Problem with face recognition

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Problem with face recognition

Jack Marxer
Hello,
I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie and when I try to scan either some selected albums or the whole collection, I immediately get the following message:

Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00


Any idea what is going wrong?


Jack Marxer

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problem with face recognition

Gilles Caulier-4
Forget 4.4.0.

Try universal Linux AppImage bundle 5.4.0 pre-version instead the system based package :


Work perfectly here...

Gilles Caulier

2016-12-06 22:11 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]>:
Hello,
I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie and when I try to scan either some selected albums or the whole collection, I immediately get the following message:

Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00


Any idea what is going wrong?


Jack Marxer


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problem with face recognition

Jack Marxer
Will I lose all the previously tagged faces (several thousand) if I use the 5.4.0 appimage?

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Forget 4.4.0.

Try universal Linux AppImage bundle 5.4.0 pre-version instead the system based package :


Work perfectly here...

Gilles Caulier

2016-12-06 22:11 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]>:
Hello,
I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie and when I try to scan either some selected albums or the whole collection, I immediately get the following message:

Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00


Any idea what is going wrong?


Jack Marxer



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problem with face recognition

Gilles Caulier-4
Typically no. Just backup your database files before, to be sure.

Gilles Caulier

2016-12-06 22:59 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]>:
Will I lose all the previously tagged faces (several thousand) if I use the 5.4.0 appimage?

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Forget 4.4.0.

Try universal Linux AppImage bundle 5.4.0 pre-version instead the system based package :


Work perfectly here...

Gilles Caulier

2016-12-06 22:11 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]>:
Hello,
I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie and when I try to scan either some selected albums or the whole collection, I immediately get the following message:

Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00


Any idea what is going wrong?


Jack Marxer




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problem with face recognition

fch22

Hi All


I have the same behavior with last 5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage

in the option,I have just selected few albums     (not all because of time to proceed)

options I have used (translated from french, so my be not exactly as in windows in english)

- clean-up not confirmed results and analyze again

 - detect and recognize face

in advanced I have also selected "clean-up and rebuilt learning data" to force to analyze again

then execute. Process took 36 seconds , but nothing has changed in the faces. No new, no unknown,..

did I miss something ?


thanks

frederic


Le 07/12/2016 à 04:47, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
Typically no. Just backup your database files before, to be sure.

Gilles Caulier

2016-12-06 22:59 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]>:
Will I lose all the previously tagged faces (several thousand) if I use the 5.4.0 appimage?

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Forget 4.4.0.

Try universal Linux AppImage bundle 5.4.0 pre-version instead the system based package :


Work perfectly here...

Gilles Caulier

2016-12-06 22:11 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]>:
Hello,
I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie and when I try to scan either some selected albums or the whole collection, I immediately get the following message:

Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00


Any idea what is going wrong?


Jack Marxer





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problem with face recognition

Johannes Kapune
Hi Frédéric,

I saw same behaviour when I used face recognition.

If you play with: options / parameter
you will get some more hits but also some false face detections.

(Actually I use a value of 35)

regards
Johannes


Am 11.12.2016 um 11:09 schrieb Frédéric Chaume:

> Hi All
>
>
> I have the same behavior with last 5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage
>
> in the option,I have just selected few albums     (not all because of
> time to proceed)
>
> options I have used (translated from french, so my be not exactly as in
> windows in english)
>
> - clean-up not confirmed results and analyze again
>
> Â - detect and recognize face
>
> in advanced I have also selected "clean-up and rebuilt learning data" to
> force to analyze again
>
> then execute. Process took 36 seconds , but nothing has changed in the
> faces. No new, no unknown,..
>
> did I miss something ?
>
>
> thanks
>
> frederic
>
>
> Le 07/12/2016 à  04:47, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>> Typically no. Just backup your database files before, to be sure.
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2016-12-06 22:59 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>:
>>
>>     Will I lose all the previously tagged faces (several thousand) if
>>     I use the 5.4.0 appimage?
>>
>>     On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Gilles Caulier
>>     <<mailto:[hidden email]>[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>         Forget 4.4.0.
>>
>>         Try universal Linux AppImage bundle 5.4.0 pre-version instead
>>         the system based package :
>>
>>         https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM
>>         <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM>
>>
>>         Work perfectly here...
>>
>>         Gilles Caulier
>>
>>         2016-12-06 22:11 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer
>>         <<mailto:[hidden email]>[hidden email]>:
>>
>>             Hello,
>>             I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie and when I try
>>             to scan either some selected albums or the whole
>>             collection, I immediately get the following message:
>>
>>             Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00
>>
>>
>>             Any idea what is going wrong?
>>
>>
>>             Jack Marxer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problem with face recognition

fch22
Hi Johannes

I tried with same value than you, analysis took 0s and didn't report any
new faces



regards


frederic



Le 11/12/2016 à 12:16, Johannes Kapune a écrit :

> Hi Frédéric,
>
> I saw same behaviour when I used face recognition.
>
> If you play with: options / parameter
> you will get some more hits but also some false face detections.
>
> (Actually I use a value of 35)
>
> regards
> Johannes
>
>
> Am 11.12.2016 um 11:09 schrieb Frédéric Chaume:
>> Hi All
>>
>>
>> I have the same behavior with last 5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage
>>
>> in the option,I have just selected few albums     (not all because of
>> time to proceed)
>>
>> options I have used (translated from french, so my be not exactly as in
>> windows in english)
>>
>> - clean-up not confirmed results and analyze again
>>
>> Â - detect and recognize face
>>
>> in advanced I have also selected "clean-up and rebuilt learning data" to
>> force to analyze again
>>
>> then execute. Process took 36 seconds , but nothing has changed in the
>> faces. No new, no unknown,..
>>
>> did I miss something ?
>>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> frederic
>>
>>
>> Le 07/12/2016 à  04:47, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>> Typically no. Just backup your database files before, to be sure.
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>
>>> 2016-12-06 22:59 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>:
>>>
>>>     Will I lose all the previously tagged faces (several thousand) if
>>>     I use the 5.4.0 appimage?
>>>
>>>     On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Gilles Caulier
>>> <<mailto:[hidden email]>[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Forget 4.4.0.
>>>
>>>         Try universal Linux AppImage bundle 5.4.0 pre-version instead
>>>         the system based package :
>>>
>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM
>>> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM>
>>>
>>>         Work perfectly here...
>>>
>>>         Gilles Caulier
>>>
>>>         2016-12-06 22:11 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer
>>> <<mailto:[hidden email]>[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>>             Hello,
>>>             I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie and when I try
>>>             to scan either some selected albums or the whole
>>>             collection, I immediately get the following message:
>>>
>>>             Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00
>>>
>>>
>>>             Any idea what is going wrong?
>>>
>>>
>>>             Jack Marxer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problem with face recognition

Johannes Kapune
I tried it just now again.

DigiKam starts searching. I do it with complete set of pictures and for
~100.000 it will take some time ;-)

ok, here it is 5.3.0 AppImage

regards
Johannes

Am 11.12.2016 um 18:53 schrieb Frédéric Chaume:

> Hi Johannes
>
> I tried with same value than you, analysis took 0s and didn't report any
> new faces
>
>
>
> regards
>
>
> frederic
>
>
>
> Le 11/12/2016 à 12:16, Johannes Kapune a écrit :
>> Hi Frédéric,
>>
>> I saw same behaviour when I used face recognition.
>>
>> If you play with: options / parameter
>> you will get some more hits but also some false face detections.
>>
>> (Actually I use a value of 35)
>>
>> regards
>> Johannes
>>
>>
>> Am 11.12.2016 um 11:09 schrieb Frédéric Chaume:
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>>
>>> I have the same behavior with last 5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage
>>>
>>> in the option,I have just selected few albums     (not all because of
>>> time to proceed)
>>>
>>> options I have used (translated from french, so my be not exactly as in
>>> windows in english)
>>>
>>> - clean-up not confirmed results and analyze again
>>>
>>> Â - detect and recognize face
>>>
>>> in advanced I have also selected "clean-up and rebuilt learning data" to
>>> force to analyze again
>>>
>>> then execute. Process took 36 seconds , but nothing has changed in the
>>> faces. No new, no unknown,..
>>>
>>> did I miss something ?
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> frederic
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 07/12/2016 à  04:47, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>>> Typically no. Just backup your database files before, to be sure.
>>>>
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>
>>>> 2016-12-06 22:59 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]
>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>:
>>>>
>>>>     Will I lose all the previously tagged faces (several thousand) if
>>>>     I use the 5.4.0 appimage?
>>>>
>>>>     On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Gilles Caulier
>>>> <<mailto:[hidden email]>[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Forget 4.4.0.
>>>>
>>>>         Try universal Linux AppImage bundle 5.4.0 pre-version instead
>>>>         the system based package :
>>>>
>>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM
>>>> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM>
>>>>
>>>>         Work perfectly here...
>>>>
>>>>         Gilles Caulier
>>>>
>>>>         2016-12-06 22:11 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer
>>>> <<mailto:[hidden email]>[hidden email]>:
>>>>
>>>>             Hello,
>>>>             I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie and when I try
>>>>             to scan either some selected albums or the whole
>>>>             collection, I immediately get the following message:
>>>>
>>>>             Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Any idea what is going wrong?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Jack Marxer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problem with face recognition

fch22
Hi all

made some test,

I selected all my albums and it took 18s :-(, and obvisouly no face found

below an extract of the messages from the terminal, if it can help someone

digikam.general: "Face Detection Dialog"
digikam.facesengine: Face database ready for use
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add preview thread
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add single thread detector
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add recognition worker
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add database writer
digikam.general: Total is 682
digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.general: false true
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.general: Check for finish:  0 packages, 0 infos to filter,
hasFinished() true
digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.general: false true
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.general: Check for finish:  0 packages, 0 infos to filter,
hasFinished() true
digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.general: false true
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.general: Check for finish:  0 packages, 0 infos to filter,
hasFinished() true
digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.general: false true
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.general: Check for finish:  0 packages, 0 infos to filter,
hasFinished() true
digikam.general: false false

.....

digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.general: false true
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.general: Check for finish:  0 packages, 0 infos to filter,
hasFinished() true
digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through DBUS


Merry Christmas !!!!



Le 11/12/2016 à 19:43, Johannes Kapune a écrit :

> I tried it just now again.
>
> DigiKam starts searching. I do it with complete set of pictures and
> for ~100.000 it will take some time ;-)
>
> ok, here it is 5.3.0 AppImage
>
> regards
> Johannes
>
> Am 11.12.2016 um 18:53 schrieb Frédéric Chaume:
>> Hi Johannes
>>
>> I tried with same value than you, analysis took 0s and didn't report any
>> new faces
>>
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>> frederic
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 11/12/2016 à 12:16, Johannes Kapune a écrit :
>>> Hi Frédéric,
>>>
>>> I saw same behaviour when I used face recognition.
>>>
>>> If you play with: options / parameter
>>> you will get some more hits but also some false face detections.
>>>
>>> (Actually I use a value of 35)
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Johannes
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 11.12.2016 um 11:09 schrieb Frédéric Chaume:
>>>> Hi All
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have the same behavior with last 5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage
>>>>
>>>> in the option,I have just selected few albums     (not all
>>>> because of
>>>> time to proceed)
>>>>
>>>> options I have used (translated from french, so my be not exactly
>>>> as in
>>>> windows in english)
>>>>
>>>> - clean-up not confirmed results and analyze again
>>>>
>>>> Â - detect and recognize face
>>>>
>>>> in advanced I have also selected "clean-up and rebuilt learning
>>>> data" to
>>>> force to analyze again
>>>>
>>>> then execute. Process took 36 seconds , but nothing has changed in the
>>>> faces. No new, no unknown,..
>>>>
>>>> did I miss something ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>>
>>>> frederic
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 07/12/2016 à  04:47, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>>>> Typically no. Just backup your database files before, to be sure.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-12-06 22:59 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]
>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Will I lose all the previously tagged faces (several thousand) if
>>>>>     I use the 5.4.0 appimage?
>>>>>
>>>>>     On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Gilles Caulier
>>>>> <<mailto:[hidden email]>[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>         Forget 4.4.0.
>>>>>
>>>>>         Try universal Linux AppImage bundle 5.4.0 pre-version instead
>>>>>         the system based package :
>>>>>
>>>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM
>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM>
>>>>>
>>>>>         Work perfectly here...
>>>>>
>>>>>         Gilles Caulier
>>>>>
>>>>>         2016-12-06 22:11 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer
>>>>> <<mailto:[hidden email]>[hidden email]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>             Hello,
>>>>>             I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie and when I
>>>>> try
>>>>>             to scan either some selected albums or the whole
>>>>>             collection, I immediately get the following message:
>>>>>
>>>>>             Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>             Any idea what is going wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>             Jack Marxer
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problem with face recognition

fch22

new update:

I used the option "detect face" only (previously was using (detect and recognize), and it is working better, close to 288 new faces identified, but digikam fialed.

I try to open it again, and as soon as I click on "unknown" in the list of people tags , it failed:


digikam.geoiface: ----
digikam.geoiface: ----
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.database: " ( ( (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id FROM TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) OR ( (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id FROM TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) ) "
digikam.database: Search query:
 "SELECT DISTINCT Images.id, Images.name, Images.album,        Albums.albumRoot,        ImageInformation.rating, Images.category,        ImageInformation.format, ImageInformation.creationDate,        Images.modificationDate, Images.fileSize,        ImageInformation.width,  ImageInformation.height,        ImageTagProperties.value, ImageTagProperties.property, ImageTagProperties.tagid  FROM Images        INNER JOIN ImageTagProperties ON ImageTagProperties.imageid=Images.id        LEFT JOIN ImageInformation ON Images.id=ImageInformation.imageid        INNER JOIN Albums           ON Albums.id=Images.album WHERE Images.status=1 AND (  ( ( (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id FROM TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) OR ( (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id FROM TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) )  );"
 (QVariant(int, 25), QVariant(int, 25), QVariant(QString, "autodetectedFace"), QVariant(int, 25), QVariant(int, 25), QVariant(QString, "tagRegion"))
digikam.database: Search result: 4320
digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.geoiface: ----
digikam.metaengine: Exiv2 ( 2 ) :  Directory Pentax, entry 0x0004: Data area exceeds data buffer, ignoring it.

/tmp/.mount_eSLYuC/AppRun : ligne 37 : 11389 Erreur de segmentation  digikam.wrapper $@


any idea ?

I'm running DK 5.4.0 on Linux Mint 18

(

Date de compilation : Dec 3 2016 (cible : debug)
Rév. : e827054ebf4ff3ea7a4adaadcb36f989f48cc50e )

thanks for your help



Le 24/12/2016 à 18:41, Frédéric Chaume a écrit :
Hi all

made some test,

I selected all my albums and it took 18s :-(, and obvisouly no face found

below an extract of the messages from the terminal, if it can help someone

digikam.general: "Face Detection Dialog"
digikam.facesengine: Face database ready for use
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add preview thread
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add single thread detector
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add recognition worker
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add database writer
digikam.general: Total is 682
digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.general: false true
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.general: Check for finish:  0 packages, 0 infos to filter, hasFinished() true
digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.general: false true
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.general: Check for finish:  0 packages, 0 infos to filter, hasFinished() true
digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.general: false true
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.general: Check for finish:  0 packages, 0 infos to filter, hasFinished() true
digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.general: false true
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.general: Check for finish:  0 packages, 0 infos to filter, hasFinished() true
digikam.general: false false

.....

digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Using  2  CPU core to run threads
digikam.general: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
digikam.general: false true
digikam.general: One job is done
digikam.general: Check for finish:  0 packages, 0 infos to filter, hasFinished() true
digikam.general: false false
digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through DBUS


Merry Christmas !!!!



Le 11/12/2016 à 19:43, Johannes Kapune a écrit :
I tried it just now again.

DigiKam starts searching. I do it with complete set of pictures and for ~100.000 it will take some time ;-)

ok, here it is 5.3.0 AppImage

regards
Johannes

Am 11.12.2016 um 18:53 schrieb Frédéric Chaume:
Hi Johannes

I tried with same value than you, analysis took 0s and didn't report any
new faces



regards


frederic



Le 11/12/2016 à 12:16, Johannes Kapune a écrit :
Hi Frédéric,

I saw same behaviour when I used face recognition.

If you play with: options / parameter
you will get some more hits but also some false face detections.

(Actually I use a value of 35)

regards
Johannes


Am 11.12.2016 um 11:09 schrieb Frédéric Chaume:
Hi All


I have the same behavior with last 5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage

in the option,I have just selected few albums     (not all because of
time to proceed)

options I have used (translated from french, so my be not exactly as in
windows in english)

- clean-up not confirmed results and analyze again

 - detect and recognize face

in advanced I have also selected "clean-up and rebuilt learning data" to
force to analyze again

then execute. Process took 36 seconds , but nothing has changed in the
faces. No new, no unknown,..

did I miss something ?


thanks

frederic


Le 07/12/2016 à 04:47, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
Typically no. Just backup your database files before, to be sure.

Gilles Caulier

2016-12-06 22:59 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <[hidden email]
[hidden email]>:

    Will I lose all the previously tagged faces (several thousand) if
    I use the 5.4.0 appimage?

    On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Gilles Caulier
<[hidden email][hidden email]> wrote:

        Forget 4.4.0.

        Try universal Linux AppImage bundle 5.4.0 pre-version instead
        the system based package :

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM
<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM>

        Work perfectly here...

        Gilles Caulier

        2016-12-06 22:11 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer
<[hidden email][hidden email]>:

            Hello,
            I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie and when I try
            to scan either some selected albums or the whole
            collection, I immediately get the following message:

            Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00


            Any idea what is going wrong?


            Jack Marxer