Questions

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Questions

Louis A. Turk
I'm using Digikam 5.5.0.

1. I need to copy selected jpg images to a new folder without that new
folder becoming a new album. How can that be done?

2. I put some important jpg images in a queue (they still appear to be
there), as I thought I could then copy them to a new folder by choosing
"Group Selected Here." Now they now longer show up under their dates or
tags, and if they were copied to a new folder I can't find it. Do I
still have my files? If so, how can I get them to show up again under
their dates and tags?

drl
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Questions

Simon Frei
Hi,

I am not quite following what you want to do, so the following might be off:

1. Folders are albums. If you want to ignore specific folders (i.e. they
exist on your filesystem, but are not shown in digiKam), you can do so
in the configuration under Database in the Ignore Directories tab.

2. What do you mean by queue? Group selected here does only what it
says: It groups the items you selected. Groups are still visible both
via tag or dates sidebar (just as a single item that can be expanded).

On 12/05/17 18:44, Louis A. Turk wrote:

> I'm using Digikam 5.5.0.
>
> 1. I need to copy selected jpg images to a new folder without that new
> folder becoming a new album. How can that be done?
>
> 2. I put some important jpg images in a queue (they still appear to be
> there), as I thought I could then copy them to a new folder by choosing
> "Group Selected Here." Now they now longer show up under their dates or
> tags, and if they were copied to a new folder I can't find it. Do I
> still have my files? If so, how can I get them to show up again under
> their dates and tags?
>
> drl


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Questions

Louis A. Turk
Hi Simon,

On 05/13/2017 12:54 AM, Simon Frei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not quite following what you want to do, so the following might be off:
>
> 1. Folders are albums. If you want to ignore specific folders (i.e. they
> exist on your filesystem, but are not shown in digiKam), you can do so
> in the configuration under Database in the Ignore Directories tab.

I see. Thanks for the explanation.

>
> 2. What do you mean by queue?

Queue as created by Batch Queue Manager.

Group selected here does only what it
> says: It groups the items you selected. Groups are still visible both
> via tag or dates sidebar (just as a single item that can be expanded).

But no matter what group a photo is in it should be displayed when one
of its tags is clicked in the left panel, right? In my case they do not
display. And no new group was created so far as I can see. When I use a
file manager I can see that the files still exist, and I can even
display them with Linux Mint Mate Xviewer, but they do not display in
Digikam5. What must I do to make them display again?

The Batch Queue Manager chapter of the documentation is blank. So,
experimenting or asking on this forum seems to be the only way to learn,
though a little painful. Thanks for responding.

By the way, Digikam5 is impressive. I like it. It is the fastest way to
tag photos I've found.

drl

>
> On 12/05/17 18:44, Louis A. Turk wrote:
>> I'm using Digikam 5.5.0.
>>
>> 1. I need to copy selected jpg images to a new folder without that new
>> folder becoming a new album. How can that be done?
>>
>> 2. I put some important jpg images in a queue (they still appear to be
>> there), as I thought I could then copy them to a new folder by choosing
>> "Group Selected Here." Now they now longer show up under their dates or
>> tags, and if they were copied to a new folder I can't find it. Do I
>> still have my files? If so, how can I get them to show up again under
>> their dates and tags?
>>
>> drl
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Questions

Louis A. Turk
On 05/13/2017 11:54 AM, Louis A. Turk wrote:

> Hi Simon,
>
> On 05/13/2017 12:54 AM, Simon Frei wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am not quite following what you want to do, so the following might be off:
>>
>> 1. Folders are albums. If you want to ignore specific folders (i.e. they
>> exist on your filesystem, but are not shown in digiKam), you can do so
>> in the configuration under Database in the Ignore Directories tab.
>
> I see. Thanks for the explanation.
>
>>
>> 2. What do you mean by queue?
>
> Queue as created by Batch Queue Manager.
>
> Group selected here does only what it
>> says: It groups the items you selected. Groups are still visible both
>> via tag or dates sidebar (just as a single item that can be expanded).
>
> But no matter what group a photo is in it should be displayed when one
> of its tags is clicked in the left panel, right? In my case they do not
> display. And no new group was created so far as I can see. When I use a
> file manager I can see that the files still exist, and I can even
> display them with Linux Mint Mate Xviewer, but they do not display in
> Digikam5. What must I do to make them display again?
>
> The Batch Queue Manager chapter of the documentation is blank. So,
> experimenting or asking on this forum seems to be the only way to learn,
> though a little painful. Thanks for responding.
>
> By the way, Digikam5 is impressive. I like it. It is the fastest way to
> tag photos I've found.
>
> drl
>
>>
>> On 12/05/17 18:44, Louis A. Turk wrote:
>>> I'm using Digikam 5.5.0.
>>>
>>> 1. I need to copy selected jpg images to a new folder without that new
>>> folder becoming a new album. How can that be done?
>>>
>>> 2. I put some important jpg images in a queue (they still appear to be
>>> there), as I thought I could then copy them to a new folder by choosing
>>> "Group Selected Here." Now they now longer show up under their dates or
>>> tags, and if they were copied to a new folder I can't find it. Do I
>>> still have my files? If so, how can I get them to show up again under
>>> their dates and tags?
>>>
>>> drl
>>
>>
>

I just notice that they do display in Light Table.

drl
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Questions

Louis A. Turk
On 05/13/2017 01:39 PM, Louis A. Turk wrote:

> On 05/13/2017 11:54 AM, Louis A. Turk wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 05/13/2017 12:54 AM, Simon Frei wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am not quite following what you want to do, so the following might be off:
>>>
>>> 1. Folders are albums. If you want to ignore specific folders (i.e. they
>>> exist on your filesystem, but are not shown in digiKam), you can do so
>>> in the configuration under Database in the Ignore Directories tab.
>>
>> I see. Thanks for the explanation.
>>
>>>
>>> 2. What do you mean by queue?
>>
>> Queue as created by Batch Queue Manager.
>>
>> Group selected here does only what it
>>> says: It groups the items you selected. Groups are still visible both
>>> via tag or dates sidebar (just as a single item that can be expanded).
>>
>> But no matter what group a photo is in it should be displayed when one
>> of its tags is clicked in the left panel, right? In my case they do not
>> display. And no new group was created so far as I can see. When I use a
>> file manager I can see that the files still exist, and I can even
>> display them with Linux Mint Mate Xviewer, but they do not display in
>> Digikam5. What must I do to make them display again?
>>
>> The Batch Queue Manager chapter of the documentation is blank. So,
>> experimenting or asking on this forum seems to be the only way to learn,
>> though a little painful. Thanks for responding.
>>
>> By the way, Digikam5 is impressive. I like it. It is the fastest way to
>> tag photos I've found.
>>
>> drl
>>
>>>
>>> On 12/05/17 18:44, Louis A. Turk wrote:
>>>> I'm using Digikam 5.5.0.
>>>>
>>>> 1. I need to copy selected jpg images to a new folder without that new
>>>> folder becoming a new album. How can that be done?
>>>>
>>>> 2. I put some important jpg images in a queue (they still appear to be
>>>> there), as I thought I could then copy them to a new folder by choosing
>>>> "Group Selected Here." Now they now longer show up under their dates or
>>>> tags, and if they were copied to a new folder I can't find it. Do I
>>>> still have my files? If so, how can I get them to show up again under
>>>> their dates and tags?
>>>>
>>>> drl
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> I just notice that they do display in Light Table.
>
> drl
>

OK, in tag or label view only one image displays, but to the left of
that image is a triangle. Clicking on that triangle displays the rest of
the images.

drl

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Questions

Simon Frei


On 13/05/17 08:19, Louis A. Turk wrote:

> On 05/13/2017 01:39 PM, Louis A. Turk wrote:
>> On 05/13/2017 11:54 AM, Louis A. Turk wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On 05/13/2017 12:54 AM, Simon Frei wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am not quite following what you want to do, so the following might be off:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Folders are albums. If you want to ignore specific folders (i.e. they
>>>> exist on your filesystem, but are not shown in digiKam), you can do so
>>>> in the configuration under Database in the Ignore Directories tab.
>>> I see. Thanks for the explanation.
>>>
>>>> 2. What do you mean by queue?
>>> Queue as created by Batch Queue Manager.
>>>
>>> Group selected here does only what it
>>>> says: It groups the items you selected. Groups are still visible both
>>>> via tag or dates sidebar (just as a single item that can be expanded).
>>> But no matter what group a photo is in it should be displayed when one
>>> of its tags is clicked in the left panel, right? In my case they do not
>>> display. And no new group was created so far as I can see. When I use a
>>> file manager I can see that the files still exist, and I can even
>>> display them with Linux Mint Mate Xviewer, but they do not display in
>>> Digikam5. What must I do to make them display again?
Grouping is a feature that only exists within digiKam (more exactly its
database). So it has no effect on the filesystem, i.e. when viewing
files with other programs or your file manager.
Grouped items are by default hidden behind the "main item". You can show
them by clicking on the group icon in the bottom left or via the context
menu under Group -> Show/Hide Grouped Images. In the table view three
options are availabe: Show all items, only main items of a group or tree
view. Check out the tree view, it's my favourite for grouped items - as
in the most intuitive to use.
>>>
>>> The Batch Queue Manager chapter of the documentation is blank. So,
>>> experimenting or asking on this forum seems to be the only way to learn,
>>> though a little painful. Thanks for responding.
Batch queue manager (bqm) is not really realted to grouping. In some
upcoming release you will be able to include or exclude grouped items
from the bqm. As far as I know the results of bqm are never grouped -
that might be a place for improvement.

>>> By the way, Digikam5 is impressive. I like it. It is the fastest way to
>>> tag photos I've found.
>>>
>>> drl
>>>
>>>> On 12/05/17 18:44, Louis A. Turk wrote:
>>>>> I'm using Digikam 5.5.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. I need to copy selected jpg images to a new folder without that new
>>>>> folder becoming a new album. How can that be done?
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. I put some important jpg images in a queue (they still appear to be
>>>>> there), as I thought I could then copy them to a new folder by choosing
>>>>> "Group Selected Here." Now they now longer show up under their dates or
>>>>> tags, and if they were copied to a new folder I can't find it. Do I
>>>>> still have my files? If so, how can I get them to show up again under
>>>>> their dates and tags?
>>>>>
>>>>> drl
>>>>
>> I just notice that they do display in Light Table.
>>
>> drl
>>
> OK, in tag or label view only one image displays, but to the left of
> that image is a triangle. Clicking on that triangle displays the rest of
> the images.
>
> drl
>
Grouping is enabled in all kinds of views. Quick testing showed the
following behaviour: If the main item of a group has a tag, the entire
group is shown under that tag (with the other elements hidden by
default, but expandable). If the main item of a group does not contain a
tag, but one of the grouped item does, only the grouped item containing
the tag is shown under that tag. I think that is a reasonable behaviour.

Cheers,
Simon