I'm using 1.0.0-beta4 but I've noticed that the 1.0.0 has a very insidious bug concerning photo captions. I add captions to photos in an album, sometimes selecting more than one photo and sometimes a single photo. Everything appears fine but when I go back to the album I find that one caption has ended up in all the photos (or at least most of them) trashing all the work from the previous session. This never happened in 0.9.x series and I never really tried the 0.10.0 release, moving straight to the 1.0 betas so I have no idea whether this is new for the 1.0 series.
I haven't yet been able to work out when it all goes wrong in the database. What I can say is that the files themselves receive the incorrect caption so it's not a database corruption after the captions have been written to the files (I use automatic syncing of metadata to files). I am extra-vigilant at the moment but I still have not been able to spot a pattern for the corruption.
Am I alone? Could this be caused by the system wide version being 0.10.0 (I know that I have segvs in the image editor which I think are related to system libraries being pulled in instead of the libraries from the private build).
Tim
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
It's fixed by Marcel to current implementation from svn (beta5)
gilles caulier 2009/9/15 Tim Jenness <[hidden email]>: > I'm using 1.0.0-beta4 but I've noticed that the 1.0.0 has a very insidious > bug concerning photo captions. I add captions to photos in an album, > sometimes selecting more than one photo and sometimes a single photo. > Everything appears fine but when I go back to the album I find that one > caption has ended up in all the photos (or at least most of them) trashing > all the work from the previous session. This never happened in 0.9.x series > and I never really tried the 0.10.0 release, moving straight to the 1.0 > betas so I have no idea whether this is new for the 1.0 series. > I haven't yet been able to work out when it all goes wrong in the database. > What I can say is that the files themselves receive the incorrect caption so > it's not a database corruption after the captions have been written to the > files (I use automatic syncing of metadata to files). I am extra-vigilant at > the moment but I still have not been able to spot a pattern for the > corruption. > Am I alone? Could this be caused by the system wide version being 0.10.0 (I > know that I have segvs in the image editor which I think are related to > system libraries being pulled in instead of the libraries from the private > build). > Tim > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |