 4:36 PM, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm keeping all my files on a removable hard drive, backupped on a
> couple of other removable hard drives (rsync and similar).
> One problem I'm facing is that while I work on the "master" I tend to
> move, arrange, rename images. This makes backup more difficult,
> because I've the same data in different paths between the master and
> the replicas.
> I'm investigating some more advanced tool, like bord and rsnapshot.
> What do you use for your backups?
>
> Just to mention: I'm using ext4 file systems and my data is around 290+ GB.
>
> Thanks,
> Luca
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Simon Cropper <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Cc:
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:53:35 +1000
Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] what do you use for backups?
Hey Luca,
I haven't looked for a while but checked just before responding --
I have 19668 files occupying 284.8 GB.
I regularly backup without any problems.
First, think of you database as images+metadata (in file or as an
associated XMP) and a separate database that consolidates this
data into a useful form.
Second, remember the database can be readily recreated from the
images+metadata. Throughout the time I have been using digikam I
have rebuild my database probably 10 times.
So, assuming all your images+metadata are in one directory you can
use any operating-system-based backup solution.
Personally I use Ubuntu 14.04 LTS as my operating system and rsync
as my backup solution.
My rsync commands are all stored in a bash script, which also
starts/stops/extracts data from other computers that the family
use (Windows 7 and various linux flavours).
I mirror all my copies so after I am finished a backup I have 3
independent and physically separate copies.
I hope this feedback helps.
On 06/06/16 16:36, Luca Ferrari wrote:
Hi all,
I'm keeping all my files on a removable hard drive, backupped on a
couple of other removable hard drives (rsync and similar).
One problem I'm facing is that while I work on the "master" I tend to
move, arrange, rename images. This makes backup more difficult,
because I've the same data in different paths between the master and
the replicas.
I'm investigating some more advanced tool, like bord and rsnapshot.
What do you use for your backups?
Just to mention: I'm using ext4 file systems and my data is around 290+ GB.
Thanks,
Luca
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nicolas MF <[hidden email]>
To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <[hidden email]>
Cc:
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 08:55:09 +0200
Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] what do you use for backups?
Grsync too :)
I also use external HD with different sizes for backup. Since I have around 800 Gb of data, I only back up the jpg in the smaller ones (e.g. 500 Gb), while the bigger ones (1Tb) also get the RAW files. Grsync is very comfortable for this, since you can save as many configurations as you like, so I have one for each external hard drive. And I doubt there is something more efficient than rsync out there anyway. Regards, Nicolas
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
|
Locked
