Achim wrote:
> When you write the annoucement can you paste the announcement > part like: > > 0.8.1 changes > o new icons > o fix ... bug > ... > > As NEWS file into the final digikamimageplugins tarball. OK, this is one point I have missed - would have been better to prepare the NEWS file earlier and integrate it in the first tarball, cause my plan is NOT to do a new tarball (or modify the existing one) if there are no problems with compiling etc. > Your remove PACKAGE file from tarball so better remove > release_digikamimageplugins*.rb too, right? Yes, good idea from my point of view. Toma (?) has editied the script that does the packaging to exclude the PACKAGING file and I can modify it to exclude the ruby files, too. gilles wrote: > > To make things a little easier and straight forward I already labeled it > > as it would be the final tarball (so wish me luck!). If we encounter any > > problems we will fix it and I will prepare a tarball with RC2 in its > > name. > > No need to have RC2. I think you can do a final release directly... OK, lets see what the other testers report ... > No problem here to compile it under mandriva 2006 official. Good job... Fine. > > Good night (and best wishes to Gilles to recover your health) > > I'm better now (:=)))). I need to get any drugs against... Good healthy sleep is the best medicine one can get, except for workaholics like you maybe ;-) OK, we have to cosmetic improvements for a possible RC2: an updated NEWS file (new icons + bugfixes) and excluding the ruby scripts. I tend to not doing a RC2 for this small glitches, but please let me hear your opinion. In any case I will fix this things in the next release. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Le Jeudi 9 Février 2006 18:26, Sebastian Röder a écrit :
> Achim wrote: > > When you write the annoucement can you paste the announcement > > part like: > > > > 0.8.1 changes > > o new icons > > o fix ... bug > > ... > > > > As NEWS file into the final digikamimageplugins tarball. > > OK, this is one point I have missed - would have been better to prepare the > NEWS file earlier and integrate it in the first tarball, cause my plan is > NOT to do a new tarball (or modify the existing one) if there are no > problems with compiling etc. > > > Your remove PACKAGE file from tarball so better remove > > release_digikamimageplugins*.rb too, right? > > Yes, good idea from my point of view. Toma (?) has editied the script that > does the packaging to exclude the PACKAGING file and I can modify it to > exclude the ruby files, too. > > gilles wrote: > > > To make things a little easier and straight forward I already labeled > > > it as it would be the final tarball (so wish me luck!). If we encounter > > > any problems we will fix it and I will prepare a tarball with RC2 in > > > its name. > > > > No need to have RC2. I think you can do a final release directly... > > OK, lets see what the other testers report ... > > > No problem here to compile it under mandriva 2006 official. Good job... > > Fine. > > > > Good night (and best wishes to Gilles to recover your health) > > > > I'm better now (:=)))). I need to get any drugs against... > > Good healthy sleep is the best medicine one can get, except for workaholics > like you maybe ;-) > > OK, we have to cosmetic improvements for a possible RC2: an updated NEWS > file (new icons + bugfixes) and excluding the ruby scripts. I tend to not > doing a RC2 for this small glitches, but please let me hear your opinion. > In any case I will fix this things in the next release. Fine for me. Let's go (:=))) Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Sebastian Roeder
Op donderdag 9 februari 2006 18:26, schreef Sebastian Röder:
> Achim wrote: > > When you write the annoucement can you paste the announcement > > part like: > > > > 0.8.1 changes > > o new icons > > o fix ... bug > > ... > > > > As NEWS file into the final digikamimageplugins tarball. > > OK, this is one point I have missed - would have been better to prepare the > NEWS file earlier and integrate it in the first tarball, cause my plan is > NOT to do a new tarball (or modify the existing one) if there are no > problems with compiling etc. program which outputs a much better changelog. I always use the output of the file, without editing and note the noteworthy changes in a NEWS file. The call to generate the changelog is: svn log -v --xml \ https://toma@.../home/kde/trunk/playground/utils/rsibreak \ | python /usr/src/kde/branches/KDE/3.5/kde-common/release/svn2log.py \ -u /usr/src/kde/branches/KDE/3.5/kde-common/accounts Adjust paths to your own checkout of kde-common of course. We might do the same for digiKam. The announce looks fine btw. Toma _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel attachment0 (196 bytes) Download Attachment |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |